https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98674, which changed state.
Bug 98674 Summary: [10 Regression] vectorizer failed for compilation time alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #6 from Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70454
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98695
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98696
Bug ID: 98696
Summary: ICE when build x86_64-elf-cross compiler with
MinGW-w64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98674, which changed state.
Bug 98674 Summary: [10 Regression] vectorizer failed for compilation time alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98695
Bug ID: 98695
Summary: cc1: error: ‘-fcf-protection’ is not compatible with
this target
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The "warninb" says
warning: ‘void* memcpy(void*, const void*, long unsigned int)’ writing 32
bytes into a region of size 8 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=]
It says it is wrong, so it i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98694
Bug ID: 98694
Summary: GCC produces incorrect code for loops with -O3 for
skylake-avx512 and icelake-server
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98673
--- Comment #2 from jojo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The analysis sounds a bit confused. What is the transform that DOM cannot
> do after the transform that FRE does? There's some older bug about
> out-of-SSA
> coalescing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98687
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Adjusted test:
extern "C" namespace std {
double log1p(double);
}
namespace std_fallback {
template void log1p();
}
template struct log1p_impl {
static int run() {
using std::log1p;
using std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98629
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98693
Bug ID: 98693
Summary: Compiling with -mcmodel=large emits .eh_frame with
R_X86_64_PC32
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98646
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674
--- Comment #9 from Eugene Rozenfeld ---
I used XXX_MIN for consistency with comments on other patterns. If TYPE_MIN is
preferable, the change should be made in all of those comments as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Further poking revealed that the patch above mishandles
// PR c++/86769
// { dg-do run }
#define assert(X) do { if (!(X)) __builtin_abort(); } while(0)
int g;
struct X {
X() { g++; }
~X() { g--; }
o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70454
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
--- Comment #12 from Jiangning Liu
---
MGO RFC is at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-January/234682.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98586
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98586
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:387f6c15d303a8f8da508e419fea10a6ef0e2590
commit r11-6700-g387f6c15d303a8f8da508e419fea10a6ef0e2590
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 49969
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49969
Optimize combination of comparisons to dec+compare
>+/* y == XXX_MIN || x < y --> x <= y - 1 */
Can we use TYPE_MIN inste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97223
--- Comment #4 from Eugene Rozenfeld ---
The commit that fixed this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=32ee472864ada44ef05b2a3b087b8ce413bee282
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98692
--- Comment #1 from Nick Child ---
Created attachment 49971
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49971&action=edit
source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98692
Bug ID: 98692
Summary: Unitialized Values reported only with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674
--- Comment #7 from Eugene Rozenfeld ---
Thank you for the feedback, Gabriel and Jakub. I re-worked the patch based on
your suggestions. I attached the new patch and also sent it to gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674
Eugene Rozenfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49940|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98679
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98691
Bug ID: 98691
Summary: co_await in a conditional operator evaluates an
unreachable code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98679
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a18261afd923151b8d2a37f667e4673b27acd3f
commit r11-6689-g8a18261afd923151b8d2a37f667e4673b27acd3f
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> > I'm not sure if solving this would bring us anything.
>
> For clarity, at very most a 4% reduction in the size of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 96984, which changed state.
Bug 96984 Summary: bogus -Warray-bounds with -fsanitize due to FRE substituting
subobjects at the same address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96984
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 96984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96984
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98471
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Should be fixed now.
thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98690
Bug ID: 98690
Summary: unexpected "'removed_return.213' may be used
uninitialized in this function" causes crash
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdd1b1f55529da00b867ef05a53a08fbfc3d1c2e
commit r11-6687-gbdd1b1f55529da00b867ef05a53a08fbfc3d1c2e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689
Bug ID: 98689
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-1.c
-O1 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015
--- Comment #39 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I tried the few test cases listed in this PR with gcc-11 on sparcv9-linux-gnu,
but wasn't able to observe any miscompilation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98688
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't know if this is the right thing to do, but ignoring the opaque type
here make the ICE go away. I suspect I need to construct a module test case
using vector_pair/vector_quad to really tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The commit in comment#4 unfortunately contained debugging stuff that should
never have been pushed. Thus reverted and created the new commit in comment#5.
Sorry for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98687
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98688
Bug ID: 98688
Summary: C++ modules support does not work on PowerPC with
opaque MMA types vector_pair/vector_quad
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98687
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98687
Bug ID: 98687
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that
contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in
diagnose_name_conflict, at cp/name-lookup.c:2729 since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e1e6e631045c7eed2c72738b7084986d39ca09f
commit r11-6681-g9e1e6e631045c7eed2c72738b7084986d39ca09f
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98661
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0d2becf2dfe8316c9014d962e7f3ec5c27e
commit r11-6679-gd0d2becf2dfe8316c9014d962e7f3ec5c27e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9267925c648f2ccd9e4680b699e581003125bcf
commit r8-10728-gf9267925c648f2ccd9e4680b699e581003125bcf
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
F2018:
8.9 NAMELIST statement
(5) A namelist group object shall either be accessed by use or host association
or shall have its declared type, kind type parameters of the declared type, and
rank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ac3e2feb3da89eda7a783d2c675ec897e81b338
commit r11-6678-g9ac3e2feb3da89eda7a783d2c675ec897e81b338
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f1e1069a753e912b058f0d4bf599f0edde28408
commit r9-9182-g0f1e1069a753e912b058f0d4bf599f0edde28408
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e56a7c9a6631b217299b2ddcd5c4d497bb3445e
commit r10-9270-g1e56a7c9a6631b217299b2ddcd5c4d497bb3445e
Author: Thomas Schwing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6106dfb9f73a33c87108ad5b2dcd4842bdd7828e
commit r11-6677-g6106dfb9f73a33c87108ad5b2dcd4842bdd7828e
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Resolved by backporting r11-4706:
$ make check-obj-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=template-4.mm
=== obj-c++ Summary ===
# of expected passes2
/home/mpolacek/x/gcc10/gcc/xg++ version 10.2.1 20210114 (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
In this case I've already sent the change out for review at
https://golang.org/cl/283692 and they should go in today (as before, this
process would go faster if you were able to send changes using Gerrit)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686
Bug ID: 98686
Summary: Namelist group objects shall be defined before
appearing in namelist for -std=f2018
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> I'm not sure if solving this would bring us anything.
For clarity, at very most a 4% reduction in the size of the stack frame
for function ix86_parse_stringop_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98683
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Maybe TARGET_CANONICALIZE_COMPARISON would help here? x86 had a similar issue
with ficom x87 insn where float RTX was always the first operand, but the
compare was with the float extend of the second one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98685
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98685
Bug ID: 98685
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE verify_flow_info failed since
r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015
--- Comment #38 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
sparc might be able to trip this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98471
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98471
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57a4f5e4eacfbbbd0ca5f1e3f946c27d63e2b533
commit r11-6676-g57a4f5e4eacfbbbd0ca5f1e3f946c27d63e2b533
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98471
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #13 from Marko Mäkelä ---
Thank you. I have reported this upstream:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980110
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98646
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Or, disable it when we call build_base_path with nonnull == 1?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98646
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> Confirmed. It must be an instance we missed in the fix for pr96003 where
> the C++ front end adds a COND_EXPR to static_cast.
>
> The larger context in the trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
Seems to have gone latent for the previous testcases, but still ICEs for:
extern int a[];
extern long b[];
char c;
long d;
void e(_Bool f[], long g[]) {
for (int h; h; h += 1) {
a[h] = c < f[0];
b[h]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98595
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98595
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sebastian Huber :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa3d33dccb57621b2ab2029dce79208c0c9392c1
commit r11-6675-gaa3d33dccb57621b2ab2029dce79208c0c9392c1
Author: Sebastian Huber
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
Bug 95021 depends on bug 98676, which changed state.
Bug 98676 Summary: [11 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthew Whitehead from comment #1)
> Here is the full set of compiler flags used.
>
> readelf --string-dump='.GCC.command.line' /usr/lib/debug/$( which eix
> ).debug
>
> String dump of section '.G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77d372abec0fbf2cfe922e3140ee3410248f979e
commit r11-6672-g77d372abec0fbf2cfe922e3140ee3410248f979e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jan 14 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
--- Comment #12 from Marius Hillenbrand ---
found a miscompilation in gnat1 (that I can trigger to cause a segfault),
a loop in sem_res.adb:2405 in procedure Resolve (N : Node_Id; Typ : Entity_Id)
while Present (It.Typ) loop
Get_Next_Interp (I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
--- Comment #4 from Gabriel Ravier ---
This code :
typedef int64_t v2di __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
v2di f(__m128 val)
{
return (~(v2di)_mm_set_ps1(0.0f) & (v2di)val);
}
is optimized better (and is equivalent, if I understand the se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98674, which changed state.
Bug 98674 Summary: [10 Regression] vectorizer failed for compilation time alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98674, which changed state.
Bug 98674 Summary: [10 Regression] vectorizer failed for compilation time alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression] vectorizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2182274f510c180ea92a4f826a0f6cf5f1f55b66
commit r11-6670-g2182274f510c180ea92a4f826a0f6cf5f1f55b66
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95276
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.2.1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a512079ef40e442c1269ea1cc55f18790ba68449
commit r11-6669-ga512079ef40e442c1269ea1cc55f18790ba68449
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jan 14 06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a512079ef40e442c1269ea1cc55f18790ba68449
commit r11-6669-ga512079ef40e442c1269ea1cc55f18790ba68449
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jan 14 06:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98679
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from David Malco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
> Created attachment 49966
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49966&action=edit
> A patch
>
> STV is disabled by
[...]
> Please try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98684
Bug ID: 98684
Summary: -Wswitch interaction with "case X ... Y" -- warns for
X and Y not being in the enum, but not X+1, X+2, ...
Y-1
Product: gcc
Version: unknow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49966
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49966&action=edit
A patch
STV is disabled by
/* Disable STV if -mpreferred-stack-boundary={2,3} or
-mincoming-stack-boundary={2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98683
Bug ID: 98683
Summary: Non-canonical compare produced with the VAX backend
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
