[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Ah, thank you. Well except there is no keyword called that?

[Bug c++/90333] [9/10/11 Regression] Can't apply attributes to lambdas with trailing returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|9.3

[Bug libfortran/99210] X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99210 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Here is the real issue. The X format specifier is a position modifier. UTF-8 is a variable character length encoding so moving one character could mean move 1, 2, 3, or 4 bytes depending on the content of the

[Bug c++/98432] [coroutine] leaked frame created using await_transform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98432 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Tomáš Hering from comment #1) > Created attachment 49839 [details] > preprocessed file that triggers the bug please could you attach the un-preprocessed source? I cannot reproduce this with the pr

[Bug fortran/99307] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/99307] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307 Bug ID: 99307 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Andrew P

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93353] ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93353 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > if (low_int >= 0x8000 - extra) > is not true and 0x7fff - -1 is 0x8000 (with UB on the compiler side). These are HWIs, so there is no UB. > B

[Bug target/93353] ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93353 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #5) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > > I cannot get the reduced testcase to fail. Are any special options needed? > > If you've been asking

[Bug c++/90333] [9/10/11 Regression] Can't apply attributes to lambdas with trailing returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d9d6c1cd8d9f0e057b4a7a849bc765e2109137c commit r11-7430-g5d9d6c1cd8d9f0e057b4a7a849bc765e2109137c Author: Jason Merrill Date: F

[Bug c++/90333] [9/10/11 Regression] Can't apply attributes to lambdas with trailing returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74d34ca781cf94c8b4979c524dbbfbe95863678a commit r9-9254-g74d34ca781cf94c8b4979c524dbbfbe95863678a Author: Jason Merrill Da

[Bug c++/90333] [9/10/11 Regression] Can't apply attributes to lambdas with trailing returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6b1c08e3783bbc3420d95a0357935250d61a29d commit r10-9394-gf6b1c08e3783bbc3420d95a0357935250d61a29d Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/97246] [10 regression] mismatched argument pack lengths since r10-7865-gaedd04caa945260e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f98a3c8a58b3cb39d4073e8a5b2671a5d68b8ce4 commit r10-9393-gf98a3c8a58b3cb39d4073e8a5b2671a5d68b8ce4 Author: Jason Merrill D

[Bug c++/94546] [10 Regression] unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f98a3c8a58b3cb39d4073e8a5b2671a5d68b8ce4 commit r10-9393-gf98a3c8a58b3cb39d4073e8a5b2671a5d68b8ce4 Author: Jason Merrill D

i586 msdosdjgpp compiler ICE

$ i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-g++ -o a a.cc -Ofast -std=c++20 -s -flto In file included from d:\msys64\i586-pc-msdosdjgpp\lib\gcc\i586-pc-msdosdjgpp\11.0.1\include\immintrin.h:43, from ../include/fast_io_core_impl/intrinsics.h:5, from ../include/fast_io_core.h:28,

[Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50268 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50268&action=edit shared_ptr optional no alignment patch

[Bug middle-end/80208] DJGPP max object file alignment regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80208 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #3) > Created attachment 50267 [details] > shared_ptr optional no alignment patch sorry. Wrong place

[Bug middle-end/80208] DJGPP max object file alignment regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80208 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #3 from c

[Bug libstdc++/99306] New: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306 Bug ID: 99306 Summary: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #21 from David Edelsohn --- It similarly continues to fail on AIX: long_double.cc:192: void test02(): Assertion '!memcmp(printf_buffer, to_chars_buffer, output_length)' failed.

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe --- still failing on Darwin at r11-7425 - is that expected (i.e. patches pending) or more analysis needed? long_double.cc:83: test01()::)>: Assertion '!strcmp(begin, printf_buffer+strlen("0x"))' failed.

[Bug fortran/99303] OpenMP: typo in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug fortran/99300] double space in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99300 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/99304] [11 Regression] typo in diagnostic: refernced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99304 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/98979] [11 regression] ICE in several tests cases after r11-7112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98979 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/99305] New: [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 Bug ID: 99305 Summary: [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/99291] maybe_warn_pass_by_reference uses outdated format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99291 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c/99295] [11 Regression] documentation on __attribute__((malloc)) is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Known to work|

[Bug target/99297] wrong diagnostic style in rx.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99297 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99298] diagnostic in name-lookup.c embeds part-of-speech

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99298 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/99300] double space in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99300 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/99303] OpenMP: typo in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99303 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-27 Keywords|

[Bug c/99304] [11 Regression] typo in diagnostic: refernced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99304 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.1 Known to fail|

[Bug c/99304] typo in diagnostic: refernced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99304 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/99301] [11 Regression]: cast conversions in chrono require uint32_t to be unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99301 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/99304] New: typo in diagnostic: refernced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99304 Bug ID: 99304 Summary: typo in diagnostic: refernced Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee

[Bug libstdc++/99301] [11 Regression]: cast conversions in chrono require uint32_t to be unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99301 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:699672d4dccfb5579dbe48977bda86f6836225a0 commit r11-7427-g699672d4dccfb5579dbe48977bda86f6836225a0 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug fortran/99303] OpenMP: typo in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99303 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- same file, other typo: > "clauses on the same construct %L" The "at %L" is missing.

[Bug fortran/99303] OpenMP: typo in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99303 --- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --- This typo appears 2 times.

[Bug fortran/99303] New: OpenMP: typo in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99303 Bug ID: 99303 Summary: OpenMP: typo in diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assig

[Bug fortran/99302] New: untranslated diagnostic from gfc_compare_interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99302 Bug ID: 99302 Summary: untranslated diagnostic from gfc_compare_interfaces Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug libstdc++/99301] [11 Regression]: cast conversions in chrono require uint32_t to be unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99301 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/99301] New: [11 Regression]: cast conversions in chrono require uint32_t to be unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99301 Bug ID: 99301 Summary: [11 Regression]: cast conversions in chrono require uint32_t to be unsigned int Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/99300] New: double space in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99300 Bug ID: 99300 Summary: double space in diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assig

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 --- Comment #40 from Jeffrey Walton --- Still a problem in 2021.

[Bug c/99299] New: Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Bug ID: 99299 Summary: Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap() Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/98979] [11 regression] ICE in several tests cases after r11-7112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98979 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe --- the failures are resolved on Darwin too.

[Bug fortran/50551] Argumentless NULL() cannot be used with assumed-length dummy (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50551 --- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in trunk. The NAG nagfor and Intel ifort compilers detect the issue. gfortran -S gfbug89.f [vitti f95]$nagfor -S -w gfbug89.f NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug89.f,

[Bug target/81319] ICE in output_operand_lossage at final.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81319 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80774] [8/9/10/11 Regression][Coarray] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get, at fortran/trans-array.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80774 --- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in current trunk. gfortran -S gfbug132.f -fcoarray=single gfbug132.f:18:72: 18 | deallocate(obj%link) | 1 interna

[Bug c++/99298] New: diagnostic in name-lookup.c embeds part-of-speech

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99298 Bug ID: 99298 Summary: diagnostic in name-lookup.c embeds part-of-speech Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/85789] Signed integer overflow with nonzero optimization in cse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85789 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in trunk: ~/local/gcc-150221-undefined/bin/gcc -S gccerr67.c -O ../../gcc-150221/gcc/cse.c:2204:34: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 1 - -9223372036854775807 cannot be represented in type 'long

[Bug fortran/50541] gfortran should not accept a pointer as a generic-name (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50541 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca --- The NAG nagfor and Intel ifort detect the issue. gfortran -S gfbug81.f [vitti f95]$nagfor -S gfbug81.f NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug81.f, line 4: Multiply defined symb

[Bug fortran/58224] -fcheck=pointer should detect that an unallocated allocatable data-target is forbidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58224 --- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in trunk. The NAG nagfor compiler detects the issue at compile time. nagfor gfbug103.f NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Warning: gfbug103.f, line 8: Pointer Q never dereference

[Bug middle-end/82083] sanitizer detects signed integer overflow in tree-data-ref.c with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82083 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/99288] xgettext does not get HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99288 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:652623f7c68594b1825a333bf8e83e87d1c3f523 commit r11-7426-g652623f7c68594b1825a333bf8e83e87d1c3f523 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sa

[Bug fortran/50525] gfortran should not allow early reference to entry dummy argument (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525 --- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in trunk. The NAG nagfor and Intel ifort compilers detect the issue. ifort -S -w gfbug72.f gfbug72.f(4): error #6482: An ENTRY dummy argument is referenced in an executable statement before it appear

[Bug middle-end/67486] ira-color.c sanitizer detects signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67486 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 62058, which changed state. Bug 62058 Summary: Undefined behaviour in tree-data-ref.c with options -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62058 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/62058] Undefined behaviour in tree-data-ref.c with options -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62058 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/81986] sanitizer detects negation of large number in string.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81986 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Component|sanitizer |libfortran --- Comment #4 from Vittorio

[Bug fortran/50402] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402 --- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in current trunk. The compilers NAG nagfor and Intel ifort correctly detect a syntax error. nagfor -S -w gfbug43.f NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug43.f, line 12: Sc

[Bug target/93353] ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93353 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- And to explain what was happening, rs6000_legitimize_address has been called on x (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 117) (const_int 2147483647 [0x7fff])) and mode QImode, oldx == x. ((0x7fff & 0x) ^ 0x8000)

[Bug fortran/50538] formal argument cannot be same as procedure name in ENTRY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50538 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still present in current trunk. The compilers NAG nagfor and Intel ifort detect the issue. nagfor -S -w gfbug78.f NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug78.f, line 4: Dummy argu

[Bug fortran/50542] gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still present in version 11. The compilers NAG nagfor and Intel ifort detect the issue. ifort -S -w gfbug82.f -warn stderrors gfbug82.f(9): error #8252: A DATA implied-DO variable must be an array element

[Bug ada/99264] latest glibc release breaks Ada buildr on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99264 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/93353] ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93353 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/50536] an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536 --- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still present in version 11. Detected by NAG nagfor and Intel ifort. [vitti f95]$nagfor -S -w gfbug74.f NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug74.f, line 4: Input item L cannot

[Bug c/99297] New: wrong diagnostic style in rx.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99297 Bug ID: 99297 Summary: wrong diagnostic style in rx.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assigne

[Bug libgcc/67379] libgcc2.c negation of -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67379 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/94442] [10/11 regression] Redundant loads/stores emitted at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442 --- Comment #9 from xiezhiheng at huawei dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > So, is this fixed by any of the > r11-2190-gbf592b2ff776aef71c91924cdb5e0d10488496cf > r11-2448-g072a8b8fb6e861d8ac2db847bcc81dbcb1ef1b35 > r11-2554

[Bug fortran/50377] gfortran must not accept an external formal argument not declared external

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50377 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still present at version 11. The Intel ifort and NAG nagfor compilers decet the issue. nagfor -S gfbug158.f -w NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug158.f, line 3: External proc

[Bug fortran/50535] transformational intrinsic functions not allowed in statement functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50535 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in version 11. Both Intel ifort and NAG nagfor detect the issue. ifort -S gfbug73.f -w gfbug73.f(5): error #6736: This transformational intrinsic function is invalid in this context; statement functio

[Bug testsuite/44798] inconsistent interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44798 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/50549] should detect different type parameters in structure constructors (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50549 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still present on version 11. NAG nagfor compiler detecs it. nagfor -S gfbug87.f -w NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.0(Yurakucho) Build 7042 Error: gfbug87.f, line 13: Wrong character length (1 instead of 2) fo

[Bug testsuite/44922] undefined variable in execute/921202-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44922 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---