[Bug c++/100129] New: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer

: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210416 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; s

[Bug c++/99722] [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Lelyakin --- All so far found examples of such error message change its behavior if you add the parameter: --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 Most of them to the error message: ICE in hashtab_chk_error.

[Bug c++/100002] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from A

[Bug target/89606] Extra mov after structure load instructions on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89606 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84547] Suboptimal code for int128 masked shifts (ARM64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84547 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Suboptimal code for masked |Suboptimal code for int128

[Bug c++/99926] Parameter packs and variadic arguments: Clang, gcc, and msvc differ on this one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99926 --- Comment #2 from Matt Hurd --- FWIW, MSVC claims to have fixed their bug in version 16.10 Preview 2, leaving just gcc generating incorrect code. https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/parameter-packs-and-variadic-arguments-clang-gcc-a/

[Bug c++/100111] [10 Regression] `-fno-elide-constructors` with `constexpr` ctors causes ICE in GCC 10.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100111 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug libfortran/99210] X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99210 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug fortran/66499] Letters with accents change format behavior for X and T descriptors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66499 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug fortran/69360] loop optimization produces invalid code when a common array has dimension 1 in some files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/100124] Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > The reason why G++ rejects structs with a flexible array as the sole member > is because GCC (in C mode) doesn't accept them. Git log indicates that GCC > starte

[Bug libstdc++/100128] New: Behavior and performance depends on order of ctype.h and stdlib.h include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100128 Bug ID: 100128 Summary: Behavior and performance depends on order of ctype.h and stdlib.h include Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/100124] Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055942.html

[Bug fortran/100098] Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100098 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html

[Bug fortran/100097] Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html

[Bug fortran/100094] Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > Isn't the code invalid Fortran because it references an undefined pointer? > If yes, the compiler is allows to do whatever it wants with the code. AFAIK th

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html

[Bug c++/98767] Function signature lost in concept diagnostic message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98767 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/69360] loop optimization produces invalid code when a common array has dimension 1 in some files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 --- Comment #4 from John Northall --- O dear - that makes gfortran unusable on many existing codes - not really satisfactory is it? John On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08 PM pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gc

[Bug middle-end/93100] gcc -fsanitize=address inhibits -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100 Bug 93100 depends on bug 98508, which changed state. Bug 98508 Summary: Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/93100] gcc -fsanitize=address inhibits -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||awdawdawdawq123123 at gmx dot de --- Com

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 98508, which changed state. Bug 98508 Summary: Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/98508] Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/93100] gcc -fsanitize=address inhibits -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.1, 11.0, 9.3.0 CC|

[Bug c++/100127] New: [coroutines] internal compiler error compiling promise with custom awaiter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100127 Bug ID: 100127 Summary: [coroutines] internal compiler error compiling promise with custom awaiter Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/63545] ICE when building GCC for ia64-hp-hpux11.23 in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89976] [9/10/11 Regression] missing -Wuninitialized for struct member due to sra and TREE_NO_WARNING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Summary|miss

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #213 from Andrew Pin

[Bug bootstrap/64919] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski --- It has been 2 years, does this still happen?

[Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|9.2.0 |4.3.0, 4.8.4, 4.9.4, 5.5.0,

[Bug fortran/69360] loop optimization produces invalid code when a common array has dimension 1 in some files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnnorthall263 at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug fortran/100123] -ftree-fre gives incorrect result in subroutine with array declared as length 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100123 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 89733, which changed state. Bug 89733 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] -Wuninitialized false positive with unclear message pointing to a class name https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89733 What|Re

[Bug regression/89733] [8/9/10/11 Regression] -Wuninitialized false positive with unclear message pointing to a class name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89733 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/100124] Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/100124] Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I will let someone comment on the flexible array extension. But I will note GCC treats (all) arrays at the end of a POD struct as a flexible one so the question I have is more about the ubsan issue you are

[Bug tree-optimization/85804] [8/9 Regression][AArch64] Mis-compilation of loop with strided array access and xor reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85804 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0, 11.0 Summary|[8/9/10/11

[Bug tree-optimization/100126] missing -Wuninitialized using a trivial member of class with another nontrivial member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100126 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/100126] New: missing -Wuninitialized using a trivial member of class with another nontrivial member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100126 Bug ID: 100126 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized using a trivial member of class with another nontrivial member Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug preprocessor/100125] New: -Wunused-macros generated while should be ignored; if undef is seen?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100125 Bug ID: 100125 Summary: -Wunused-macros generated while should be ignored; if undef is seen? Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100085] Bad code for union transfer from __float128 to vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085 --- Comment #4 from Steven Munroe --- I am seeing this a similar problem with union transfers from __float128 to __int128. static inline unsigned __int128 vec_xfer_bin128_2_int128t (__binary128 f128) { __VF_128 vunion;

[Bug c/100124] New: Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124 Bug ID: 100124 Summary: Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/88175] GCC should not warn within implicit copy-constructor (or should report the implicit function in a special way)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17

[Bug fortran/100123] New: -ftree-fre gives incorrect result in subroutine with array declared as length 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100123 Bug ID: 100123 Summary: -ftree-fre gives incorrect result in subroutine with array declared as length 1 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/49213] [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213 Vladimir Fuka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/96770] -mpure-code produces suboptimal code for relocations with small offset for thumb-1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96770 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0754a104bed7c8a937f0623ad15ca03387131210 commit r11-8227-g0754a104bed7c8a937f0623ad15ca03387131210 Author: Christophe Lyon Date:

[Bug c++/74762] [8/9/10/11 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (C++, parenthesized expr, TREE_NO_WARNING)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0, 7.3.0, 8.3.0,

[Bug c/100121] RFE: plugin support for -Wformat via __attribute__((format()))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100121 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to PR 8294. Also I think this project is referenced in PR 47781 even.

[Bug libstdc++/100117] FAIL testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/49745.cc with trunk glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/99479] [modules] ICE Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Lelyakin --- However adding parameter: --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 turns this error to PR99861 ICE in hashtab_chk_error /usr/local/bin/g++ --param=hash-table-verification-limit=$N -std=c++20 -f

[Bug c++/100122] template substitution triggers a segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100122 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99479] [modules] ICE Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus

lus Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210416 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. Ther

[Bug target/91710] [9/10 Regression] unexpected ABI change note since r9-5650

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91710 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] |une

[Bug target/91710] [9/10/11 Regression] unexpected ABI change note since r9-5650

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91710 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49813aad3292f7f2bef69206274da78a9a7116ed commit r11-8226-g49813aad3292f7f2bef69206274da78a9a7116ed Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug tree-optimization/100081] [11 Regression] Compile time hog in irange since r11-4135-ge864d395b4e862ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100081 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/99948] [modules] ICE in add_mergeable_specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99948 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Lelyakin --- Adding parameter: --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 turns this error to PR99861 ICE in hashtab_chk_error

[Bug c++/100122] New: template substitution triggers a segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100122 Bug ID: 100122 Summary: template substitution triggers a segfault Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/100081] [11 Regression] Compile time hog in irange since r11-4135-ge864d395b4e862ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100081 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod --- OMG. Don't bother reducing. I can see the problem. EVRP is fine, but when wrestrict runs, its quite late, and the CFG has [local count: 28382607]: <...> _571 = _61 >= _593; _3583 = &arr_724 + _399

[Bug tree-optimization/63446] dangling reference results in confusing diagnostic from -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63446 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-10-03 00:00:00 |2021-4-16 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/100115] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100115 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization CC|

[Bug c++/100109] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression 'E' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100109 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r251433.

[Bug jit/100096] libgccjit.so.0: Cannot write-enable text segment: Permission denied on NetBSD 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100096 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a1493f0603262a7dc1114d9827353e9810e63dc commit r11-8225-g4a1493f0603262a7dc1114d9827353e9810e63dc Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/100109] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression 'E' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100109 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99803] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:4057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99803 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/40976] Merge DECL of procedure call with DECL of gfc_get_function_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40976 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93956] Wrong array creation with p => array_dt(1:n)%component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/95101] Optimize libgfortran library handling of arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95101 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug fortran/90536] Spurious (?) warning when using -Wconversion with -fno-range-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90536 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67202] Fortran FE should load scalar pass-by-reference intent-in arguments at the beginning of a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67202 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug fortran/83927] Type-Bound Procedure on element of Derived Type PARAMETER Array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83927 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/97454] Decls for Fortran library procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97454 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug fortran/96216] Gap in interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96216 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/30609] Calculating masks twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30609 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93114] Use span passing components of derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93114 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug fortran/82215] Feature request to better support two pass compiling with gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/92913] Add argument-mismatch check for INTERFACE for non-module procedures in the same file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/98076] Increase speed of integer I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98076 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94978] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Bogus warning "Array reference at (1) out of bounds in loop beginning at (2)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94978 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug target/100048] [10/11 Regression] Wrongful CSE'ing of SVE predicates.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100048 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/100121] New: RFE: plugin support for -Wformat via __attribute__((format()))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100121 Bug ID: 100121 Summary: RFE: plugin support for -Wformat via __attribute__((format())) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100048] [10/11 Regression] Wrongful CSE'ing of SVE predicates.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100048 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d15a2a00a384672c5f8228d49eba2b0c09048a43 commit r10-9708-gd15a2a00a384672c5f8228d49eba2b0c09048a43 Author: Tamar Christi

[Bug c++/91706] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #6 from Ja

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100048] [10/11 Regression] Wrongful CSE'ing of SVE predicates.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100048 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8535755af70f819d820553b2e73e72a16a984599 commit r11-8223-g8535755af70f819d820553b2e73e72a16a984599 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug fortran/100120] New: associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 Bug ID: 100120 Summary: associated intrinsic failure Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran A

[Bug fortran/100118] ICE on sizeof with derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100118 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100111] [10/11 Regression] `-fno-elide-constructors` with `constexpr` ctors causes ICE in GCC 10.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100111 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35e8b38a91d9fb49a4759649576f15e76c129d99 commit r11-8222-g35e8b38a91d9fb49a4759649576f15e76c129d99 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/88696] Power VSX builtins missing vmuluwm / vector int vec_mul (vector int, vector int);

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88696 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/57547] Missing vector intrinsics in PowerPC Altivec documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57547 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/100119] New: [x86] Conversion unsigned int -> double produces -0 (-m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100119 Bug ID: 100119 Summary: [x86] Conversion unsigned int -> double produces -0 (-m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse) Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug fortran/100118] New: ICE on sizeof with derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100118 Bug ID: 100118 Summary: ICE on sizeof with derived type components Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug target/100075] [9/10 Regression] unneeded sign extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100075 --- Comment #4 from Luc Van Oostenryck --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Fixed on the trunk. Probably shouldn't be backported. Work great here. Thanks.

[Bug c++/99803] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:4057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99803 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70f2bff43aadd2fcc0595bf9f4bab72647529655 commit r11-8220-g70f2bff43aadd2fcc0595bf9f4bab72647529655 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug libstdc++/100117] FAIL testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/49745.cc with trunk glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- I was looking at the 17_intro/headers/c++1998/49745.cc file contents and can't make sense of the error message in that context. There's no in it.

[Bug libstdc++/100117] FAIL testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/49745.cc with trunk glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- doesn't include AFAIK. is a non-standard header that just includes all standard C++ headers (except for it seems). And it is that now newly (in glibc 2.34) indirectly includes when it didn't before.

[Bug libstdc++/100117] FAIL testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/49745.cc with trunk glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- This looks like the old C++ _GNU_SOURCE issue. But I do not really see why includes . Is this some PCH test? Should really include all the C headers?

  1   2   >