[Bug c/100985] New: Aarch64 acle.h "extern "C" {" mismatch "}" in 9.4.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100985 Bug ID: 100985 Summary: Aarch64 acle.h "extern "C" {" mismatch "}" in 9.4.0 Product: gcc Version: 9.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/100981] ICE in info_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/100978] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with -O3 -frename-registers -fno-sched-critical-path-heuristic -fsched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100978 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/100973] gcc does not optimise based on knowing that `_mm256_movemask_ps` returns less than 255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com

[Bug c/100984] gimple-ssa-evrp.c: mismatched new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100984 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/100969] Incorrect debug info for struct under O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100969 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c/100984] New: gimple-ssa-evrp.c: mismatched new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100984 Bug ID: 100984 Summary: gimple-ssa-evrp.c: mismatched new and delete Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/100982] wrong constraint in std::optional::operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 --- Comment #3 from martin --- Created attachment 50968 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50968&action=edit second test case which segfaults Playing around with some variants in select_rank_expression2.f90, I can see that I s

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 --- Comment #2 from martin --- It is releases/gcc-11.1.0: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran-11 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=.../gcc/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11.1.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-repo/configure --pro

[Bug target/100085] Bad code for union transfer from __float128 to vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085 --- Comment #10 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- float128 to vector __int128 is fixed by: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=f700e4b0ee3ef53b48975cf89be26b9177e3a3f3

[Bug c++/100983] New: Deduction guide for member template class rejected at class scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983 Bug ID: 100983 Summary: Deduction guide for member template class rejected at class scope Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/100982] New: wrong constraint in std::optional::operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982 Bug ID: 100982 Summary: wrong constraint in std::optional::operator= Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lib

[Bug target/100981] New: ICE in info_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981 Bug ID: 100981 Summary: ICE in info_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4897 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/100980] New: [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 Bug ID: 100980 Summary: [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/100925] [12 Regression] tree check fail in make_range_step with -O1 in reassoc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/100796] [11 Regression] GCC does not honor #pragma diagnostic ignored when using the integrated preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |-fno

[Bug c++/89062] class template argument deduction failure with parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brycelelbach at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/100979] Nested CTAD fails when the outer object is direct initialized and the inner object is list initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100979 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/100879] [10/11/12 Regression] gcc is complaining of a signed compare when comparing enums of different types (same underlying type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|12.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100879] [10/11/12 Regression] gcc is complaining of a signed compare when comparing enums of different types (same underlying type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:087253b9951766cbd93286b804ebb1ab59197aa8 commit r12-1314-g087253b9951766cbd93286b804ebb1ab59197aa8 Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug c++/100956] Unused variable warnings ignore "if constexpr" blocks where variables are conditionally used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100956 --- Comment #2 from Matt Bentley --- Thank you - I'm aware GCC might optimize it out (and failed to test with GCC10), at least in O2 mode, but other compilers might not, hence the code.

[Bug libstdc++/100889] Wrong param type for std::atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100889 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski --- Without load/store handling, here are the following optimizations that either can move to match.pd already or need some extra work to do it: * value_replacement: need to handle !single_non_singleton_phi_for

[Bug libstdc++/100889] Wrong param type for std::atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100889 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7462945387b33744f665d1aa33ba1cec79c03b0 commit r11-8528-gd7462945387b33744f665d1aa33ba1cec79c03b0 Author: Thomas Rodgers

[Bug libstdc++/100889] Wrong param type for std::atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100889 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25e5ecdf82b49977e86bfaded236fb34af2705ed commit r12-1312-g25e5ecdf82b49977e86bfaded236fb34af2705ed Author: Thomas Rodgers Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski --- Note this is not fully fixed, there is still some more work to do to deal with the non single_non_singleton_phi_for_edges case which will allow to get rid of value_replacement. Note to get rid of early_p ch

[Bug c++/100979] New: Nested CTAD fails when the outer object is direct initialized and the inner object is list initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100979 Bug ID: 100979 Summary: Nested CTAD fails when the outer object is direct initialized and the inner object is list initialized Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/100065] Conditional explicit doesn't work for deduction guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed on trunk so far, will backport.

[Bug c++/100065] Conditional explicit doesn't work for deduction guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1afa4facb9348cac0349ff9c30066aa25a3608f7 commit r12-1310-g1afa4facb9348cac0349ff9c30066aa25a3608f7 Author: Marek Polacek Date: M

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4574d23cb07340918793a5a98ae7bb2988b3791 commit r12-1309-gc4574d23cb07340918793a5a98ae7bb2988b3791 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: T

[Bug middle-end/54400] recognize vector reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (note avoiding hadd in the reduc pattern was intended). Indeed. Except with -Os, or if a processor with a fast hadd appears, vectorising this doesn't bring anythi

[Bug rtl-optimization/80770] suboptimal code negating a 1-bit _Bool field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80770 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Severity|normal

[Bug c++/100879] [10/11/12 Regression] gcc is complaining of a signed compare when comparing enums of different types (same underlying type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug target/57890] gcc 4.8.1 regression: loops become slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/49203] missed-optimization: useless expressions not moved out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/91706] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree

[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- As I mentioned on IRC, it seems like this may just be a matter of properly passing down flags/member_p in the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator.

[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Duh, we don't defer parsing of noexcept for any ptr-operator, like struct S { int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i)); int i; }; Awkward, but the fix should be simple.

[Bug c++/100976] [C++23] Make constexpr reference temp constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Or rather, int main() { constexpr const int &r = 42; static_assert(r == 42); // { dg-bogus "" } } [expr.const]/4.7 says that "a temporary object of non-volatile const-qualified literal type whose lifet

[Bug target/100973] gcc does not optimise based on knowing that `_mm256_movemask_ps` returns less than 255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100973 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50967 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50967&action=edit Tentativ fix This patch would fix the testcase. It is inspired by code in primary.c, match_string_

[Bug analyzer/99212] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c line 971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |gcc.d

[Bug libstdc++/100940] views::take and views::drop should not define _S_has_simple_extra_args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/100940] views::take and views::drop should not define _S_has_simple_extra_args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to TC from comment #4) > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3) > > Good point, confirmed. Though I'm not sure if perfect forwarding here is > > strictly necessary to fix this testcase. Perh

[Bug analyzer/99212] [11/12 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c line 971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3b1ef7a83c0c0cd5b20a1dd1714b868f3d2b442 commit r12-1303-gd3b1ef7a83c0c0cd5b20a1dd1714b868f3d2b442 Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug c++/100976] [C++23] Make constexpr reference temp constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- constexpr const int &r = 42; static_assert(r == 42);

[Bug c++/100975] [C++23] Allow pointer to array of auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100975 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- int a[3]; auto (*p)[3] = &a;

[Bug rtl-optimization/100978] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with -O3 -frename-registers -fno-sched-critical-path-heuristic -f

/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-1295-20210608150918-g7a56d3d3e99-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210608 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug preprocessor/100904] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong line location #include error "No such file or directory" – line + 1 [traditional mode as used by gfortran]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100904 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Setting a breakpoint in gfc_simplify_len, it appears that the substring length is not properly set: (gdb) p e->ref->type $4 = REF_SUBSTRING (gdb) p *e->ref->u.ss.start->value.integer._mp_d $15 =

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/93955] detect conversion from pointer type to arithmetic type in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93955 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/100977] New: [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 Bug ID: 100977 Summary: [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100976] [C++23] Make constexpr reference temp constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100975] [C++23] Allow pointer to array of auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever co

[Bug c++/100976] New: [C++23] Make constexpr reference temp constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976 Bug ID: 100976 Summary: [C++23] Make constexpr reference temp constexpr Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/100974] [C++23] Implement if consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/100975] New: [C++23] Allow pointer to array of auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100975 Bug ID: 100975 Summary: [C++23] Allow pointer to array of auto Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/100974] New: [C++23] Implement if consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974 Bug ID: 100974 Summary: [C++23] Implement if consteval Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:09:05PM +, gs...@t-online.de wrote: > > It should be valid, type-spec is explicitly given and the ac-values > are type compatible (see e.g. F2018 7.8). With len(x(1:2))==2 the >

[Bug c++/100963] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 regression: templated constructor with std::initializer_list is not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100963 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100973] New: gcc does not optimise based on knowing that `_mm256_movemask_ps` returns less than 255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100973 Bug ID: 100973 Summary: gcc does not optimise based on knowing that `_mm256_movemask_ps` returns less than 255 Product: gcc Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10) Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/100963] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 regression: templated constructor with std::initializer_list is not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100963 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5af06ce836d4d8d1654db3855db8b86a994faf49 commit r11-8526-g5af06ce836d4d8d1654db3855db8b86a994faf49 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100963] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 regression: templated constructor with std::initializer_list is not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100963 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91349e57bbfd010156b9128b2ad751c8843e7245 commit r12-1299-g91349e57bbfd010156b9128b2ad751c8843e7245 Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug preprocessor/100904] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong line location #include error "No such file or directory" – line + 1 [traditional mode as used by gfortran]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100904 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08 CC|

[Bug fortran/53653] [IR Tracking] Disallow abstract/unlimited-polymorphic types in array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53653 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #3 from G.

[Bug fortran/100972] New: Missing error with "implicit none (external)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100972 Bug ID: 100972 Summary: Missing error with "implicit none (external)" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug fortran/100971] New: ICE: Bad IO basetype (7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100971 Bug ID: 100971 Summary: ICE: Bad IO basetype (7) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assig

[Bug fortran/100970] New: ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100970 Bug ID: 100970 Summary: ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #5 from G. Steinmetz --- It should be valid, type-spec is explicitly given and the ac-values are type compatible (see e.g. F2018 7.8). With len(x(1:2))==2 the following simplified example works : $ cat zz1.f90 program p print *

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/100920] bogus warnings with -Wscalar-storage-order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100920 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > Raising one for these cases is really problematic. Functions using void in > stead of an explicit type are explicitly saying that the type does not > matter. There never is a warning for any other type wh

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08 Status|UN

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/100969] New: Incorrect debug info for struct under O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100969 Bug ID: 100969 Summary: Incorrect debug info for struct under O1 optimization Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug libstdc++/100947] gthr-default.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100947 --- Comment #2 from Keith Clifford --- The configure command is: configure --build=i686-w64-mingw32 --host=i686-w64-mingw32 --target=arm-eabi --enable-__cxa_atexit --with-pkgversion=Tranaptic-2021/06/06-12:09:39 --with-bugurl=none --enable-lang

[Bug fortran/100965] [OpenMP] ICE: Error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100965 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50965 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50965&action=edit gcc12-pr100965.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/100965] [OpenMP] ICE: Error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100965 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug tree-optimization/81815] Invalid conditional reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81815 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/66623] Unsafe FP math reduction used in strict math mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66623 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/59546] wrong behavior with reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59546 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57952] AVX/AVX2 no ymm registers used in a trivial reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57952 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.0 Resolution|---

[Bug target/58790] [missed optimization] reduction of masks of builtin vectors not transformed to ptest or movemask instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58790 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- I'm still not familiar with this part of GCC, but isn't `_2 == { -1, -1, -1, -1 }` equivalent to _1, i.e. it reverses VEC_COND_EXPR? However, if the `==` is supposed to return a scalar boolean instead

[Bug other/100968] New: libiberty: stuck in infinite loop in nm-new while demangling rust symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100968 Bug ID: 100968 Summary: libiberty: stuck in infinite loop in nm-new while demangling rust symbols Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 58821, which changed state. Bug 58821 Summary: conditional reduction does not vectorize https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58821 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/58821] conditional reduction does not vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58821 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug target/58790] [missed optimization] reduction of masks of builtin vectors not transformed to ptest or movemask instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58790 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug inline-asm/100953] Add memory clobbers just for reads or just for writes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100953 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Sure :-) But syntactically it probably is best put amongst the clobbers, all code parsing that already knows about handling various special cases of syntax (well, just "memory" and "cc", and the variou

[Bug target/100962] Poor optimization of AVR code when using structs in __flash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100962 --- Comment #3 from mojo at world3 dot net --- Apologies, I noticed I had -Og on. Tried with -O3 and it optimised the struct away. With -O2 it uses the Z register with displacement, reading data from flash. So it seems that only -Og produces poo

[Bug debug/100852] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -Og -fif-conversion -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100852 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Eve

[Bug target/100962] Poor optimization of AVR code when using structs in __flash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100962 --- Comment #2 from mojo at world3 dot net --- avr-gcc-11.1.0-x64-windows>bin\avr-gcc -Og -xc -Wall -mmcu=atxmega64a1u test.c avr-gcc-11.1.0-x64-windows>bin\avr-objdump -h -S a.out > list.s Still producing code like this 2de: 18 97

[Bug middle-end/54400] recognize vector reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/91706] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46c1a9f6d03ab444b42c41067597e3fbfba38486 commit r11-8524-g46c1a9f6d03ab444b42c41067597e3fbfba38486 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100963] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 regression: templated constructor with std::initializer_list is not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100963 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/100923] [9/10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100923 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] wrong

[Bug tree-optimization/100923] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100923 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a56d3d3e99cc77ad8a6a674870c814da6225675 commit r12-1295-g7a56d3d3e99cc77ad8a6a674870c814da6225675 Author: Richard Biener Date:

  1   2   >