https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100782
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Trying to understand why rejection happens: -fdump-rtl-all-slim 295r.reload
says:
Choosing alt 0 in insn 12: (0) =r (1) %0 (2) rI08
{*addsi3_compact_lra}
alt=0: No input/output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62133
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.4.0, 8.5.0, 9.3.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58124
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101824
Bug ID: 101824
Summary: VOLATILE not honored
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39258
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
union sse2 does not pass via a register for me on x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49480
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47948
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47948
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 44332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39787
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, does the pragma happen before or after the attribute?
Because I don't get an ICE on any recent GCC but the code is all rejected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101823
--- Comment #1 from bootmgr at 163 dot com ---
Created attachment 51276
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51276&action=edit
test.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101823
Bug ID: 101823
Summary: GCC generates the wrong string in the assembly code.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80406
--- Comment #4 from Sean ---
Can confirm the warning no longer appears to issue (at least as of GCC 11).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40988
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect the inline-asm is broken, I am 90% sure of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39783
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39783
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33725
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||Microblaze
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39856
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ygepes at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50316
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87624
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91008
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems fixed in GCC 11+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66909
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66909
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is 4.7 backtrace:
t65.c:1:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x7547af crash_signal
/bajas/pinskia/src/toolchain-47/scripts/../src/gcc/toplev.c:348
0xa55004 linemap_macro_map_lookup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
--- Comment #3 from Noah Watkins ---
Happy to work on providing a different reproducer if it is helpful.
This was the first smallish example we could create, and the `free of
an invalid pointer error` seemed as good enough as any unexpected
beha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
--- Comment #4 from David Ledger ---
It still seems like a bug though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #7 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85237
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #9 from Jeremy R. ---
Thank you for the resources and for your insight, it's much appreciated.
Is there interest in updating the intentional false-dependency logic to not
fire for architectures newer than cannonlake?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jeremy R. from comment #7)
> Does the false dependency still apply to modern CPUs?
How modern is modern?
Skylake fixed this for lzcnt and tzcnt.
Cannon Lake (and Ice Lake) fixed this for popcnt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84858
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems fixed in GCC 8+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101822
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy R. ---
Never mind, 101821 was invalid and the initial xor eax eax is by design (still
wondering whether this applies to new CPUs though). There is still a
discrepancy between this code and the __builtin_popcount code t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy R. ---
Does the false dependency still apply to modern CPUs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy R. ---
Ah thank you @Andrew Pinski @Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101822
Bug ID: 101822
Summary: Codegen bug for popcount
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is not unnecessary nor redundant, but fully intentional.
See e.g. PR62011.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
Summary|Redundant xor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Jeremy R. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Redundant xor eax eax |Redundant xor eax eax
|re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gpiez at web dot de
--- Comment #24 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy R. ---
This happens with __builtin_popcount as well, not just std::popcount. This
appears to have started in GCC 4.9.2. https://godbolt.org/z/4dGWvT5zr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Bug ID: 101821
Summary: Redundant xor eax eax
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51428
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogu00 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|verify_flow_info ICE with |verify_flow_info ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101783
nick huang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-08
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-02-04 14:27:46 |2021-8-8
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24590
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
config/frv/frv.h:#define INVOKE__main
config/rs6000/eabi.h:#define INVOKE__main
I think the other ones that invokve __main is mingw/cygwin targets.
I wonder if there is a way to get rid of this really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101820
Bug ID: 101820
Summary: fatal error: ISO_Fortran_binding.h: No such file or
directory
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|11.1.0 |
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> I think it was rather fixed in r8-7466-g3ec16e3610721403.
Yes that is more likely, I was trying to find that but I could not :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.4, 4.7.1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42200
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 8+ produces this for both:
cmpl$1, %edi
jbe .L1
testb $1, %dil
je .L4
.L1:
ret
.L4:
shrl%edi
jmp a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22599
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101819
Bug ID: 101819
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at
expr.c:9552 since
r12-2789-gf31da42e047e8018ca6ad9809273bc7efb6ffcaf
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101812
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
--- Comment #10 from Cameron ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> None of the testcases ICE in GCC 11+
I notice that if I change the repro to:
#include
struct S {
int a;
int* operator<=>(const S&) const = default;
};
bool b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
Bug 25623 depends on bug 26602, which changed state.
Bug 26602 Summary: cfg cleanup can mess up incoming frequencies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26602
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 26602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26602
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-02 12:57:12 |2021-8-8
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89062
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfc at mit dot edu
--- Comment #7 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to scott snyder from comment #3)
> Here's another example that crashes in the same place, but which doesn't use
> -fvtable-verify. This example does use vectorization, and the ICE occurs
> only wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #8 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Theodore.Papadopoulo@inria.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101689
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28498
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101818
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo