[Bug tree-optimization/99656] New: ICE in linear_loads_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99656 Bug ID: 99656 Summary: ICE in linear_loads_p Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c++/99589] lambda init-capture without initializer in C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99589 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- reduced: auto f(auto x) { [...x]{}; }

[Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument not associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602 --- Comment #25 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 50430 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50430&action=edit reproducer for another model pointer, final for 2021-03-19-03:22

[Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument not associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602 --- Comment #24 from Jürgen Reuter --- Please have a look at my final reproducer. Is that feasible?

[Bug analyzer/99614] diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from David Malco

[Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument not associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602 --- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 50429 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50429&action=edit first ok-ish reproducer

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 99500, which changed state. Bug 99500 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828 https:

[Bug c++/99500] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99500 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99500] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99500 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd9b262fa9243e08fefa4973f08d1f09f6694ba0 commit r11-7727-gbd9b262fa9243e08fefa4973f08d1f09f6694ba0 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument not associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602 --- Comment #22 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 50428 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50428&action=edit bit smaller reproducer, not yet ideal

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 --- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Good point. How about 'conformance' for a keyword?

[Bug c++/99655] [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99655 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99655] [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99655 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/99655] New: [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99655 Bug ID: 99655 Summary: [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument not associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602 --- Comment #21 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 50427 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50427&action=edit remaing false positive detection (long test)

[Bug debug/99654] New: Incorrect DW_AT_entry_pc values for inlined function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99654 Bug ID: 99654 Summary: Incorrect DW_AT_entry_pc values for inlined function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/99609] Pure Function that has a Variable with Value Attribute that is modified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- inline long double foo (void) { return 1.0; } gcc -S -O2 -mno-80387 double.c double.c: In function ‘foo’: double.c:3:1: error: x87 register return with x87 disabled 3 | { | ^

[Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument not associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602 --- Comment #20 from Jürgen Reuter --- Looks like there is still one more case. One of our unit tests is still failing with this patch. I will report more soon.

[Bug c++/99650] ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 --- Comment #4 from Csaba Ráduly --- Is this a dup of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79372 ? https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org/msg522821.html

[Bug c++/99642] Compiler error while using precompiled header and -Wmismatched-tags flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99642 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Type and spec are the messages facet, but the same problem happens with other types. A simpler test case is: $ (set -x && cat pch.h && cat main.cpp) + cat pch.h #include + cat main.cpp #include #include "p

[Bug fortran/99651] Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99651 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- The obvious idea to do: if (sym->attr.flavor == FL_UNKNOWN || sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE) in gfc_intrinsic_func_interface works, but has the side effect that for print *, allocated(f) ('f' is a

[Bug fortran/99651] Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99651 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-18 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/99651] Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99651 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug target/99422] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn building glibc pthread_create

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422 --- Comment #31 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4670f58ebff805e35268542aac35f9791980954 commit r11-7725-ga4670f58ebff805e35268542aac35f9791980954 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug tree-optimization/99502] missing -Warray-bounds on partial out of bounds access in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99502 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/99502] missing -Warray-bounds on partial out of bounds access in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99502 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30b10dacd0a8c926c22eab7d4aeb52ff86534acf commit r11-7724-g30b10dacd0a8c926c22eab7d4aeb52ff86534acf Author: Martin Sebor Date: Thu

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug c++/99650] ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-18 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/99653] [AIX] Bitfield placement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99653 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99653] New: [AIX] Bitfield placement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99653 Bug ID: 99653 Summary: [AIX] Bitfield placement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99652] New: inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 Bug ID: 99652 Summary: inline doesn't with -mno-sse Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assi

[Bug c++/99650] ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-18 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/99650] ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/97926] ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926 --- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- So the underlying problem here is that the unordered comparisons are not allowed with -ffinite-math-only due to this predicate: ;; Return 1 if OP is a comparison operation that is valid for a br

[Bug fortran/57141] Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141 --- Comment #7 from Antonio --- Ok, I have created the following bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99651

[Bug fortran/99651] New: Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99651 Bug ID: 99651 Summary: Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug testsuite/97680] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680 --- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon --- For arm yes, but according to gcc-testresults, it's failing on ia64 and s390 too, at least.

[Bug c++/99650] New: ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 Bug ID: 99650 Summary: ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99314] [Patch] [RISC-V] g++.dg/opt/memcpy1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/99648] [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/99314] [Patch] [RISC-V] g++.dg/opt/memcpy1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:becb26eb6ef42481014dc6fb24e8bfe7ec6f51d1 commit r9-9294-gbecb26eb6ef42481014dc6fb24e8bfe7ec6f51d1 Author: Sinan Lin Date: Th

[Bug target/99314] [Patch] [RISC-V] g++.dg/opt/memcpy1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f26015ef086f68d55f1f2ae293a99d5ad3736795 commit r10-9456-gf26015ef086f68d55f1f2ae293a99d5ad3736795 Author: Sinan Lin Date:

[Bug c/99649] GDB has issue to show backtrace if the breakpoint is in a function with more then 8 parameters - only for target aarch64-elf ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99649 --- Comment #2 from Filip Bascarevic --- Hello Andre, thank you so much for your quick reply. I also noticed that but somehow with GCC 8.1 and GDB 8.1 this example works, no GDB endless loop with showing us backtrace.

[Bug testsuite/97680] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug target/99314] [Patch] [RISC-V] g++.dg/opt/memcpy1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9f0ade001533c9544bf2153b6baa8844ec0bee4 commit r11-7720-gd9f0ade001533c9544bf2153b6baa8844ec0bee4 Author: Sinan Lin Date: Thu Mar 4

[Bug c/99649] GDB has issue to show backtrace if the breakpoint is in a function with more then 8 parameters - only for target aarch64-elf ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99649 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Gdb support for ilp32 has never been committed so I dont see how you are using it.

[Bug c/99649] New: GDB has issue to show backtrace if the breakpoint is in a function with more then 8 parameters only in target aarch64-elf ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99649 Bug ID: 99649 Summary: GDB has issue to show backtrace if the breakpoint is in a function with more then 8 parameters only in target aarch64-elf ILP32 Product: gcc

[Bug target/91710] [9/10/11 Regression] unexpected ABI change note since r9-5650

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91710 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50421 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50421&action=edit gcc11-pr91710.patch So perhaps pass the old alignment to the caller and let that function verify if it is reall

[Bug other/99648] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 Bug ID: 99648 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/99626] [10 Regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 regression] |[10 Regression] |gcc.d

[Bug testsuite/99636] [10 Regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-80.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99636 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 regression] |[10 Regression] |gcc.d

[Bug testsuite/99636] [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-80.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99636 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89d44a9f3b9ab97634b7ef894e2c83ebd83582a8 commit r11-7719-g89d44a9f3b9ab97634b7ef894e2c83ebd83582a8 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug tree-optimization/99646] s111 benchmark of TSVC preffers -mprefer-avx128 on zen3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99646 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/99296] [11 Regression] ICE:in irange_set_anti_range, at value-range.cc:205 with "-Os -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp" since r11-5105-ga5f9c27bfc441722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99296 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 50420 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50420&action=edit proposed patch As Jakub has mentioned, this is a problem with signed 1-bit precision. Legacy anti-ranges has

[Bug target/99647] arm: GCC generates invalid MVE vmov instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99647 --- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan --- Also fails for GCC 10. Not sure if this counts as a regression since MVE only went in with GCC 10.

[Bug testsuite/99626] [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99626 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fff9faa79043aa53d361e7f6e31b2680007a97e2 commit r11-7718-gfff9faa79043aa53d361e7f6e31b2680007a97e2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug target/99647] New: arm: GCC generates invalid MVE vmov instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99647 Bug ID: 99647 Summary: arm: GCC generates invalid MVE vmov instruction Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta

[Bug debug/99230] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/pr83527.c excess errors: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99230 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 50414 [details] > gcc11-pr99230.patch > > Untested fix. Tested at r11-7589 for cris-elf, fixes the fail with no regressions. Thanks!

[Bug middle-end/99646] New: s111 benchmark of TSVC preffers -mprefer-avx128 on zen3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99646 Bug ID: 99646 Summary: s111 benchmark of TSVC preffers -mprefer-avx128 on zen3 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes. Or maybe instead check that objdump -j .debug_loclists -h (or .debug_rnglists) has both VMA and LMA all zeros instead? Dunno what exactly that command prints in broken and what on correct binaries on W

[Bug debug/99606] [10/11 Regression] ld.bfd: DWARF error: could not find abbrev number 64 since r10-7521-g54af95767e887d63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99606 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/99642] Compiler error while using precompiled header and -Wmismatched-tags flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99642 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0 --- Comment #2 from Martin S

[Bug testsuite/97680] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0211fbb610c19d728c68a0c6c603826059ea9af9 commit r11-7716-g0211fbb610c19d728c68a0c6c603826059ea9af9 Author: Christophe Lyon Date:

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #43 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is it as simple as running the following? ${target}-objdump -j .debug_loclists -h a.exe | grep -q 0001 A return code 0 means potentially broken linker script is used.

[Bug c++/99642] Compiler error while using precompiled header and -Wmismatched-tags flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99642 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug target/99645] New: pdp-11 target produces inefficient code for sign extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99645 Bug ID: 99645 Summary: pdp-11 target produces inefficient code for sign extend Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/84437] long long casting breaks PDP-11 with -m10 model option (includes trivial reproducer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84437 pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/59942] pdp11-aout-gcc: PDP-11/10 code generation crashes when trying to do multiple shifts.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59942 pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNC

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/99643] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error in build_over_call, involving array new and copy elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99644] New: Add fix-it hint for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99644 Bug ID: 99644 Summary: Add fix-it hint for Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/99588] variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/99643] New: internal compiler error in build_over_call, involving array new and copy elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643 Bug ID: 99643 Summary: internal compiler error in build_over_call, involving array new and copy elision Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/99593] [11 Regression] arm Neon ICE when compiling firefox (skia) since r11-6708

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593 --- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon --- I can confirm that the new test (as described in comment #12) works: - alone it results in ICE in the relevant configurations (skipped otherwise) - with the patch, it passes in the relevant configurations

[Bug c++/99642] New: Compiler error while using precompiled header and -Wmismatched-tags flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99642 Bug ID: 99642 Summary: Compiler error while using precompiled header and -Wmismatched-tags flag Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug objc++/49070] [8/9/10/11 regression] ObjC++ compiler fails to compile ObjC method invocations without keyword arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49070 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cc218d42c241ed286cc5af9fb7d2e45386f7a24 commit r11-7714-g0cc218d42c241ed286cc5af9fb7d2e45386f7a24 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Fri

[Bug c/99588] variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/99363] [10,11 regression] gcc.dg/attr-flatten-1.c fails starting with r11-7469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a98cb0f1065de3227a91b6597d62d157f8640323 commit r10-9454-ga98cb0f1065de3227a91b6597d62d157f8640323 Author: Jason Merrill D

[Bug c++/95451] [8/9/10 regression] ICE for lambda capturing this and calling operator() since r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfbd0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fiesh at zefix dot tv --- Comment #10 fr

[Bug c++/99640] Internal compiler error: in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99637] bit_cast doesn't work with padding bits and it should

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99637 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes. If the result type is a class type and the padding bits in the input correspond to unsigned char or std::byte subobjects in the result, that's OK (because the only parts with indeterminate values are b

[Bug middle-end/99641] [11 Regression] opt30.adb, opt49.adb and loop_optimization3.adb fail to build at m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99641 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ada |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/99641] [11 Regression] opt30.adb, opt49.adb and loop_optimization3.adb fail to build at m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99641 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- I can reproduce, it's the expansion of __builtin_memcmp.

[Bug sanitizer/99179] asan failures with -Os on x86_64-apple-darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99179 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin20 |x86_64-apple-darwin Build|x86

[Bug target/99639] Duplicated constant in V2SI/V4SI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99639 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually typedef int V __attribute__((vector_size (16))); typedef int W __attribute__((vector_size (32))); V f1 (void) { return (V) { 1, 2, 3, 4 }; } W f2 (void) { return (W) { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }; } W

[Bug gcov-profile/96092] Should --coverage respect -ffile-prefix-map?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/99616] gcc/cp/decl.c:12220: pointless test ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99616 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues in gcc that other static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer, PVS-studio) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 99617, which changed state. Bug 99617 Summary: gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2807: member variables not initialised in constructor ? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99617 What|Removed

[Bug c++/99617] gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2807: member variables not initialised in constructor ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99617 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99617] gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2807: member variables not initialised in constructor ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99617 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bcf19215d88e6ec33d283352c52005f02dbc784 commit r11-7712-g3bcf19215d88e6ec33d283352c52005f02dbc784 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue

[Bug ada/99641] [11 Regression] opt30.adb, opt49.adb and loop_optimization3.adb fail to build at m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99641 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-18 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ada/99641] New: [11 Regression] opt30.adb, opt49.adb and loop_optimization3.adb fail to build at m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99641 Bug ID: 99641 Summary: [11 Regression] opt30.adb, opt49.adb and loop_optimization3.adb fail to build at m32 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/99639] Duplicated constant in V2SI/V4SI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/99637] bit_cast doesn't work with padding bits and it should

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99637 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > > So the result cannot be created. > > Not during constant evaluation, anyway. And outside of constant evaluat

[Bug target/99639] Duplicated constant in V2SI/V4SI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99639 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I think you need to be lucky to have V4SI "registered" first. At least I remember we have code to deal with this situation in the constant pool handling.

  1   2   >