https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-10
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101001
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O3 on|[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
>
> --- Comment #17 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021, public at timruffing dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
>
> Tim Ruffing changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
Bug ID: 101008
Summary: ICE: in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6594 with
-O -g
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
Bug ID: 101007
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mno-sse2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100937
--- Comment #6 from Fangrui Song ---
Then can you add a -fvisibility=protected variant which only applies to
non-weak defined functions?
Two issues need to be fixed:
(1): https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27973
__attribute__((vi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100939
--- Comment #1 from johnfbennett at protonmail dot com ---
G++ does have a good warning for this scenario:
$ g++ -Wall misplacedattribute.c
misplacedattribute.c: In function ‘int main()’:
misplacedattribute.c:7:37: warning: attributes ignored on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
--- Comment #17 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> Changing the signature will not help given we don't want to regress other
> cases.
> Instead we have to somehow remove the pro- and demotions with the help of
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101006
Bug ID: 101006
Summary: Request diagnostic for likely concept syntax errors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101005
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101005
Bug ID: 101005
Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-1342
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100904
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
FWIW the following hackish workaround seems to fix it, though am still
investigating why this is happening.
diff --git a/libcpp/directives.c b/libcpp/directives.c
index f4aa17d1156..b5bdd443a5a 100644
--- a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
We want to use plain TImode instead of V1TImode on newer cpus. It probably is
a good idea (for performance) on p9 already, but this will need testing. That's
only sideways related to this issue though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101004
Bug ID: 101004
Summary: SFINAE constrained conversion operator of class
template parameter type does not work with built-in
arithmetic operators
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to luoxhu from comment #9)
> But for __float128 to __int128 mentioned in #c4, need hack
> rs6000_modes_tieable_p
> to remove the stack operation in dse1. But I am not sure this is *LEGAL*
> since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suochenyao at 163 dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The
> MEM[(struct a *)&l].c = l$c_24;
> in the function to be inlined is there since esra. Arguably it is strange
> that esra stores back into the parameter when it is const.
Right, it's a duplicate of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Perhaps the tree-inline.c change is fine for Ada, but it doesn't seem to be
> safe for C/C++.
You're casting away the const qualifier though, how can this valid C++?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50967|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003
Bug ID: 101003
Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after
r12-1329
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
Bug ID: 101002
Summary: Some powerpc tests fail with -mlong-double-64
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6)
> > And you guessed well! I built a mainline compiler for Gordon with Aaron's
> > commit reverted and the issue goes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6)
> And you guessed well! I built a mainline compiler for Gordon with Aaron's
> commit reverted and the issue goes away. Assigning this to Aaron to debug.
Talking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
It affects gcc-8 to the trunk. Gcc-7 works fine.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 12.0.0 20210609 (experimental) [master revision
174e75a2107:3b61ba37fe1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |acsawdey at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101000
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4faa36e7540c573c5dc17850bcd938d0900b2e9
commit r12-1349-gd4faa36e7540c573c5dc17850bcd938d0900b2e9
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101000
Bug ID: 101000
Summary: ICE when trying to import the
absl/container/flat_hash_map.h as a header module
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > If this is powerpc and on power10, then it is most likely caused by
> > r12-1020.
>
> Not arguing with you, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Consider with the same -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-fre
flags:
const struct S { unsigned b : 4; unsigned c : 9; } d;
__attribute__((noipa)) void foo (void) {}
static int bar (const struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
FYI, I'll give Gordon a build without that patch to test with and see if his
issue goes away with that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, SRA isn't really needed, consider following testcase with
-O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-fre
struct S { unsigned b : 4; unsigned c : 9; } const d;
__attribute__((noipa)) void foo (v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f0d7f322172d411d271aa02024a342c72534465
commit r12-1346-g8f0d7f322172d411d271aa02024a342c72534465
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jun 9 11:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
Tim Ruffing changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public at timruffing dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The difference after IPA between r12-433 and r12-434 is:
--- pr100994.c.092t.fixup_cfg3_ 2021-06-09 14:26:08.0 -0400
+++ pr100994.c.092t.fixup_cfg3 2021-06-09 14:26:28.0 -0400
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|wrong code with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
Bug ID: 100999
Summary: d: foreach over a tuple doesn't work on 16-bit targets
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0ff449baf8d64819badb1883221b5b7295e7406
commit r9-9576-gd0ff449baf8d64819badb1883221b5b7295e7406
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe555102dc224b4d946becc8a9db514ecec66161
commit r9-9575-gfe555102dc224b4d946becc8a9db514ecec66161
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d660f34b6718c5f107fd1f1a2126aec759a6593b
commit r10-9899-gd660f34b6718c5f107fd1f1a2126aec759a6593b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7ece1a32000a9943f5bd5ac597d6ce3829aff8e
commit r10-9898-gf7ece1a32000a9943f5bd5ac597d6ce3829aff8e
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10d4f283f4177d80cec3c9e8bf447a48cab5bb47
commit r11-8536-g10d4f283f4177d80cec3c9e8bf447a48cab5bb47
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6c3ed60276b842114aefce54d73e30e578fdd6d
commit r11-8535-gc6c3ed60276b842114aefce54d73e30e578fdd6d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:036e14ca44eaddf329a79d56d556862118b1f220
commit r12-1345-g036e14ca44eaddf329a79d56d556862118b1f220
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04fea2d66bd680beb1a204e62f2f459307000813
commit r12-1344-g04fea2d66bd680beb1a204e62f2f459307000813
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Bug ID: 100998
Summary: bug in experimental GCC12 with optimization '-O1',
disappears with optimization '-O0'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100695
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As comment 7 already said.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
--- Comment #3 from Felix Morgner ---
Thank you for the quick response. I will file a bug report with Boost GIL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
To make it work just remove the "" in A() {}.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.morgner at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
Bug ID: 100997
Summary: [c++20] parse error when id-expression of constructor
is simple-template-id
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
Nickolay Merkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickolay.merkin at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #9)
> How is this different from raise(SIGTRAP);?
It does an architecture-specific trap instruction, not a SIGTRAP signal.
The former is useful even if you do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100972
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Similarly, the helpful option -Wimplicit-procedure does not warn :
(-Wimplicit-procedure : Warn if a procedure is called that has neither
an explicit interface nor has been declared as EXTERNAL.)
$ gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a0c4eaea320a418400afc4d63359ed6c4af5548
commit r12-1342-g4a0c4eaea320a418400afc4d63359ed6c4af5548
Author: Paul Eggert
Date: Wed Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100989
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100989
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.leroy at csgroup
dot eu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100996
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100996
Bug ID: 100996
Summary: rs6000 p10 vector add-add fusion should work with -m32
but doesn't
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c17b5f8cca82d1957242055991a2c23184a1af1
commit r12-1332-g2c17b5f8cca82d1957242055991a2c23184a1af1
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed Jun 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100992
--- Comment #2 from Amir Kirsh ---
Maybe a dup of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96592
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Bug ID: 100995
Summary: Extend std::is_constant_evaluated in if warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100992
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in info_for_reduction, |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:374f93da97fb0378453d503f3cfea4d7a923a89c
commit r12-1330-g374f93da97fb0378453d503f3cfea4d7a923a89c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Bug ID: 100994
Summary: wrong code with "-O1 -finline-small-functions
-fipa-cp"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96560
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210609 (experimental) [master revision
:c23bc3c72:87f9ac937d6cfd81cbbe0a43518ba10781888d7c] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
__builtin_acc_on_device(dev) { return __builtin_acc_on_device(dev); }
$ gcc-trunk -O2 mutant.c
mutant.c:1:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #6 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FYI Tamar asked me to make sure the instructions were being generated. I
checked and they were, but not being used as it decides to inline MAIN__ and
inlining seems to break (as in not apply/miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a9d8fd580d6afab669bae68e116e2135c2a8670
commit r11-8534-g0a9d8fd580d6afab669bae68e116e2135c2a8670
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100992
Bug ID: 100992
Summary: Wrong result for is_constructible for const ref of
tuple of tuples
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
