[Bug fortran/99350] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/99349] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/82721] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Error message with corrupted text, sometimes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82721 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/79524] [8/9/10/11 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug d/99337] Sanitizer detect heap-buffer-overflow in checkModFileAlias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #3) > Fix is trivial > > --- a/gcc/d/dmd/dmodule.c > +++ b/gcc/d/dmd/dmodule.c > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void checkModFileAlias(OutBuffer *buf, OutBuffer > *dotmods,

[Bug fortran/52622] heap-use-after-free with instrumented compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug libfortran/81986] sanitizer detects negation of large number in string.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81986 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:006693a59f7cd1310aed53a2816020bedf1fb742 commit r11-7470-g006693a59f7cd1310aed53a2816020bedf1fb742 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: We

[Bug fortran/99355] -freal-X-real-Y -freal-Z-real-X promotes Z to Y

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355 --- Comment #1 from Nick --- Oh, sorry about gcc-version. I checked this for all these gcc, same for all: 4.8.5 4.9.4 5.4.0 6.5.0 7.5.0 8.4.0 9.2.0

[Bug fortran/99355] New: -freal-X-real-Y -freal-Z-real-X promotes Z to Y

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355 Bug ID: 99355 Summary: -freal-X-real-Y -freal-Z-real-X promotes Z to Y Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/94092] Code size and performance degradations after -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns was enabled at -O[2s]+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092 --- Comment #11 from Mel Chen --- (In reply to Mel Chen from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > > (In reply to Mel Chen from comment #8) > > > Sorry for using the bad example to describe the problem I am facing. Let >

[Bug c++/99354] spurious Wuninitialized warning diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99354] New: spurious Wuninitialized warning diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99354 Bug ID: 99354 Summary: spurious Wuninitialized warning diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/95675] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_over_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96078] [10 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Known to fail|11.0

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8e7f3f3f33e22721a28772cc3f9b616e48cd1c9 commit r11-7469-gf8e7f3f3f33e22721a28772cc3f9b616e48cd1c9 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug fortran/99351] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:695

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99351 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-03 Ever confirmed|

[Bug fortran/99349] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug c++/99353] New: warn_unused attribute does not seem to work for static variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99353 Bug ID: 99353 Summary: warn_unused attribute does not seem to work for static variables Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/91191] vrp and boolean arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yea, I think so -- which would be undefined because the sizes are different according to the docs you referenced. Which would also invalidate part of my responses in c#5 and c#7. It sounds like something o

[Bug bootstrap/98590] [11 regression] Bootstrap failure with Ada on Cygwin since switch to C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98590 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b6ebc025cf2b25fdc1e8f6e6261701dc71bac74 commit r11-7464-g8b6ebc025cf2b25fdc1e8f6e6261701dc71bac74 Author: Mikael Pettersson Date: Tu

[Bug c++/99331] [8/9/10/11 Regression] -Wconversion false-positive in immediate context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- This is caused by this change: @@ -7278,7 +7306,7 @@ convert_template_argument (tree parm, val = error_mark_node; } } - else if (!dependent_template_arg_p (orig_arg) + else if

[Bug libbacktrace/98818] [libbacktrace] Don't throw fatal error for unsupported dwarf version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98818 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com Statu

[Bug analyzer/95043] GCC 10 Analyzer and false positive on 'memcpy(dest, src, count);'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95043 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug libbacktrace/98818] [libbacktrace] Don't throw fatal error for unsupported dwarf version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98818 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df003d1e0bf2d0a8e2ed45a323d4e974b15dc95f commit r11-7462-gdf003d1e0bf2d0a8e2ed45a323d4e974b15dc95f Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date

[Bug c/99323] [9/10 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234 since r8-379-gd1b5f5cc3cfd148e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/99323] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234 since r8-379-gd1b5f5cc3cfd148e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41fbacdd10305654b1d10f887fa3f4677f9b8f34 commit r11-7461-g41fbacdd10305654b1d10f887fa3f4677f9b8f34 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug middle-end/99276] grammar in diagnostics for overflowing the destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99276 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 99276, which changed state. Bug 99276 Summary: grammar in diagnostics for overflowing the destination https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99276 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/99276] grammar in diagnostics for overflowing the destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99276 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7ca37649e4f322e7512c6d11813992c61b0a4b3 commit r11-7460-ge7ca37649e4f322e7512c6d11813992c61b0a4b3 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug middle-end/93235] [AArch64] ICE with __fp16 in a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/99352] check_effective_target_sqrt_insn for powerpc is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99352 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target|

[Bug testsuite/99352] New: check_effective_target_sqrt_insn for powerpc is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99352 Bug ID: 99352 Summary: check_effective_target_sqrt_insn for powerpc is wrong Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c/99347] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- And before that it was fixed in r7-6819-gd4cbfca47f47194a.

