https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-10-26 00:00:00 |2021-7-13
Known to fail|10.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #1)
> By the way, i think if _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE==0, it should be just an
> __builtin_abort(). This will make optimizers much happier. The bounds
> checking will be only once.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101275
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101275
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18a463bb666cc8f3421589e7641ec617acb84741
commit r12-2268-g18a463bb666cc8f3421589e7641ec617acb84741
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Fri Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101432
Bug ID: 101432
Summary: NULL dereferences aren't assumed to be unreachable
even with -fdelete-null-pointer-checks
-fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92505
Christopher Di Bella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cjdb.ns at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100166
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063eba7ca73030139a3bf822ed127cf09b2fc226
commit r12-2266-g063eba7ca73030139a3bf822ed127cf09b2fc226
Author: Michael Meissner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101431
--- Comment #1 from roc at ocallahan dot org ---
Clang follows the spec (clang 12, -fdebug-default-version=5):
The Directory Table:
0 /tmp/pernosco-submit-test
1 out
The File Name Table
Entry Dir TimeSizeMD5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101431
Bug ID: 101431
Summary: gcc-generated DWARF5 .debug_line directory entries
violate the DWARF5 spec
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93086
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 51145
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51145&action=edit
Patch in test
This patch is bigger than I wanted it to be as there has been many more uses of
build_nonstandard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88252
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #10 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Created attachment 51143 [details]
> A patch
>
> Try this instead.
This also works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101430
Bug ID: 101430
Summary: Passing a lambda as a template argument causes
internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101407
--- Comment #4 from Toolybird ---
Your patch solves the problem for me. Thank you very much!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101361
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
By the way, i think if _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE==0, it should be just an
__builtin_abort(). This will make optimizers much happier. The bounds checking
will be only once.
https://godbolt.org/z/7MxMoe3Yn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
Bug ID: 101429
Summary: __replacement_assert should be marked as noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79501
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
commit r12-2260-g8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
commit r12-2260-g8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96697
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > Shall we do that as a specific matcher or e.g. in the ranger once it gets
> > code for symbolic comparisons? I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
This issue still exists in trunk. "-fno-builtin-abort" can be used as a
workaround for SpiderMonkey though.
Any progress?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d980e84240c82502661758fbecd5f456018ea89
commit r12-2259-g8d980e84240c82502661758fbecd5f456018ea89
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1539b797a06e03b08e1f1de28ad0d19a3956616
commit r12-2258-ga1539b797a06e03b08e1f1de28ad0d19a3956616
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101411
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101411
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d4393af9d2b37b78eb5b1f84f5d4da3a6f7fba6
commit r12-2257-g9d4393af9d2b37b78eb5b1f84f5d4da3a6f7fba6
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101397
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101415
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Just for the record, started with r9-2475-g4864297f7858617a.
That definitely looks more like it was exposing the issue really as that was to
VRP while the fix in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code with -O2: |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51851
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101402
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101199
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91050
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51144
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51144&action=edit
gcc12-pr101419.patch
Updated patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51142|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
yeah, it because we have been treating casts to objects of the same precision
as equivalences.This normally works fine, but in this case we have
c_9 = (int)_2 c_9 == _2
_3 = c_9 - 10 so _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 51142 [details]
> A patch
>
> Can't you use one single local_cpu_detect and pass it 2 arguments (arch/tune
> and 32/64) instead of just one (arc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 51142
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51142
A patch
Can't you use one single local_cpu_detect and pass it 2 arguments (arch/tune
and 32/64) instead of just one (ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51125|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101199
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fedcf3c476aff7533741a1c61071200f0a38cf83
commit r12-2254-gfedcf3c476aff7533741a1c61071200f0a38cf83
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
>
> --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101406
Marc Mutz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Marc Mutz ---
Ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101421
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Ofer Shinaar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ofer.shinaar at wdc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> Well, my point was to avoid pessimizing the VN done from cunrolli ;)
> Of course any duplication / threading can improve __bos precision,
> but then any tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101398
--- Comment #2 from Will Cohen ---
Created attachment 51141
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51141&action=edit
The uv_irq.i file
The uv_irq.i file was created from 98f7fdced2e0efb1599a37b3e57671a7884f3a25 of
git://git.kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
>
> --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
>
> --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I agree about most of the passes you are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|ian at airs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
--- Comment #7 from Simon Willcocks ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Moving the line is the right fix
Thanks for the confirmation.
