https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Obviously, it would be great if that regression doesn't make it into the 11.1
official release. [As it is with debug flags, that would be less dramatic than
with default flags]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
Bug ID: 99545
Summary: [11.0 regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99544
Bug ID: 99544
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in expand_mult, at expmed.c:3582
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
It is definitely a problem in the dg infrastructure that compile mode doesn't
work with additional sources, but fixing that seems quite involved, more than I
can tackle right now. I've tried to duplicate t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99543
Bug ID: 99543
Summary: ICE module compilation ../../gcc/toplev.c:327
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99542
Bug ID: 99542
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at
poly-int.h:2219
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99541
Bug ID: 99541
Summary: ICE when reading a module
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172
--- Comment #11 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 50360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50360&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix issue
This patch fixes the issue, without breaking VTV, and is currently out f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540
Bug ID: 99540
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99539
Bug ID: 99539
Summary: Varargs are allowed in requires expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99538
Bug ID: 99538
Summary: ICE when lambda return requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99537
Bug ID: 99537
Summary: Wrong memory_order used in stop_token ref-counting
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:59:39PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
>
> --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99536
Bug ID: 99536
Summary: unexplained warning on "uninitialized value"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99535
--- Comment #1 from Darrell Wright ---
I was wrong, http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#5.8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99535
Bug ID: 99535
Summary: g++ rejects valid code in constexpr copy ctor and
volatile submember
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99534
Bug ID: 99534
Summary: bogus UDL diagnostic for header-name followed by macro
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99279
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed in gcc10 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
The only problem now is due to privilege issues, we cannot dynamic linking with
libstdc++-6.so
I think they can just use fast_io instead and that will avoid the bloating
here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #8 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 50359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50359&action=edit
Hello world runs successfully
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #7 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 50358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50358&action=edit
The patch works. No issue.
Jonathan, you can merge my patch to master now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99492
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fa6356be14414957be05bdf5e22037fe1bea283
commit r11-7615-g4fa6356be14414957be05bdf5e22037fe1bea283
Author: David Edelsohn
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:410ddbbc6612ca25f4a00120987921372937623e
commit r10-9433-g410ddbbc6612ca25f4a00120987921372937623e
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99279
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a35ff4ecdd22745bda9afd8fe095fb469acd624
commit r10-9432-g0a35ff4ecdd22745bda9afd8fe095fb469acd624
Author: Peter Bergner
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:336cd08b65ea589bc4acc8c91a4a4c4873363989
commit r10-9430-g336cd08b65ea589bc4acc8c91a4a4c4873363989
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Oh, sorry. I guess it's not obvious. I need the preprocessed source from all
of the xtreme-header-3 series. Test of the form ${BASENAME}_[a-z].[CHX] are a
group compiled in ascending letter order. Scrape
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490
--- Comment #14 from Jan Kratochvil ---
DW_AT_addr_base is for .debug_addr in the main file, I agree, my mistake. That
should be inherited from the skeleton to the split-unit.
But DW_AT_loclists_base, DW_AT_rnglists_base and DW_AT_str_offsets_ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99533
Bug ID: 99533
Summary: "operation not permitted" error on
recursive_directory_iterator despite
skip_permission_denied
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:22:45PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99532
Bug ID: 99532
Summary: missing warning on placement new into smaller space
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99531
Bug ID: 99531
Summary: Performance regression since gcc 9 (argument passing /
register allocation)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> I don't know fortran enough for what 'parameter' means in this context:
>
>real(double), parameter:: latt(jmax) = [(latt100(i)/100.d0, j=1,jmax)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That sentence says that they should not be in the DW_TAG_compile_unit in
.debug_info.dwo, but may be instead (if present at all) in DW_TAG_skeleton_unit
in .debug_info. Haven't checked all, but DW_AT_addr_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490
--- Comment #12 from Jan Kratochvil ---
That looks as a DWARF5 bug to me. DW_AT_str_offsets_base, DW_AT_addr_base and
DW_AT_rnglists_base do not make any sense for a split unit. Split unit contains
only one CompileUnit (and optionally one TypeUni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
DWARF5 3.1.3 says:
The following attributes are not part of a split full compilation unit entry
but instead are inherited (if present) from the corresponding skeleton
compilation unit: DW_AT_low_pc, DW_AT_hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira ---
Matching Clang/LLVM bug report:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99018
--- Comment #2 from David Stone ---
Simpler test case
```
struct s {
constexpr ~s() {
}
};
constexpr bool f(s const (&)[1]) {
return true;
}
static_assert(f({s()}));
```
Message
```
:10:16: error: non-constant conditi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99205
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c21bc6646dbe3365d7f89843a79eee823aa3b52
commit r11-7614-g8c21bc6646dbe3365d7f89843a79eee823aa3b52
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
Bug ID: 99530
Summary: [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should
obey -fno-plt
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 50357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50357&action=edit
Bionic ctype patch for libstdc++
It looks macros are defined differently on different versions of bionic. The
latest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99352
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just running the compilation doesn't work as it requires some stuff that must
be generated earlier.
In module imported at
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #14)
> We should definitely not be allowing the AltiVec "& ~16" flavors into these
> patterns. I'm not certain whether your fix is the best way to achieve that,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99529
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Regarding calling newunit_alloc, that's due to libgfortran/io/unit.c's:
get_unit (st_parameter_dt *dtp, int do_create)
{
gfc_unit *unit;
if ((dtp->common.flags & IOPARM_DT_HAS_INTERNAL_UNIT) != 0)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99525
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
The (otherwise untested) change below corrects the location:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.c b/gcc/tree-inline.c
index 1dcb31c0267..c77745b788d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-inline.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-inline.c
@@ -4938,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
-save-temps to the compile line scraped from .log should dtrt. but yeah,
requires a bit more fidelity than before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #22 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Could you check the patch on the failed bootstraps. I have no access to
solaris machines.
Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d38bbb85117a9947797f10d459fe0c23ea479313
commit r11-7613-gd38bbb85117a9947797f10d459fe0c23ea479313
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
// bug.h
template
class new_allocator
{
public:
template
new_allocator(const new_allocator<_Tp1>&) noexcept { }
};
extern template class new_allocator;
// bug_a.H
#include "bug.h"
// bug_b.H
#include "b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99529
Bug ID: 99529
Summary: libgfortran I/O: Data races related to new unit / new
unit calls for I/O to strings
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #5 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 50356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50356&action=edit
ctype.h
ctype.h actually provides those macros. but they said
"Internal implementation detail. Do not use."
I try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
Hi, jonathan. I found something different from old versions of android compared
to GCC source.
https://android.googlesource.com/toolchain/gcc/+/refs/heads/ndk-r11-release/gcc-4.9/libstdc++-v3/config/os/bionic/cty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Bug ID: 99528
Summary: [modules] ICE with iostream& vector
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I only saw the xtreme 3 ICE on a power 9 and the xtreme 4 ICEs on a power 7.
Ugh. Generating a .i is not straightforward for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99423, which changed state.
Bug 99423 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check: expected tree_vec, have ggc_freed
in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f428775acc391c8ce4fcf79b243043fcc99
commit r11-7610-g1f428775acc391c8ce4fcf79b243043fcc99
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Honza, could you please have a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99527
Bug ID: 99527
Summary: ICE when using nested lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk. Needs backporting to GCC10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99526
Bug ID: 99526
Summary: Casts should retain typedef information
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99525
Bug ID: 99525
Summary: wrong location of implicitly generated assignment to
polymorphic class
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I started to work on another, more safe approach to solve the problems. I hope
the patch will be ready today or tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99524
Bug ID: 99524
Summary: initializer_list storage considered a temporary when
accessed through NTTP
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/aWGr3P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99492
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW the version in the initial comment is what appears in 525.x264_r in
SPEC2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
// bug_a.ii
template
struct pair
{
pair() { }
};
inline pair blob ()
{
return {};
}
// bug_b.ii
import "bug_a.ii";
pair boom();
./cc1plus -fmodule-header=system -std=c++20 bug_a.ii -fpreprocessed -q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from 康桓瑋
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99361
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99523
Bug ID: 99523
Summary: Declarations for variable names missing in GIMPLE dump
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I am not seeing this on the compile farm's 2 ppc systems I use (gcc1-power7 and
gcc2-power8). Can you extract preprocessed source for that set of header
tests?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44fd4dc0b684e06c6c6d08b3994df23135bf2fbc
commit r11-7609-g44fd4dc0b684e06c6c6d08b3994df23135bf2fbc
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:39:19AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506
>
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> This is a frontend issue, the FE p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99498
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bf998275aff311b9804c1de944a88c219f35db6
commit r11-7607-g5bf998275aff311b9804c1de944a88c219f35db6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bf998275aff311b9804c1de944a88c219f35db6
commit r11-7607-g5bf998275aff311b9804c1de944a88c219f35db6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not sure it is worth bothering except making sure we don't miscompile valid
weird code.
BTW, for testing, one can also mix the |s and +s in the expressions randomly to
get the result.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Obviously _U worked at some point when that file was added. CCing Maxim to
> figure out what changed and whether we want to support the old ctype
> constants as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Consider e.g.
> unsigned foo (unsigned x)
> {
> return (x<<24) + ((x<<8)&0xff) + ((x>>8)&0xff00) + (x>>24) +
> (((x&0xff00)<<16)>>8);
> }
> as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Consider e.g.
unsigned foo (unsigned x)
{
return (x<<24) + ((x<<8)&0xff) + ((x>>8)&0xff00) + (x>>24) +
(((x&0xff00)<<16)>>8);
}
as example that should not be optimized into __builtin_bswap32 (but should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bet handling PLUS_EXPR next to BIT_IOR_EXPR in find_bswap_or_nop_1
and pass_optimize_bswap::execute could do the trick.
Though, I guess for PLUS_EXPR one needs stronger tests in
perform_symbolic_merge.
Becaus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99522
Bug ID: 99522
Summary: Using the unseq execution policy in min_element
requires the sequence value type to be copy assignable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99465
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 ---
*** Bug 99521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99521
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ---
> a-ztflau.adb: In function 'Ada.Float_Wide_Wide_Text_Io.Aux_Float.Puts':
> a-ztflau.adb:132:8: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
> (insn 174 39 180 2 (set (mem/c:DF (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 30 %fp)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99511
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99521
Bug ID: 99521
Summary: ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in
requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99508
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
Bug ID: 99520
Summary: Failure to detect bswap pattern
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99508
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b97af562b574697a4fff7fb8c69f579c01e70dec
commit r11-7605-gb97af562b574697a4fff7fb8c69f579c01e70dec
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99518
nickgray0 at brown dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99518
--- Comment #1 from nickgray0 at brown dot edu ---
I just looked up the standard and it seems GCC is correct to reject the code
and Clang's implementation (which happily compiles the code) is incorrect. the
compound requirement requires the parent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93628
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03b6ceede733d7ae33eca695c06b181b
commit r11-7603-g03b6ceede733d7ae33eca695c06b181b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99413
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47cca0288d06bd851e5801d13bbee7d9374b685d
commit r11-7604-g47cca0288d06bd851e5801d13bbee7d9374b685d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