[Bug c/99347] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-02 Summary|[9/10/11 Re

[Bug rtl-optimization/99346] [aarch64] ICE in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1021

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99346 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > This is a dup of bug 93235. I should note I reduced it to that bug report and looking at the expand/optimized dumps to see it was also.

[Bug middle-end/93235] [AArch64] ICE with __fp16 in a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/99346] [aarch64] ICE in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1021

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/99351] New: ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:695

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99351 Bug ID: 99351 Summary: ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:695 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/99350] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350 Bug ID: 99350 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/99349] New: ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349 Bug ID: 99349 Summary: ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/99345] [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from G.

[Bug fortran/99348] New: ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 Bug ID: 99348 Summary: ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c/99347] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug c/99347] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 Bug ID: 99347 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug web/98875] DWARF5 as default causes perf probe to hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98875 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/99346] [aarch64] ICE in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1021

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from An

[Bug c/99295] [9/10 Regression] documentation on __attribute__((malloc)) is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|11.0| Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug c/99295] [9/10/11 Regression] documentation on __attribute__((malloc)) is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:397ed1dbffe6c4a48548b601b35699e571e200a3 commit r11-7459-g397ed1dbffe6c4a48548b601b35699e571e200a3 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug middle-end/95507] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wnonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95507 Bug 95507 depends on bug 99251, which changed state. Bug 99251 Summary: [11 Regression] inconsistent -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99251 What|Removed

[Bug c++/99251] [11 Regression] inconsistent -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99251 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99251] [11 Regression] inconsistent -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99251 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66ecb059c9d77cfcfb06cbdc3cac6a63b9e67f3d commit r11-7458-g66ecb059c9d77cfcfb06cbdc3cac6a63b9e67f3d Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug d/99337] Sanitizer detect heap-buffer-overflow in checkModFileAlias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- Fix is trivial --- a/gcc/d/dmd/dmodule.c +++ b/gcc/d/dmd/dmodule.c @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void checkModFileAlias(OutBuffer *buf, OutBuffer *dotmods, const char *m = (*ms)[j]; const char *

[Bug debug/99319] DW_MACRO_define_strp uses uleb128 for second operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99319 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/99325] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_print_line_1, at c-family/c-ppoutput.c:454 since r11-5091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99325 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug debug/99319] DW_MACRO_define_strp uses uleb128 for second operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99319 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a233ae4d8c978a3c863c8199d6c3050389a84d1 commit r11-7457-g5a233ae4d8c978a3c863c8199d6c3050389a84d1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug rtl-optimization/99346] New: [aarch64] ICE in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1021

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99346 Bug ID: 99346 Summary: [aarch64] ICE in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1021 Product: gcc Version: 8.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/99345] New: [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 Bug ID: 99345 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UN

[Bug target/99321] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*uminv16qi3} since r11-7121-g37876976b0511ec9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99321 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50288 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50288&action=edit gcc11-pr99321.patch Untested fix for the peephole2. The rest will be done separately.

[Bug ada/99095] [10/11 regression] issue with function returning unconstrained array of limited record

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99095 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/99095] [10/11 regression] issue with function returning unconstrained array of limited record

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99095 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7297af89ea22c1a1da8609d811e100cf73e574d6 commit r10-9402-g7297af89ea22c1a1da8609d811e100cf73e574d6 Author: Eric Botcazou D

[Bug ada/99095] [10/11 regression] issue with function returning unconstrained array of limited record

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99095 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:168b75ff54b4e70650b8709816edff13f93e737a commit r11-7456-g168b75ff54b4e70650b8709816edff13f93e737a Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tu

[Bug libstdc++/95079] unorderd_map::insert_or_assign and try_emplace should only hash and mod once unless there is a rehash.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95079 --- Comment #6 from François Dumont --- Thanks for the feedback. If this is still a problem for you after this enhancement you should perhaps try the _Power2_rehash_policy provided as an extension. In testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/insert

[Bug c/99317] Missed warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99317 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug other/93090] RFE: Add a frontend for the Rust programming language

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- It seems that the gccrs frontend is now sponsored by two companies, so I think it's fine to stop the Bountysource campaign [1] and move the money to other Bountysource campaigns. > [1] https://ru

[Bug c++/99344] [modules] import failure with intermediate namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99344 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99344] New: [modules] import failure with intermediate namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99344 Bug ID: 99344 Summary: [modules] import failure with intermediate namespace Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 --- Comment #6 from Mathias Stearn --- > The question is how common in the wild it is and if it is worth the work. I'm not sure how common it is, but this is my use case. The code in the bug report is a slightly simplified example from some Real

[Bug inline-asm/99342] Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342 Stewart Hildebrand changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50286|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug preprocessor/99343] New: Suggest: -H option support output to file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99343 Bug ID: 99343 Summary: Suggest: -H option support output to file Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preproc

[Bug bootstrap/98338] [10/11 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62125ef043e19c58780bc06d0e2f2221bbbf28f6 commit r10-9401-g62125ef043e19c58780bc06d0e2f2221bbbf28f6 Author: Jan Hubicka Date

[Bug c/99323] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234 since r8-379-gd1b5f5cc3cfd148e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug inline-asm/99342] Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342 Stewart Hildebrand changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug d/99337] Sanitizer detect heap-buffer-overflow in checkModFileAlias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|63426 |86656 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška -

[Bug d/99337] Sanitizer detect heap-buffer-overflow in checkModFileAlias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337 --- Comment #1 from Vittorio Zecca --- This issue was found with the address sanitizer, while issues in bug 63426 were found with the undefined behavior sanitizer.

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- GCC 9 warns as well. I think this was a false negative which is now fixed. Note GCC 10.1.0 and GCC 10.2.0 warn for me as well, so something must have regressed this between 10.2.0 and g:eddcb627ccfbd97e025

[Bug inline-asm/99342] Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342 --- Comment #2 from Stewart Hildebrand --- Created attachment 50286 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50286&action=edit Preprocessed file I compressed the sched.ii file since it exceeded 1000KB. I've attached sched.ii.tar.gz a

[Bug inline-asm/99342] Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/95079] unorderd_map::insert_or_assign and try_emplace should only hash and mod once unless there is a rehash.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95079 --- Comment #5 from Mathias Stearn --- @François Dumont: Sorry I didn't see your question earlier. The reason that unordered_map perf hurts on 64-bit platforms is because it is designed to do a size_t modulus-by-prime on every lookup, and on most

[Bug inline-asm/99342] New: Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342 Bug ID: 99342 Summary: Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/82959] g++ doesn't appreciate C++17 evaluation order rules for overloaded operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 --- Comment #5 from Mathias Stearn --- I filed a related bug with clang right after this one if anyone want to follow along https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49395. Just because clang does worse doesn't mean gcc shouldn't do better ;)

[Bug fortran/99307] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > Reduced test > > While -fsanitize=address,undefined does not find anything on > x86_64-gnu-linux, I do see w

[Bug libstdc++/99341] [11 Regression] new std::call_once is not backwards compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99341 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The new implementation added these new symbols to libstdc++.so: _ZNSt9once_flag11_M_activateEv _ZNSt9once_flag9_M_finishEb I think I'd like to keep them, but have the new implementation disabled by defaul

[Bug libstdc++/99333] std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99333 --- Comment #4 from Moritz Bunkus --- Oh right, sorry — I misread your earlier comment.

[Bug libstdc++/99341] [11 Regression] new std::call_once is not backwards compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99341 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/99341] New: [11 Regression] new std::call_once is not backwards compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99341 Bug ID: 99341 Summary: [11 Regression] new std::call_once is not backwards compatible Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI Sev

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/99333] std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99333 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Moritz Bunkus from comment #2) > while Boost recognizes both. That's what I wanted to know, thanks. > Note that __CYGWIN__ is not defined with the compiler from MXE! Obviously, because it's

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So we could try to lower even va_start/end to expose the va_list meta fully to the middle-end early which should eventually allow eliding it. That would require introducing other builtins/internal fns to al

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3) > Created attachment 50284 [details] > preprocessed source > > original test case before reducing > > gcc -std=gnu99 -Werror=uninitialized -Werror=maybe-uninitial

[Bug c++/96443] Incorrect satisfaction value for dependent placeholder return type constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96443 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e52f8ec25c0e58ebd083e8370e2fbc8af4120d87 commit r11-7454-ge52f8ec25c0e58ebd083e8370e2fbc8af4120d87 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c++/96960] [C++20] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:20531 from lambda in return-type-requirement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96960 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e52f8ec25c0e58ebd083e8370e2fbc8af4120d87 commit r11-7454-ge52f8ec25c0e58ebd083e8370e2fbc8af4120d87 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 50284 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50284&action=edit preprocessed source original test case before reducing gcc -std=gnu99 -Werror=uninitialized -Werror=maybe-uni

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Btw, clang manages to produce the following, which shows the situation could be worse ;) test_va:# @test_va .cfi_startproc # %bb.0: subq$88, %rsp

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- PIC allows interposing ags_midi_buffer_util_get_varlength and thus possibly initializing the argument. PIE does not allow this so we see it is not initialized. I suppose the change on the branch is for som

  1   2   >