https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021, jiangning.liu at amperecomputing dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jiangning Liu
> ---
> (In reply to rguent...@sus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Yes, I think so. = {} has the advantage that the destination isn't
address-taken compared to memset which has alias analysis benefits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
Also found some dead code in ix86_expand_sse_comi which is called by
if (fcode >= IX86_BUILTIN__BDESC_COMI_FIRST
&& fcode <= IX86_BUILTIN__BDESC_COMI_LAST)
where all builtins are defined with flags as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Guillaume Piolat from comment #0)
> Created attachment 49926 [details]
> Behaviour with 3 compilers
>
> _mm_comieq_sd has different NaN semantics for different people.
>
> # The Unordered team
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a1d7f7e203d0ec4b9d67ea6fc9b84bee1e211d3
commit r11-6573-g4a1d7f7e203d0ec4b9d67ea6fc9b84bee1e211d3
Author: David Edelsohn
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a1d7f7e203d0ec4b9d67ea6fc9b84bee1e211d3
commit r11-6573-g4a1d7f7e203d0ec4b9d67ea6fc9b84bee1e211d3
Author: David Edelsohn
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #4 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98617
Bug ID: 98617
Summary: Failure to recognize pack expansion argument for
non-pack parameter of alias template when alias is
"exact"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82480
--- Comment #5 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Since it is an extension that makes perfect sense to me. Backward-compatible
and solves the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > > Possibly in discovering pure/constness. See uses of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #10 from Svante Signell ---
Hello,
The 6 attached patches are improving the build and tests of gccgo for Hurd.
Attachment 49931 is needed for libgo to build, while the other are improving
the tests of libgo,go and gotools. Attachment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #9 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49935
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49935&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #8 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49934&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #7 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49933&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #6 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49932&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #5 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49931&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #4 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49930
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49930&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98616
--- Comment #1 from tong__hui at 163 dot com ---
Created attachment 49929
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49929&action=edit
gcc-build-logs
gcc build logs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98616
Bug ID: 98616
Summary: Compile gcc 10.2.0 error for loongson 2f CPU use MIPS
n32 ABI on Gentoo OS
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97402
--- Comment #3 from Amir Kirsh ---
Playing with the code even leads to compiler seg-fault, see:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/65654043/2085626
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97402
Amir Kirsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kirshamir at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98615
Bug ID: 98615
Summary: libgccjit crash while freeing 'clone_info' in
'cgraph_c_finalize'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
23 matches
Mail list logo
