https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[x86] Odd code ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98956
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-04
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96bff67d349b134dbcafc5c565ac3ce3a5cf544b
commit r10-9345-g96bff67d349b134dbcafc5c565ac3ce3a5cf544b
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:787f3ebf00d4e1f741ea03b6ddea9cf07a6f94ac
commit r11-7096-g787f3ebf00d4e1f741ea03b6ddea9cf07a6f94ac
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98946
--- Comment #6 from Manoj Gupta ---
Thanks Jakub for the detailed information.
Fangrui has kindly provided a LLD fix at https://reviews.llvm.org/D95994
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96462
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96462
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Probably can be fixed with just
--- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
@@ -5702,6 +5702,13 @@ lookup_using_decl (tree scope, name_lookup &lookup)
if (TREE_CODE (scope) == NAMESPACE_DECL)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b258ac7afaaf7d8157df10ea35c6002d935d7d0
commit r11-7095-g7b258ac7afaaf7d8157df10ea35c6002d935d7d0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96462
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r271467.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97994
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98102
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98948
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 07:00:10AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98948
>
> kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98914
--- Comment #4 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 98958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98958
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98872
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
The problem is caused by using an uninitialized __vector_quad (or
__vector_pair) variable. In those cases, initialize_uninitialized_regs()
detects that and emits an initialization via:
emit_move_insn (reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98966
Bug ID: 98966
Summary: Failure to optimize conditional or with 1 based on
boolean condition to direct or
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98965
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98965
Bug ID: 98965
Summary: assingment to a struct with an atomic member not
atomic
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code, patch
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98947
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect warning when |[10/11 Regression]
|us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98964
Bug ID: 98964
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-52830.C -std=c++14 (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98882
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac16f4327fef5dfc288409371a61649253353ef7
commit r11-7093-gac16f4327fef5dfc288409371a61649253353ef7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021, nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> a) Reject any filename that is -STUFF (allow plain '-')
Any -STUFF that's not a known option should be handled as
OPT_SP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
And after that it always copies r4 bytes, too (rounded down to a multiple
of four bytes).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98963
Bug ID: 98963
Summary: gcc/jit/libgccjit++.h: 20 * function could be const
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98927
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
This issue has come up for both Altivec/VMX (RS6000) and ARM/AARCH64 intrinsics
before. I think they both came up slightly different solutions. I can't
remember fully what the solutions were but from what I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98945
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The relevant rule in ISO C is 6.7.6.3#15 (in C17): "For two function types
to be compatible ... If one type has a parameter type list and the other
type is specified by a function declarato
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
Dominik Gronkiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gronki at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98910
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1a207c6df0a9c017f65f8731acf8d4c14c2
commit r11-7091-gb1a207c6df0a9c017f65f8731acf8d4c14c2
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98962
Bug ID: 98962
Summary: Perform bitops on floats directly with SSE
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98961
Bug ID: 98961
Summary: Failure to optimize successive comparisons with 0 into
clz
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98960
Bug ID: 98960
Summary: Failure to optimize accumulate loop to mul
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 98941, which changed state.
Bug 98941 Summary: [C++23] Implement P0330R2 - Literal Suffixes for ptrdiff_t
and size_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98941
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98941
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96821
Daniil Dudkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #12 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #11)
> It might be that some code optimizes converts
...
> It might be that the either the middle end of GCC does this optimization or
> that valgrind does this in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
This is highlighting a missing diagnostic on:
export module A;
class A; // forward declaration
export class A {}; // <-- here, cannot add 'export'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98958
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-03
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
Bug ID: 98959
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98951
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Thanks for the fast fix.
Since this bug has gone so well, you may like to have a look at # 97894.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98958
Bug ID: 98958
Summary: ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set_var_p8, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7050
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Anyway, the problem discussed in #c2 to #c4 doesn't seem to exist in 10/trunk
anymore, since:
r10-2806-gdf7d46d925c7baca7bf9961aee900876d8aef225
And at least some of the changes that grew size are desirable f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
--- Comment #12 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
@jakub: backported to gcc-8 and gcc-9. OK to close this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a3460f9b79310f40265a902fb394505b947ddd1
commit r8-10751-g3a3460f9b79310f40265a902fb394505b947ddd1
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98951
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98951
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b52a1dfe12a6303c7649f3ff5b8dac6c1001d49a
commit r11-7090-gb52a1dfe12a6303c7649f3ff5b8dac6c1001d49a
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c62e4f255bfac65e18213fd93ee1c9908b4a750
commit r11-7089-g5c62e4f255bfac65e18213fd93ee1c9908b4a750
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c62e4f255bfac65e18213fd93ee1c9908b4a750
commit r11-7089-g5c62e4f255bfac65e18213fd93ee1c9908b4a750
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98957
Bug ID: 98957
Summary: [x86] Odd code generation for 8-bit left shift
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98937
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98937
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c3d388aee5609d32bd8e3ba1add776b1a6f0d1f
commit r11-7088-g5c3d388aee5609d32bd8e3ba1add776b1a6f0d1f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98590
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #10)
> > Kludge to work around configure breakage. Not pretty, but at least it lets
> > bootstrap w/ Ada succeed on Cygwin.
>
> OK, let's go for this. Can you po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #9 from Andrea Corallo ---
Right I'll rework the patch.
Thanks
Right I'll rework the patch.
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18c03dc19860996b890196d0c809f5bd47010ebc
commit r10-9343-g18c03dc19860996b890196d0c809f5bd47010ebc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c926940f528e689100574a0c600e37548239adab
commit r11-7085-gc926940f528e689100574a0c600e37548239adab
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98933
Mark changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98956
Bug ID: 98956
Summary: Failure to optimize out boolean left shift
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] aarch64: |[10 Regression] aarch64:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98955
Bug ID: 98955
Summary: Failure to optimize shift+compare to single shift
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] produces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98951
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or if le lr,lab can only branch backwards, maybe
b 2f; 1: b lab; 2: le lr, 1b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't think one can use get_attr_length until very late, at least definitely
not reliably, distances can shrink or grow a lot by other passes.
Is there some reason why the doloop_end insn pattern can't do w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860
--- Comment #24 from Nix ---
... and ten seconds after I posted that it failed again. Looks like binutils
isn't quite ready for DWARF 5 on Windows yet :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860
--- Comment #23 from Nix ---
OK, that works: ignore me, in my case it was just using a too old binutils.
(The error message emitted is... unhelpful: exec format error, really?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98947
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98954
Bug ID: 98954
Summary: Failure to optimize left shift+and pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Corallo ---
I'm testing the attached fix.
I'm testing the attached fix.
>From 6de0603f3a5c86396d44250cb34d4451528681b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Corallo
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:21:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Add low overhead loop address range check [PR98931]
2021-02-03 Andrea Corallo
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25fdd0d6df44044a8b505e6fcd07270e2e279b06
commit r11-7065-g25fdd0d6df44044a8b505e6fcd07270e2e279b06
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab1aa8c0044aeff22dccae3170571a8ddeea5935
commit r10-9342-gab1aa8c0044aeff22dccae3170571a8ddeea5935
Author: Nathan Sidwell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98866
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks for the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #10)
> lhs_caf_attr.codimension is uninitialised.
It is clear that lhs_caf_attr is uninitialized
- if and only if flag_coarray != GFC_FCOARRAY_LIB
It might be that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98953
Bug ID: 98953
Summary: Failure to optimize two reads from adjacent addresses
into one
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98881
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 50120
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50120&action=edit
reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
spotted the 'file file' typo in the linker error, btw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 50119
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50119&action=edit
proposed direction
Here's a test patch. As Jakub points out, we pass -d$ANYTHING to the compiler,
it is the f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97932
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98855
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50118
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50118&action=edit
testcase
Testcase reproducing the bad SLP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For -diag-disable , even gcc 10 would just warn on that rather than error:
gcc -S -diag-disable -xc /dev/null
cc1: warning: unrecognized gcc debugging option: i
cc1: warning: unrecognized gcc debugging option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
I added the debug lines
fprintf( stderr, "%d\n", flag_coarray);
fprintf( stderr, "%d\n", lhs_caf_attr.codimension);
fprintf( stderr, "%d\n", rhs_caf_attr.codimension);
fprintf( stderr, "%d\n", lhs
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo