[Bug target/63633] [avr] internal compiler error: unrecognizable insn with mult insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63633 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dinuxbg at gmail dot com,

[Bug objc++/56604] Missing obj-c++.srcman target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > I can probably do this; taking While I do still intend to do this, I've transitioned between computers since I last wrote this and am not sure I have my committi

[Bug c++/53815] Explicit specialization of member enumeration of a class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53815 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/81141] missing warning using sizeof a/sizeof *a with a zero-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81141 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/99527] ICE when using nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99527 --- Comment #2 from janekb04 at icloud dot com --- Indeed, it seems to have been fixed. I'm not sure if this issue should be closed though. Until the fix comes out in a stable release, there is still the possibility that a regression will occur a

[Bug middle-end/101862] [C, C++] Potential '?:' diagnostic for always-true expressions in boolean context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101862 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/101895] [11/12 Regression] SLP Vectorizer change pushes VEC_PERM_EXPR into bad location spoiling further optimization opportunities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug tree-optimization/101895] [11/12 Regression] SLP Vectorizer change pushes VEC_PERM_EXPR into bad location spoiling further optimization opportunities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I wonder if we should do something like in match.pd anyways (unrelated to this issue): (simplify (vec_perm (any_binary:s (VEC_DUP/CONSTRUCTOR@0) @1)@2 @2 @3) (any_binary @0 (vec_perm @1 @1 @3)))

[Bug tree-optimization/101895] New: [11/12 Regression] SLP Vectorizer change pushes VEC_PERM_EXPR into bad location spoiling further optimization opportunities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895 Bug ID: 101895 Summary: [11/12 Regression] SLP Vectorizer change pushes VEC_PERM_EXPR into bad location spoiling further optimization opportunities Product: gcc

[Bug c++/101853] [12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- This particular ICE/test-failure disappeared (unlikely: was fixed) with a commit in the series (last known failing as described..first subsequently known passing) cba64d855df5..ee8f9ff00d79.

[Bug c++/100718] parameter packs not expanded error with a type member which has the same name as a pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100718 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/101893] There is no vgbbd on p7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101893 --- Comment #1 from Paul Clarke --- I'll take ownership of this, except I'm not sure how to effect that. The fix has been posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/577023.html, and awaits reviews/approval.

[Bug c++/100007] Parameter packs not expanded with bit field in lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think GCC handles any struct/union Parameter expansion correctly.

[Bug c++/100007] Parameter packs not expanded with bit field in lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99800] ICE Segmentation fault when put lambda in template parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99800 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect it is a dup of one of: PR c++/89565 PR c++/93383 PR c++/95291 PR c++/99200 PR c++/99683

[Bug c++/99800] ICE Segmentation fault when put lambda in template parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99800 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/99628] g++ fails to do the implicit conversion when rewritten operator<=>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99628 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/92426] ICE on spaceship declaration plus other P1185R2 interaction issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92426 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I can't reproduce the ICE in GCC 10.1.0 or 11.1.0 or on the trunk.

[Bug c++/101894] [11/12 Regression] ICE with multiple friend declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894 --- Comment #3 from Volker Reichelt --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #1) > > Actually the same ICE happens with regular templates (without the > > "-fconcepts") flag: > > Though that is

[Bug c/101537] -Wconversion false positive in ternary and |=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101222] unwanted templated constructor instantiation due to wrong binary operator access with enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101222 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.3 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101833] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wformat on a constructor with a virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101833 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.2.0, 12.0 --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/101054] Compiler inconsistently gives error when constexpr class function is called from lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101054 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks to be fixed in GCC 11+

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc internal error with Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||8.1.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/100853] [11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:4148

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100853 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/100853] [11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:4148

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100853 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.0, 8.3.0 Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/100281] ICE with SImode pointer assignment in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101894] [11/12 Regression] ICE with multiple friend declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101894] [11/12 Regression] ICE with multiple friend declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Dup of PR 51577 ? Well it does seem fixed on the trunk and that PR is fixed on the trunk (though not closed).

[Bug c++/101894] New: [11/12 Regression] [concepts] ICE with multiple friend declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894 Bug ID: 101894 Summary: [11/12 Regression] [concepts] ICE with multiple friend declarations Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-val

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 66672, which changed state. Bug 66672 Summary: std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/63192] non-mutable lambda capture by value on reference does not apply const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot org --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug c++/66672] std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/101624] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with RTL' structure, have 'const_decl' in maybe_optimize_ubsan_ptr_ifn, at sanopt.c:495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101624 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree

[Bug preprocessor/101638] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wtraditional since r11-4953-g1d00f8c86324c40a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101638 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/101638] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wtraditional since r11-4953-g1d00f8c86324c40a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101638 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1c4b1c100889c0f0b11dd79ca083dfb3bc00f4a commit r11-8861-gb1c4b1c100889c0f0b11dd79ca083dfb3bc00f4a Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/101759] #pragma omp declare simd/variant or oacc routine parsing bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101759 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd345961831980e3103411d61bba249efa2ee720 commit r11-8859-gdd345961831980e3103411d61bba249efa2ee720 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/101624] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with RTL' structure, have 'const_decl' in maybe_optimize_ubsan_ptr_ifn, at sanopt.c:495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101624 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7fd8e978ec101a6ce9c92c72d38f7bdff30b2c5 commit r11-8858-ge7fd8e978ec101a6ce9c92c72d38f7bdff30b2c5 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/100424] Inline virtual function not emitted with -fsanitize=undefined -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100424 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||93115 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug ipa/100424] Inline virtual function not emitted with -fsanitize=undefined -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100424 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- -fno-devirtualize allows it to link.

[Bug tree-optimization/101854] [11/12 Regression] Invalid warning -Wstringop-overflow wrong argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/101854] [11/12 Regression] Invalid warning -Wstringop-overflow wrong argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfi

[Bug c/100525] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100525 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/99720] Feature Request: Better errors for C++ features when compiling C (pass by reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-03-23 00:00:00 |2021-8-12 Severity|normal

[Bug target/101823] GCC generates the wrong string in the assembly code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101823 --- Comment #2 from bootmgr at 163 dot com --- I reconfigured gcc with --enable-threads=win32 (not --enable-threads=posix) and this gcc can compile the program correctly.The posix thread model cannot.

[Bug c++/99527] ICE when using nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99527 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks to be fixed on the trunk.

[Bug c++/99399] why does not a pack expansion that is a using-delcaration which intends to introduce the base classes's constructor accept by GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99399 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed in GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/66672] std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 99152, which changed state. Bug 99152 Summary: Wrong type of implicitly captured by-value unevaluated operand https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99152 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/66672] std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oleksandr.koval.dev at gmail dot c

[Bug c++/99152] Wrong type of implicitly captured by-value unevaluated operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99152 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99160] A wrong accessible check when using a using-declaration that introduces the names of type and function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99160 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99186] std::tuple compilation error when elements are specializations of template class declared with template < auto E > syntax with E being a enumerator of a enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99186 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed in GCC 11.2.0 and on the trunk.

[Bug rtl-optimization/101885] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101885 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Qirun Zhang from comment #1) > My bisection points to g:529ea7d9596b26ba103578eeab448e9862a2d2c5 r10-7268

[Bug rtl-optimization/101885] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/88781] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-truncation warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88781 Bug 88781 depends on bug 101451, which changed state. Bug 101451 Summary: Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/101451] Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 Quentin Armitage changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug rtl-optimization/101885] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Summary|wrong code at -

[Bug tree-optimization/101451] Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 --- Comment #5 from Quentin Armitage --- In the code of my original example (which I have simplified) === #include static char dest[16]; static char src[16] = "012345678901234"; int main(__attribute__(void) {

[Bug c++/99214] Incorrect template arguments shown in constraint satisfaction failure diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #12) > Andreas, is this something you may be able to have a look at? > (It's about the architectures you used to "play" with on FreeBSD.) There are other

[Bug middle-end/88781] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-truncation warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88781 Bug 88781 depends on bug 101451, which changed state. Bug 101451 Summary: Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/101451] Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug c++/101887] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with invalid declaration of 'operator delete'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101887 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/101887] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with invalid declaration of 'operator delete'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101887 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/94058] defaulted three way comparison operator defined as deleted when a member is a small bitfield of long type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94058 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||84516 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug preprocessor/101638] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wtraditional since r11-4953-g1d00f8c86324c40a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101638 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:408d88af60e3268f7fad59fa393ec7e28922c435 commit r12-2890-g408d88af60e3268f7fad59fa393ec7e28922c435 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- Yes, absolutely right on safe_inc_pos, will address that as well. Much obliged!

[Bug middle-end/101829] problems with inline + __attribute__ ((malloc (deallocator)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101829 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||99715 Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/90589] In Fedora 30 ps hangs using address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/90589] In Fedora 30 ps hangs using address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589 --- Comment #16 from Mathieu Desnoyers --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15) > Maybe it is best if you file a glibc bug too. There was already a glibc bug reporting this. I've done the required changes to reopen it.

[Bug c++/101886] [11/12 Regression][concepts] ICE with auto as template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101886 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3

[Bug c++/97601] ICE when using type determined by std::tuple_element_t<...>, on tuple generated from type id stored in std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97601 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-11-19 00:00:00 |2021-8-12 URL|https://gcc

[Bug c++/89761] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (argument_pack_select)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89761 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/88295] ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptiona’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3652

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88295 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/86515] [9/10 Regression] std::initializer_list constructor is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 10.3.0, 8.1.0,

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/101891] Adjust -fzero-call-used-regs to always use XOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target Target|

[Bug target/101893] New: There is no vgbbd on p7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101893 Bug ID: 101893 Summary: There is no vgbbd on p7 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assi

[Bug middle-end/101892] New: -fzero-call-used-regs does not work for sibling-calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101892 Bug ID: 101892 Summary: -fzero-call-used-regs does not work for sibling-calls Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Tobler --- I try to find some spare cycles to look into. But I can only investigate the aarch64 part. The powerpcs are gone here.

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/90589] In Fedora 30 ps hangs using address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Mathieu Desnoyers from comment #14) > I've proposed a RFC patch on the libc-alpha mailing list which fixes the > issue: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-August/130129.html > > I

[Bug middle-end/101891] New: Adjust -fzero-call-used-regs to always use XOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891 Bug ID: 101891 Summary: Adjust -fzero-call-used-regs to always use XOR Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug sanitizer/90589] In Fedora 30 ps hangs using address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589 --- Comment #14 from Mathieu Desnoyers --- I've proposed a RFC patch on the libc-alpha mailing list which fixes the issue: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-August/130129.html It does have a few downsides: it turns all i18n rwloc

[Bug fortran/101871] Array of strings of different length passed as an argument produces invalid result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > PR85547 is likely related to this one. Yes, indeed. Looks like a duplicate. I checked that array.c(gfc_match_array_constructor) does the right things. So,

[Bug target/98309] [AVX512] Missing expander for ldexpm3.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98309 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c8df06e46493f6cb55333db72fa1802279b48b4 commit r12-2888-g8c8df06e46493f6cb55333db72fa1802279b48b4 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Thu Au

[Bug tree-optimization/101890] [12 regression] ICEs on aarch64 after r12-2836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101890 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/101890] New: [12 regression] ICEs on aarch64 after r12-2836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101890 Bug ID: 101890 Summary: [12 regression] ICEs on aarch64 after r12-2836 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug c++/98712] Incorrect defaulted operator== at compile time and runtime when declared constexpr and inheriting (c++20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/101870] std::lerp is missing Arithmetic overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk but I plan to backport it as well.

[Bug libstdc++/101870] std::lerp is missing Arithmetic overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9017326e19fe278d5f62898cca4682b17f8e8e07 commit r12-2886-g9017326e19fe278d5f62898cca4682b17f8e8e07 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/101219] [12 Regression] ice in perform_or_defer_access_check since r12-1804-g65870e75616ee435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/101219] [12 Regression] ice in perform_or_defer_access_check since r12-1804-g65870e75616ee435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27a1fb385b7fe706f05608e53f3e91d7d3442b8b commit r12-2883-g27a1fb385b7fe706f05608e53f3e91d7d3442b8b Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- As a reminder, the code compiled fine with no warnings until the rewrite of the back-threader. Based on the IL example above, it looks to me like the new pass is not producing a self-consistent CFG in all c

[Bug fortran/101871] Array of strings of different length passed as an argument produces invalid result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c/101838] sizeof of struct with array of unspecified bound folded to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101838 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2ba65ab6010f0d507bf5512a0223692e6653b23 commit r12-2882-gd2ba65ab6010f0d507bf5512a0223692e6653b23 Author: Martin Uecker Date: T

  1   2   >