> It is recommended to initialize normal automatic variables first and then
> only initialize re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Note usually we still run all property providers but the way you set
> the property outside of pass->properties_provided breaks this. Thus
> maybe split objs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I agree about most of the passes you are moving, but I have an (albeit
artificial) testcase that proves that cunrolli does affect objsz:
__SIZE_TYPE__ a[10];
void
foo (void)
{
char *p = __builtin_malloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 51139 [details]
> > gcc12-pr101419.patch
> >
> > Full untested patch.
>
> I guess that'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 51139 [details]
> gcc12-pr101419.patch
>
> Full untested patch.
I guess that's certainly what was intended (and after the patch more expl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
I think none of
NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unrolli);
NEXT_PASS (pass_backprop);
NEXT_PASS (pass_phiprop);
NEXT_PASS (pass_forwprop);
are useful for objsize so IMHO we should move pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The above patch will slightly pessimize optimizations during the
NEXT_PASS (pass_remove_cgraph_callee_edges);
/* Initial scalar cleanups before alias computation.
They ensure memory acce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/tree-pass.h.jj 2021-01-27 10:10:00.525903635 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-pass.h 2021-07-12 13:10:59.621933276 +0200
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ protected:
#define PROP_gimple_lcf(1 << 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101338
--- Comment #2 from Josip Palavra ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> All your examples are missing a semi-colon after the struct definition.
Oops, thanks for pointing that out! The problem persists even with all the
semicolons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101318
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96851
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobias.bruell at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101318
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101268
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks. Please submit patches to the mailing lists as required by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches
Please capitalize "an" at the start of every sentence, and use markdown `...`
instead of @c .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101343
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101338
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86-64 |
Build|Homebrew GCC 11.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101344
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is the cunrolli pass where things go wrong (it VNs the &u->c for both
__builtin_object_size calls while previously only the first one was &u->c and
the second was &u->i).
Now, objsz2 obviously needs to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101402
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Nothing can "fix" __builtin_object_size here (on sub-objects) without changing
how we represent and CSE addresses, esp. if you consider inlining where we
want to interpret __builtin_object_size (p, ..) as h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101406
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101427
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Summary|std::get sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||siddhesh at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778
Bug 100778 depends on bug 101423, which changed state.
Bug 101423 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.c:7113 since r12-1951-ga3aaba68405751ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 101423, which changed state.
Bug 101423 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.c:7113 since r12-1951-ga3aaba68405751ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92343e0ba4d47f21ae20ffcb83d736bdbc15dae0
commit r12-2244-g92343e0ba4d47f21ae20ffcb83d736bdbc15dae0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:123d0a597beb6d9865f808bf15b0d67f2a8fd5b2
commit r12-2243-g123d0a597beb6d9865f808bf15b0d67f2a8fd5b2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101403
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0192c3eedbc7e6fe703abd8b321f400ddb02adf7
commit r12-2242-g0192c3eedbc7e6fe703abd8b321f400ddb02adf7
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/tree-object-size.c.jj 2021-01-04 10:25:39.911221618 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-object-size.c 2021-07-12 11:28:51.328120222 +0200
@@ -1393,6 +1393,11 @@ pass_object_sizes::execute (function *fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6785eb595981abd93ad85edcfdf1d2e43c0841f5
commit r12-2241-g6785eb595981abd93ad85edcfdf1d2e43c0841f5
Author: prathamesh.kulkarn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 101425, which changed state.
Bug 101425 Summary: [12 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow at
candidates_list_and_hint since r12-1903-gaf9987e817f54806
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b8b37d1b6301855213b8d4860feaeb74d464c6b
commit r12-2240-g9b8b37d1b6301855213b8d4860feaeb74d464c6b
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101343
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101398
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Just for the record, started with r9-2475-g4864297f7858617a.
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo