[Bug fortran/101079] [OPENMP] The value of list-item in linear clause in loop construct is not calculated on each iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101079 --- Comment #3 from xiao@compiler-dev.com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Under discussions in OpenMP language committee, but the latest proposal is > that this is invalid, you need to increment the linear variable by > lin

[Bug fortran/101079] [OPENMP] The value of list-item in linear clause in loop construct is not calculated on each iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101079 --- Comment #2 from xiao@compiler-dev.com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Under discussions in OpenMP language committee, but the latest proposal is > that this is invalid, you need to increment the linear variable by > lin

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #6 from Mosè Giordano --- Created attachment 51038 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51038&action=edit Patch to fix the reported issue Please find attached a patch to fix the reported issue. I replaced the bashis

[Bug gcov-profile/80223] RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223 --- Comment #10 from Nick Desaulniers --- Link to kernel patches: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210618233023.1360185-1-ndesaulni...@google.com/

[Bug libstdc++/100387] ranges::minmax compares moved-out value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc9c94d43dcfa98436152af9c00f011e9dab25f6 commit r12-1656-gcc9c94d43dcfa98436152af9c00f011e9dab25f6 Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug c/101131] New: ICE with -O2: in noninterposable_alias, at symtab.c:2011

version 12.0.0 20210618 (experimental) [master revision :9f6824b35:688359a27d835bbdab554fdf5eb207f1bd678371] (GCC) $ cat mutant.c extern_declared_variable; global_defined_function() { static_function(); } __attribute__((ifunc("resolver"))) static_function() { if (extern_declare

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #5 from Mosè Giordano --- Ok, I finally found the culprit: `libsanitizer` does already have a way to add `-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup` to CXXFLAGS, but it uses a bashism:

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #4 from Mosè Giordano --- You're right, in `x86_64-apple-darwin14/libsanitizer/config.log` I can see that `build == x86_64-linux-musl` and `host == target == x86_64-apple-darwin`, but still, in `x86_64-apple-darwin14/libsanitizer` I

[Bug c++/101130] Broken backward compatibility after __attribute__-noexcept order change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101130 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- I think the patch for PR 101014 resolves this testcase... Let me know if this is fixed on trunk now.

[Bug c++/101130] New: Broken backward compatibility after __attribute__-noexcept order change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101130 Bug ID: 101130 Summary: Broken backward compatibility after __attribute__-noexcept order change Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 101014, which changed state. Bug 101014 Summary: [12 Regression] Big compile time hog with -O3 since r12-1268-g9858cd1a6827ee7a https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/101014] [12 Regression] Big compile time hog with -O3 since r12-1268-g9858cd1a6827ee7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/101014] [12 Regression] Big compile time hog with -O3 since r12-1268-g9858cd1a6827ee7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:870b674f72d4894b94efa61764fd87ecec29ffde commit r12-1652-g870b674f72d4894b94efa61764fd87ecec29ffde Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug libstdc++/95833] Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking a binary functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/95833] Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking a binary functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae17634d5fce496a50477eb0199f1eda8249622f commit r9-9594-gae17634d5fce496a50477eb0199f1eda8249622f Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Optimized difference: --- pr101129.c.244t.optimized.r11-5838 2021-06-18 22:40:20.915971652 +0200 +++ pr101129.c.244t.optimized.r11-5839 2021-06-18 22:40:34.739789553 +0200 @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ void foo0 (u32 u3

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] wrong|[11/12 Regression] wrong

[Bug target/100777] MMA builtin usage ICEs when used in a #pragma omp parallel and using -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100777 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99842] MMA test case ICEs using -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99842 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Mosè Giordano from comment #2) > GCC uses libtool checks to set these flags: > h=1d9ae59be6798555b7020a66e0f622ff8bf752cc;

[Bug libstdc++/80196] fenv_t not declared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196 Guillaume changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gr.audio at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #2 from Mosè Giordano --- I've gathered some more information. In LLVM, libsanitizer uses -Wl,-U, to allow the macOS linker accept undefined symbols and mimic ELF weak symbols, see

[Bug c++/80431] Use of "this" pointer in member initializer causes constructor not to be called (or ICE on gcc 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80431 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Ev

[Bug c/101125] warn when a construct would become invalid if a function were replaced by a function-like macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101125 --- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre --- Even though GCC support fast inline functions, some libraries may still use function-like macros. In particular, this is still the case with glibc (e.g. pthread_cleanup_pop).

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Component|rtl-optimizatio

[Bug rtl-optimization/101129] New: [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1

pported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210618 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c084361a5a800ee0920bf29b6673816d2b35e76 commit r10-9946-g0c084361a5a800ee0920bf29b6673816d2b35e76 Author: Harald Anlauf D

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c084361a5a800ee0920bf29b6673816d2b35e76 commit r10-9946-g0c084361a5a800ee0920bf29b6673816d2b35e76 Author: Harald Anlauf D

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:067e45a6f376582b1d3d36cc9b2124b60093b5c2 commit r11-8622-g067e45a6f376582b1d3d36cc9b2124b60093b5c2 Author: Harald Anlauf D

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:067e45a6f376582b1d3d36cc9b2124b60093b5c2 commit r11-8622-g067e45a6f376582b1d3d36cc9b2124b60093b5c2 Author: Harald Anlauf D

[Bug c++/92752] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "ignored qualifiers" warning on const-qualified pointer-to-member-function objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92752 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0, 8.4.0,

[Bug target/101128] DFP support for aarch64 is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101128 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Bug 91985 was the bug that DFP constants were wrongly accepted by older GCC versions on architectures lacking DFP support.

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug middle-end/100755] Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/95833] Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking a binary functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a37d5c0bd3451104ddab85f69ec37b50d31fa7f commit r10-9945-g3a37d5c0bd3451104ddab85f69ec37b50d31fa7f Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug d/101127] d: Compile-time reflection for supported built-ins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101127 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- There's the language hook LANG_HOOKS_BUILTIN_FUNCTION_EXT_SCOPE, which seems to do what we want on the surface, but then there's a question over whether this is to be correct. --- // static condition is false

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fc543396345900f460c9fa7121239cb1ebbc3a3 commit r12-1650-g6fc543396345900f460c9fa7121239cb1ebbc3a3 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: F

[Bug fortran/100283] [11/12 Regression] Call to MIN0 with integer(8) arguments raises an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100283 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fc543396345900f460c9fa7121239cb1ebbc3a3 commit r12-1650-g6fc543396345900f460c9fa7121239cb1ebbc3a3 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: F

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhongyunde at huawei dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/101119] Missing the check about modify global variable for __attribute__((const)) function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101119 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c/101125] warn when a construct would become invalid if a function were replaced by a function-like macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101125 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug target/96253] decimal floating point missing on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-18 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/96253] decimal floating point missing on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caparson at uwaterloo dot ca --- Comment

[Bug target/101128] DFP support for aarch64 is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101128 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101128] Decimal floating point fails on ARM with gcc-10/11 but works with gcc-6/7/8/9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101128 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Target|

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is clearly a FE bug: gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmax does: if (TREE_CODE (type) == INTEGER_TYPE) se->expr = fold_build1_loc (input_location, FIX_TRUNC_EXPR, type, mvar); else se->expr = convert (t

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested potential fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c index 73b0bcc9dea..e578449995a 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/tran

[Bug c/101128] New: Decimal floating point fails on ARM with gcc-10/11 but works with gcc-6/7/8/9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101128 Bug ID: 101128 Summary: Decimal floating point fails on ARM with gcc-10/11 but works with gcc-6/7/8/9 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Domi

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why on Earth would somebody really want to combine legacy MAX0 with IMPLICIT INTEGER*4 and -fdefault-integer-8? Reduced testcase: SUBROUTINE TEST IMPLICIT INTEGER*4 (I-N) MAXMN

[Bug libstdc++/95833] Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking a binary functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe918041ce9809755a7e1b2f62071c2b27829610 commit r11-8621-gfe918041ce9809755a7e1b2f62071c2b27829610 Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug target/99939] CMSE: -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve does not support CMSE correctly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99939 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100856] Arm: Multilib mapping is missing for CDE arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100856 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101016] Arm: vld1q polymorphic variants failing with undefined reference to `__ARM_undef` error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug d/101127] New: d: Compile-time reflection for supported built-ins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101127 Bug ID: 101127 Summary: d: Compile-time reflection for supported built-ins Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/100856] Arm: Multilib mapping is missing for CDE arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100856 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5384e746639b2d4084a95605f7be1ef45395768 commit r10-9944-ge5384e746639b2d4084a95605f7be1ef45395768 Author: Srinath

[Bug target/101016] Arm: vld1q polymorphic variants failing with undefined reference to `__ARM_undef` error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ea29759feb45c4418a2eebb212368f49e3e179d commit r10-9943-g9ea29759feb45c4418a2eebb212368f49e3e179d Author: Srinath

[Bug target/100856] Arm: Multilib mapping is missing for CDE arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100856 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85f85b7e62aacc6abae475932cf483a4c80176ce commit r11-8620-g85f85b7e62aacc6abae475932cf483a4c80176ce Author: Srinath

[Bug target/101016] Arm: vld1q polymorphic variants failing with undefined reference to `__ARM_undef` error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4eafcd3d3b0dade7b61468dc546bcfadf8993ef commit r11-8619-gd4eafcd3d3b0dade7b61468dc546bcfadf8993ef Author: Srinath

[Bug c++/101126] New: Enabling modules suppresses creation of precompiled headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101126 Bug ID: 101126 Summary: Enabling modules suppresses creation of precompiled headers Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/101118] coroutines: unexpected ODR warning for coroutine frame type in LTO builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101118 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Nils Gladitz from comment #3) > Thanks for looking into this! just speculation so far ... > Any idea what the potential implications are? Not yet. > I assume I can't just ignore the warning as

[Bug c++/101118] coroutines: unexpected ODR warning for coroutine frame type in LTO builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101118 --- Comment #3 from Nils Gladitz --- Thanks for looking into this! Any idea what the potential implications are? I assume I can't just ignore the warning as this will likely break code? When I turn off LTO the diagnostic will go away but the OD

[Bug libstdc++/100384] Compiling in c++17 mode breaks compilation of functions named visit()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100384 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100630] Unexpected implicit conversion from volatile bool& to std::filesystem::path in gcc <= 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/91488] [9/10 Regression] char_traits::length causes "inlining failed in call to always_inline" error with -fgnu-tm -O2 -std=c++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/99006] make_shared silently works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99006 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/100630] Unexpected implicit conversion from volatile bool& to std::filesystem::path in gcc <= 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c805829c9023da48db6d636221fd79612dff7ea commit r9-9593-g3c805829c9023da48db6d636221fd79612dff7ea Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/100384] Compiling in c++17 mode breaks compilation of functions named visit()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100384 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91d29ed563bd7e787921f997ea2f80cd87ee59b2 commit r9-9592-g91d29ed563bd7e787921f997ea2f80cd87ee59b2 Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug libstdc++/99006] make_shared silently works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99006 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79fa567e234585dc6a71f9bd069101c993513f3e commit r9-9591-g79fa567e234585dc6a71f9bd069101c993513f3e Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/91488] [9/10 Regression] char_traits::length causes "inlining failed in call to always_inline" error with -fgnu-tm -O2 -std=c++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc44169fc7bc7552eb85f143f4fee9c8bcdd5e49 commit r9-9590-gcc44169fc7bc7552eb85f143f4fee9c8bcdd5e49 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug c/101125] New: warn when a construct would become invalid if a function were replaced by a function-like macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101125 Bug ID: 101125 Summary: warn when a construct would become invalid if a function were replaced by a function-like macro Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/95833] Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking a binary functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0532452dcd17910dfd3d2b0df50dfe3ef1194bf7 commit r12-1645-g0532452dcd17910dfd3d2b0df50dfe3ef1194bf7 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/95833] Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking a binary functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/101124] New: [12 Regression] pair(0, 0) was intended to be deprecated, but is rejected now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101124 Bug ID: 101124 Summary: [12 Regression] pair(0, 0) was intended to be deprecated, but is rejected now Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/101112] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/101122] ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101122 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-18 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/101121] [12 Regression] 416.gamess grd2b.f does not finish building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101121 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 51035 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51035&action=edit reduced testcase Reduced testcase - it must get still smaller but it only very slowly reduces now.

[Bug c/101122] ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101122 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c/100618] Add a -fno-semantic-interposition variant which allows variable interposition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100618 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME

[Bug fortran/101079] [OPENMP] The value of list-item in linear clause in loop construct is not calculated on each iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101079 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/101123] New: [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 Bug ID: 101123 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/101122] New: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101122 Bug ID: 101122 Summary: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/100384] Compiling in c++17 mode breaks compilation of functions named visit()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100384 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ad4d9b46944db1be6f1b216b5b8e74bd9f66937 commit r10-9937-g8ad4d9b46944db1be6f1b216b5b8e74bd9f66937 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/99006] make_shared silently works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99006 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36d6e7fe997aa85dc64b13ce4bb3c2e51e13cd36 commit r10-9936-g36d6e7fe997aa85dc64b13ce4bb3c2e51e13cd36 Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug c++/101119] Missing the check about modify global variable for __attribute__((const)) function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101119 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99939] CMSE: -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve does not support CMSE correctly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99939 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fd8e3ac9db8aed59db610b29d83a49b89a638c1 commit r10-9935-g0fd8e3ac9db8aed59db610b29d83a49b89a638c1 Author: Srinath P

[Bug target/99939] CMSE: -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve does not support CMSE correctly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99939 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94d5c3a781ccfb70d5b0c2401be8a5bb7af396bb commit r11-8618-g94d5c3a781ccfb70d5b0c2401be8a5bb7af396bb Author: Srinath P

[Bug target/100856] Arm: Multilib mapping is missing for CDE arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100856 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f58d03b5df25f9eab06b7eacea8da780fc2e0219 commit r12-1644-gf58d03b5df25f9eab06b7eacea8da780fc2e0219 Author: Srinath Parvathan

[Bug tree-optimization/101120] vn_reference_maybe_forwprop_address can take much compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101120 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 51034 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51034&action=edit patch That fixes the attached but we also have loads of dead loads around which exposes the IV opts issue at

[Bug libstdc++/91488] [9/10 Regression] char_traits::length causes "inlining failed in call to always_inline" error with -fgnu-tm -O2 -std=c++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7cf6b97fc3f6c02a5d0114fed14f40b08ab3ad8 commit r10-9932-gb7cf6b97fc3f6c02a5d0114fed14f40b08ab3ad8 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug tree-optimization/101121] [12 Regression] 416.gamess grd2b.f does not finish building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/101121] New: [12 Regression] 416.gamess grd2b.f does not finish building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101121 Bug ID: 101121 Summary: [12 Regression] 416.gamess grd2b.f does not finish building Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/101112] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

  1   2   >