https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99881
Bug ID: 99881
Summary: Regression compare -O2 -ftree-vectorize with -O2 on
SKX/CLX
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880
Bug ID: 99880
Summary: ICE in maybe_set_vectorized_backedge_value, at
tree-vect-loop.c:9161
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210401 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Because I posted 32bit code before, here is what the trunk does with -m32
func34(m34):
fld DWORD PTR [esp+8]
mov eax, DWORD PTR [esp+4]
fstpQWORD PTR [eax]
fld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Works on trunk now but not 10.2. Compiler explorer link:
https://godbolt.org/z/1zbh4YM4W
On the trunk we get the following. I'm guessing that one could enhance the
read pattern by using more registers,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99878
Bug ID: 99878
Summary: -use-ld=gold says "could not find ld" instead of
"could not find gold"
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80824
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80681
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-23 00:00:00 |2021-4-1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 80147, which changed state.
Bug 80147 Summary: missing maybe-uninitialized warning on variable with no side
effects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80147
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80147
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976
Bug 89976 depends on bug 79658, which changed state.
Bug 79658 Summary: [-Wuninitialized] referencing uninitialized field of POD
struct should warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 79658, which changed state.
Bug 79658 Summary: [-Wuninitialized] referencing uninitialized field of POD
struct should warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Reduced more:
template
int sink(Args&&... args) { return 2; }
template
auto fwd(const T1& t1) {
return
[] (auto&&... ts1) {
return
[...ts1 = ts1] () {
return sink(ts1...);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.1.0, 5.3.0, 6.2.0, 7.0|10.2.0, 11.0, 5.5.0, 6.4.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: in |[10 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a60ffc297b9d4903543a25538e62e7fb39420a9
commit r11-7954-g6a60ffc297b9d4903543a25538e62e7fb39420a9
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99877
--- Comment #1 from Carl Nettelblad ---
Created attachment 50500
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50500&action=edit
Preprocessed source file
Fully preprocessed sources. Compressed only to fit bugzilla limit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99874
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh dear, this should have removed the 'noexcept' from the non-const data(),
since it might now fail to allocate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99805
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It would have worked if it used std::as_const(_M_pathname).data() or
_M_pathname.c_str() instead of _M_pathname.data(). It's only the non-const
data() added in C++17 which reallocates (since r261642 anyway)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 78915, which changed state.
Bug 78915 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized accessing allocated memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78915
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78915
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99877
Bug ID: 99877
Summary: Crash in GIMPLE pass:sanopt in huge function using
OpenMP
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99805
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Wow, this is tricksy.
The bug happens when parsing the string into a path. The path is split into
components and the offset of each component from the beginning of the string is
stored, so that parent_path
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-07-20 00:00:00 |2021-4-1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_ops.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_ops.cc
@@ -65,19 +65,12 @@ namespace posix = std::filesystem::__gnu_posix;
fs::path
fs::absolute(const path& p)
{
-#ifdef _GLIBCXX_F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-01
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99875
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99096
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a2dc91d7574d1b03b4e5a8ce4098afb62145c35
commit r10-9653-g3a2dc91d7574d1b03b4e5a8ce4098afb62145c35
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
*** Bug 99583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99583
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf4813202f19768e31666f6aa82bde4dce4065a
commit r11-7953-g0cf4813202f19768e31666f6aa82bde4dce4065a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf4813202f19768e31666f6aa82bde4dce4065a
commit r11-7953-g0cf4813202f19768e31666f6aa82bde4dce4065a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99875
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
Bug ID: 99876
Summary: std::filesystem::absolute is inefficient
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99875
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-darwin, i686-darwin
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99875
Bug ID: 99875
Summary: [10 Regression] experimental filesystem fails on
Darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99869
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99874
Bug ID: 99874
Summary: ICE Segmentation fault when declared variable template
of template lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99869
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99869
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873
Bug ID: 99873
Summary: [11 Regression] GCC no longer makes as much use of ST3
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726
--- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi Paul!
This seems to fix the ICE generated by using -ftrapv -fcheck=bounds
Fixes "nelems" type and adds an optional assert to make sure it stays fixed.
Best regards,
José Rui
diff --git a/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99868
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0, 9.3.0
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I wonder if there's a reason we don't just put the visibility on the namespace
the way we do elsewhere:
namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
I will do that, or just move the pragma after the include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99872
Bug ID: 99872
Summary: [11 Regression] optimizations sometimes lead to
missing asm prefixes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Bug ID: 99871
Summary: #includes inside push visibility scope
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99870
Bug ID: 99870
Summary: uiret generated for -mcmodel=kernel
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99869
Bug ID: 99869
Summary: ICE: in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29620
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99867
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99859
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The instantiation isn't the problem,
template
struct intrusive_ptr
{
T *ptr = nullptr;
constexpr explicit intrusive_ptr(T* p) : ptr(p) {
++ptr->count_;
}
constexpr ~intrusive_ptr() {
if (ptr-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99847
⎓ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98481
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f00df5925082c7b66da91270f2ed29bf4818c93
commit r11-7951-g5f00df5925082c7b66da91270f2ed29bf4818c93
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
Libor Bukata changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libor.bukata at oracle dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99868
Bug ID: 99868
Summary: std::string is not copied correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #22 from Alexander Lelyakin ---
Clean rebuild do not change things:
/home/sasha/GCC/bin/g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header streambuf
/home/sasha/GCC/bin/g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header
type_traits
/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Pants
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97009
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9 Regression] Inlining
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99586
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #15)
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
> >
> > --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
>
> --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Though, we don't add the multiple stores ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, we don't add the multiple stores case to active_local_stores and all
the replace_read calls are from the active_local_stores chain.
So I think the above patch should DTRT.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I think we want to do:
--- gcc/dse.c.jj2021-01-28 09:59:11.973750676 +0100
+++ gcc/dse.c 2021-04-01 15:16:22.003913061 +0200
@@ -1970,8 +1970,7 @@ get_stored_val (store_info *store_info,
stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, I see the actual problem. replace_read checks the hard regs in the insn
sequence and compares them to the live hard regs at the point of the read_insn,
in the testcase insn 134 after the CC setter 6 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #20 from Alexander Lelyakin ---
Just make:
git pull
make
make install
That is: just make in previously configured dir.
Then:
---
g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header string
g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #19 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Yes! that seems to have done it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #18 from Nathan Sidwell ---
* 584731ecedf 2021-04-01 | c++: inter-cluster import order [PR 99283]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:584731ecedf09c2c067913c4af9ed0a30cf19e8d
commit r11-7950-g584731ecedf09c2c067913c4af9ed0a30cf19e8d
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98481
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:892024d4af83b258801ff7484bf28f0cf1a1a999
commit r10-9651-g892024d4af83b258801ff7484bf28f0cf1a1a999
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99867
Bug ID: 99867
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in to_constant, at poly-int.h:504
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Richard, did you mean to CC me for another PR by any chance?
Never mind, I was confused by your commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99858
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As requested by https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ please provide code, not just a URL.
Reduced:
extern "C" int printf(const char*, ...);
int main() try {
try {
throw (void*)1;
} catch (void*& ptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:512429a885e87bef51057a001681b7d8d106e807
commit r11-7949-g512429a885e87bef51057a001681b7d8d106e807
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #6 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99647
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99859
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Started with r10-7268-g529ea7d9596b26ba.
Reverting on trunk fixes the issue. Good vs. bad assembly shows the likely
culprit:
shrq$32, %rax
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3064fc21aa29d8e04b23c0b52dc4f67de1da6b2f
commit r11-7948-g3064fc21aa29d8e04b23c0b52dc4f67de1da6b2f
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu Ap
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
