[Bug testsuite/98114] [11 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vandnpd-2.c execution test caused by r11-5391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98114 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98113] [11 Regression] popcnt is not vectorized on s390 since f5e18dd9c7da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98113 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ta

[Bug middle-end/98099] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/98099] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/95293] Fortran not passing array by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > Could this PR be closed as INVALID? Yes, I think so.

[Bug libstdc++/98108] Broken Schwarz counter for iostreams initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I think this is undefined since global object initialization order is not well-defined between TUs so thread1/thread2 and std::cout construction are not well-ordered. It probably works (by accident) when do

[Bug tree-optimization/98107] [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug target/98114] [11 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vandnpd-2.c execution test caused by r11-5391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98114 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Looking at testcase there's are pointer type conversion void CALC (double *s1, double *s2, double *r) { int i; long long tmp; for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) { tmp = (~(*(long long *) &s1[i])) & (*

[Bug c++/98105] constexpr and unnamed namespace yields relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol ... can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98105 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c++/98104] [11 regression] -Wplacement-new false positive (struture padding?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/98102] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected block, have function_decl in change_scope, at final.c:1480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98102 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Keywords|

[Bug c++/98101] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- VTV has it's issues and needs quite some TLC

[Bug target/98100] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5610

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #1 from Richard Bien

[Bug target/98114] New: [11 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vandnpd-2.c execution test caused by r11-5391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98114 Bug ID: 98114 Summary: [11 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vandnpd-2.c execution test caused by r11-5391 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug target/96906] Failure to optimize __builtin_ia32_psubusw128 compared to 0 to __builtin_ia32_pminuw128 compared to operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96906 --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC11.

[Bug target/96906] Failure to optimize __builtin_ia32_psubusw128 compared to 0 to __builtin_ia32_pminuw128 compared to operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96906 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70310982492071f98eacdac0747521769b0f0328 commit r11-5697-g70310982492071f98eacdac0747521769b0f0328 Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Nov 3

[Bug target/97642] Incorrect replacement of vmovdqu32 with vpblendd can cause fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97642 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC11, GCC10 is fine, no need to backport.

[Bug target/97642] Incorrect replacement of vmovdqu32 with vpblendd can cause fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97642 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35c4c67e6c534ef3d6ba7a7752ab7e0fbc91755b commit r11-5696-g35c4c67e6c534ef3d6ba7a7752ab7e0fbc91755b Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Nov 3

[Bug target/89057] [8/9/10/11 Regression] AArch64 ld3 st4 less optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057 --- Comment #8 from Abhiraj Garakapati --- Also, cross-checked it with the latest GCC version GCC-8.4.0 with above mentioned reverting changes of "aarch64-simd.md" file and got the expected output same as GCC-7.3.0.

[Bug tree-optimization/98113] [11 Regression] popcnt is not vectorized on s390 since f5e18dd9c7da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98113 --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #1) > (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #0) > > s390's vxe/popcount-1.c began to fail after PR96789 fix. > > Sorry to see this regression. > > ... > > > > > that i

[Bug tree-optimization/98113] [11 Regression] popcnt is not vectorized on s390 since f5e18dd9c7da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98113 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/97770] [ICELAKE]Missing vectorization for vpopcnt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770 --- Comment #13 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Hmm, but > > DEF_INTERNAL_INT_FN (POPCOUNT, ECF_CONST | ECF_NOTHROW, popcount, unary) > > so there's clearly a mismatch between either the vectorizers interpre

[Bug target/97770] [ICELAKE]Missing vectorization for vpopcnt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81d590760c31e11e3a09135f4e182aea232035f2 commit r11-5693-g81d590760c31e11e3a09135f4e182aea232035f2 Author: Hongyu Wang Date: Wed N

[Bug target/98093] ICE in gen_vsx_set_v2df, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3276

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093 --- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555907.html [PATCH 3/4] rs6000: Enable vec_insert for P8 with rs6000_expand_vector_set_var_p8

[Bug target/98093] ICE in gen_vsx_set_v2df, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3276

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/98113] New: [11 Regression] popcnt is not vectorized on s390 since f5e18dd9c7da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98113 Bug ID: 98113 Summary: [11 Regression] popcnt is not vectorized on s390 since f5e18dd9c7da Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/98112] New: Add -fdirect-access-external-data & drop HAVE_LD_PIE_COPYRELOC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98112 Bug ID: 98112 Summary: Add -fdirect-access-external-data & drop HAVE_LD_PIE_COPYRELOC Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/98109] Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/98111] [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98111 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #34 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- (In reply to abebeos from comment #29) [...] > I will today focus on publishing my test-setup, so that my test-results can > be peer-reviewed. Should be available within 12 hours, max 36. [...]

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com ---

[Bug ipa/98106] [11 Regression] gcc trunk miscompiles glibc dynamic loader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97947] [11 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97947 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/98111] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98111 Bug ID: 98111 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97947] [11 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97947 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e231b2cfbfa5f99bbf581555ca74eaaba42ad7f commit r11-5687-g7e231b2cfbfa5f99bbf581555ca74eaaba42ad7f Author: Peter Bergner Date: We

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] New: [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 Bug ID: 98110 Summary: [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug c++/80780] Front-end support needed for experimental::source_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba3d8dffcc1c23b30370ab24fc20d09cff005d7b commit r11-5685-gba3d8dffcc1c23b30370ab24fc20d09cff005d7b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/93093] __builtin_source_location reports values for default arguments not aligned with the Standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93093 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba3d8dffcc1c23b30370ab24fc20d09cff005d7b commit r11-5685-gba3d8dffcc1c23b30370ab24fc20d09cff005d7b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug ipa/98106] [11 Regression] gcc trunk miscompiles glibc dynamic loader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98106 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Summary|gcc trunk

[Bug ipa/98106] gcc trunk miscompiles glibc dynamic loader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98106 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug inline-asm/98096] Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Ke

[Bug middle-end/98109] New: Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 Bug ID: 98109 Summary: Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug rtl-optimization/97777] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:3991 with -O -ffinite-math-only -fzero-call-used-regs=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/97777] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:3991 with -O -ffinite-math-only -fzero-call-used-regs=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cace1cd683318e83e8a613f1aa2f2b16e37a342 commit r11-5684-g2cace1cd683318e83e8a613f1aa2f2b16e37a342 Author: qing zhao Date: Wed Dec 2

[Bug libfortran/95293] Fortran not passing array by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Could this PR be closed as INVALID?

[Bug libfortran/35014] Libgfortran.a (downloaded) is not PIC compiled...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The manual says: > On systems that provide libgfortran as a shared and a static library, > this option forces the use of the static version. If no shared version > of libgfortran was built when the c

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/65480] libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc test failures on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65480 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/65480] libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc test failures on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65480 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc2b372ed1b1e9af6db45051cff95478c7616807 commit r11-5683-gdc2b372ed1b1e9af6db45051cff95478c7616807 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc2b372ed1b1e9af6db45051cff95478c7616807 commit r11-5683-gdc2b372ed1b1e9af6db45051cff95478c7616807 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/65480] libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc test failures on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65480 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/98108] New: Broken Schwarz counter for iostreams initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108 Bug ID: 98108 Summary: Broken Schwarz counter for iostreams initialization Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > > So the new compiler does compile-time simplification already at -O0, > > while older versions maybe not. > > Is this expected? Depends. I'd

[Bug fortran/97024] Overriding finalization on polymorphic types triggers ICE error in generate_finalization_wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/98107] New: [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107 Bug ID: 98107 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96839] gfortran thinks common_bits starts a common block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96839 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94464] [F08] coarrays shoud be enabled by default.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94464 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/98106] gcc trunk miscompiles glibc dynamic loader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/97612] Structure constructor of type with nested allocatable array components fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97612 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/98106] New: gcc trunk miscompiles glibc dynamic loader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98106 Bug ID: 98106 Summary: gcc trunk miscompiles glibc dynamic loader Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug target/98060] Failure to optimize cmp+setnb+add to cmp+sbb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98060 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49663|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69bf1c7d5ee21392334f1982d1b40c38e103bbd4 commit r11-5678-g69bf1c7d5ee21392334f1982d1b40c38e103bbd4 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/97187] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97187 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97993] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19834 since r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97993 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97187] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97187 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4192ffd74c69e3fb6d761becc8e5117c3de42052 commit r11-5677-g4192ffd74c69e3fb6d761becc8e5117c3de42052 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Mo

[Bug c++/97993] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19834 since r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97993 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4192ffd74c69e3fb6d761becc8e5117c3de42052 commit r11-5677-g4192ffd74c69e3fb6d761becc8e5117c3de42052 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Mo

[Bug tree-optimization/98095] Optimize __builtin_unordered (...) || __builtin_is{less,greater}{,equal}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98095 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- There's no __builtin_isequal because == and != don't raise exceptions for quiet NaNs anyway. (The lack of __builtin_iseqsig is bug 77928.)

[Bug rtl-optimization/97836] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r11-5029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, can this be closed as fixed or do you want to do something further?

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/98104] [11 regression] -Wplacement-new false positive (struture padding?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98104 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98105] New: constexpr and unnamed namespace yields relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol ... can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98105 Bug ID: 98105 Summary: constexpr and unnamed namespace yields relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol ... can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

[Bug c++/98104] New: [11 regression] -Wplacement-new false positive (struture padding?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98104 Bug ID: 98104 Summary: [11 regression] -Wplacement-new false positive (struture padding?) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/97457] [10 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/97904] ICE with AArch64 SVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Currently, we also have the following two additional fails: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/91997.cc print a FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/91997.cc print a

[Bug rtl-optimization/98037] ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/97457] [10 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75a5af680a1788ba844902fd0681958da8e2a4ce commit r10-9112-g75a5af680a1788ba844902fd0681958da8e2a4ce Author: Richard Sand

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Ah, I think the problem is that Python 2 has a 42-bit int 32-bit of course. But there's also something else going on. I have a patch.

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98072] [9/10 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_omp_var_list_no_open, at cp/parser.c:34843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug ipa/98082] [11 Regression] ICE in set_rtl, at cfgexpand.c:178 since r11-3257-g225a08220e444371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98082 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-02 Keywords|

[Bug c++/98103] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Bug ID: 98103 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

[Bug c++/98101] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98102] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected block, have function_decl in change_scope, at final.c:1480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98102 Bug ID: 98102 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected block, have function_decl in change_scope, at final.c:1480 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/98101] New: ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101 Bug ID: 98101 Summary: ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 --- Comment #10 from Bhavana Kilambi --- Created attachment 49664 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49664&action=edit Removes the push_back() statement

[Bug c/98100] New: ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5610

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100 Bug ID: 98100 Summary: ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5610 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 --- Comment #9 from Bhavana Kilambi --- Hi, The problem seems to be with the code in add_line_counts() function in gcov.c. Specifically with this statement - line->blocks.push_back (block); This line is present inside the line!= NULL condition

[Bug c/98099] New: ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099 Bug ID: 98099 Summary: ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug inline-asm/69899] gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "replace_reg"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69899 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #4 from G.

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah, I think the problem is that Python 2 has a 42-bit int and so casting a big endian pointer to int loses half the bits.

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g.bonacci at libero dot it --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/98098] std::call_once throws std::system_error in statically linked executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98098 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >