https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc9b9c0b68233d38a26f7acd68cc5f9a8fc4d994
commit r11-5956-gcc9b9c0b68233d38a26f7acd68cc5f9a8fc4d994
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98251
Bug ID: 98251
Summary: libgcc on 32-bit soft-float ARM narrows -NaN
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98250
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
After UB anything can happen, just don't invoke UB in your programs.
Please read e.g. https://blog.regehr.org/archives/213
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98250
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98250
Bug ID: 98250
Summary: Wrong code path with -O1 and signed overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
Bug ID: 98249
Summary: Improper ADL on the `arg` in `new (arg) T`
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56f83e64e179f2ff5bb4161db076d7e6ae1c0a3f
commit r8-10675-g56f83e64e179f2ff5bb4161db076d7e6ae1c0a3f
Author: Harald Anlauf
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:342be4dce16630575e2de21dbeec4baaed7a143a
commit r9-9109-g342be4dce16630575e2de21dbeec4baaed7a143a
Author: Harald Anlauf
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9324f7a25c7161a813bfae6cc2d180784b165740
commit r11-5954-g9324f7a25c7161a813bfae6cc2d180784b165740
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 11, 2020 6:51:05 PM GMT+01:00, "segher at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
>
>--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
>Yes, that is cle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Summary|[9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And corresponding OpenMP -fopenmp -fexceptions -O0:
void bar ();
int x, y;
void
foo (void)
{
#pragma omp target data map(tofrom: x)
{
#pragma omp target data map(tofrom: y)
bar ();
}
}
ICEs too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase:
void bar (void);
void
foo (void)
{
#pragma acc data
{
#pragma acc host_data
bar ();
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With these options one of the #pragma omp return statements is not removed from
the IL, which must be done during the ompexp pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98248
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98248
Bug ID: 98248
Summary: [11 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O3
-msve-vector-bits=256
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98053
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97723
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35718
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, that is clear... But we have ***double*** x in that example even,
as the declared type of the parameter, so converting that to float is
almost certainly a bad idea?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
--- Comment #14 from Rogério de Souza Moraes
---
Created attachment 49747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49747&action=edit
File which all the 'try' macros are taken out to separate routines, for build
performance improvemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
--- Comment #13 from Rogério de Souza Moraes
---
Created attachment 49746
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49746&action=edit
File that reproduces the current structure and has performance issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
Rogério de Souza Moraes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogerio.souza at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68778
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I see the valgrind errors in comment 4 up to r241883 (2016-11-06). From r241924
(2016-11-07) up to r265319 (2018-10-19) I don't see them anymore but a lot of
MacOS related libraries. Finally after r265
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #10 from Andrea Corallo ---
"acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
> Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the IC
"acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
> Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same
> testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49745
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49745&action=edit
gcc11-pr96685.patch
Updated patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98247
Bug ID: 98247
Summary: gcc analyzer does not detect Flexible Array Member
misuse
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same
testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my first
message).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95768
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Sort of. Richard has some objections that we never resolved but but I'm still
planning to dust it off and resubmit it in some form for GCC 11 with the
corresponding C front end changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
Bug ID: 98246
Summary: [11 Regression] Linux kernel build fails after
6fbec038f7a7
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:078c7498908d9b74caff34d12099b5c85470e277
commit r11-5939-g078c7498908d9b74caff34d12099b5c85470e277
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Dec 9 18:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 78173, which changed state.
Bug 78173 Summary: Hard error subtracting pointers to incomplete type in SFINAE
context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:958d42abdf1a1936d290aab126cebd6bb4a52361
commit r11-5936-g958d42abdf1a1936d290aab126cebd6bb4a52361
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #18)
> Why is it correct to convert the double x to single precision here?!
For
float foo(float f, float x, float y) {
return (fabs(f)*x+y);
}
it is not unles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97723
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Please see PR97694 for a patch that fixes both PRs at once.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, so for GENERIC it seems to be the associate: in fold_binary_loc that
converts
~x + y created by this patch into (y - x) + 1, and we don't have an equivalent
for that in GIMPLE.
So, shall I restrict this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why is it correct to convert the double x to single precision here?!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, there is some canonicalization problem GENERIC vs. GIMPLE:
unsigned
f1 (unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
unsigned int r = (x - y);
return ~r;
}
unsigned
f2 (unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
unsigned int r =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49742&action=edit
gcc11-pr96685.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab231af9ccd61b9b05ad35c04a79b32343904209
commit r11-5933-gab231af9ccd61b9b05ad35c04a79b32343904209
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49741
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49741&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bb-slp-46.c.244t.optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Bug ID: 98245
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-46.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49740
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49740&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-live-6.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Bug ID: 98244
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-live-6.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
Oleg Zaikin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49739
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49739&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 simd-2.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b488a2e695b6868cfb69c65b8e2943ea31c335c
commit r11-5932-g4b488a2e695b6868cfb69c65b8e2943ea31c335c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Bug ID: 98243
Summary: gcc.dg/gomp/simd-2.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49738
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49738&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bb-slp-subgroups-3.c.178t.slp2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Bug ID: 98242
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fc3bf781d15a9fa260395bd72472224f42e3ce1
commit r11-5931-g0fc3bf781d15a9fa260395bd72472224f42e3ce1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98241
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Summary|gcc.dg/vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98241
Bug ID: 98241
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr78973.c XPASSes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Zaikin ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10)
> But why you are trying to use a more complex branchy expression in C++17
> mode when you already have a more efficient expression as a "fallback"?
>
> Note t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
It's not just the scans that fail:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/modref-3 c_lto_modref-3_0.o-c_lto_modref-3_1.o execute -O2
-flto-partition=max -fdump-ipa-modref -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp -flto
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/modref-4 c_l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Zaikin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> That needs to be investigated, but it's a problem with the compiler. It has
> nothing to do with countr_one being implemented using countr_zero (as shown
> by th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|
Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:955af69b7376ebd05051c02455d71c90258f5e24
commit r11-5930-g955af69b7376ebd05051c02455d71c90258f5e24
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49737&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 pr97678.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Bug ID: 98240
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr97678.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49736
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49736&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bb-slp-69.c.178t.slp2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Bug ID: 98239
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-69.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Please try:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561484.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98238
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49735
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49735&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-cost-model-1.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98238
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98238
Bug ID: 98238
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
Bug ID: 98237
Summary: gcc-dg-lto-modref-3-01.exe etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo