https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97668
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96967
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96767
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96770
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3c3e2c9e88e25a410a2fe089782b094e911bb39
commit r11-4599-gc3c3e2c9e88e25a410a2fe089782b094e911bb39
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96967
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d9af90d6a216822fe117337fb9836ba656dc3af
commit r11-4598-g4d9af90d6a216822fe117337fb9836ba656dc3af
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
nternal compiler error: in cmp_cst, at analyzer/svalue.cc:283
0x71ef8e cmp_cst
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201101/work/gcc-11-20201101/gcc/analyzer/svalue.cc:283
0x18aca58 cmp1
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha202011
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667
Bug ID: 97667
Summary: a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97666
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97666
Bug ID: 97666
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap fail for powerpc-darwin
while building libgfortran after r11-4485
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97665
--- Comment #1 from Luke Dalessandro ---
(In reply to Luke Dalessandro from comment #0)
> GCC currently rejects the following code snippet, where it infers the
> constexpr definition of V as non-constexpr.
The definition of `v`, not the type `V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97665
Bug ID: 97665
Summary: constexpr union array member incorrectly rejected as
non-constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:895fdc1f4c9ff1dfb18b80af838aa353363edb40
commit r11-4592-g895fdc1f4c9ff1dfb18b80af838aa353363edb40
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
Suggested fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/557691.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97662
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97664
Bug ID: 97664
Summary: constexpr evaluation incorrectly accepts non-constant
destruction
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Bug ID: 97663
Summary: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested
namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this patch fixes the ICE, though I think we do have a design issue here
while producing debug info across ltrans boundary.
Martin, Jakub: as discussed on IRC it would be nice to add predicate
when the body
Hi,
this patch fixes the ICE, though I think we do have a design issue here
while producing debug info across ltrans boundary.
Martin, Jakub: as discussed on IRC it would be nice to add predicate
when the body is really needed and avoid materializing if it is not.
Can you add one?
Something like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97662
Bug ID: 97662
Summary: [11 Regression] r11-4587 breaks non-bootstrap build
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97661
Bug ID: 97661
Summary: Bogus error message about initializing a using
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
The call statement being looked at by cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_to_callee
is:
# .MEM = VDEF <.MEM>
_47 = __sync_val_compare_and_swap_8 (ptr_45, 0, new_node.0_46);
cgraph_node::get returns NULL on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> __builtin_coro_resume and __builtin_coro_destroy delete the memory.
> Everything goes downhill after it.
thanks for the analysis - I will hopefully take a look later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
__builtin_coro_resume and __builtin_coro_destroy delete the memory.
Everything goes downhill after it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660
Bug ID: 97660
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in
function_summary::get(cgraph_node*) since
r11-4587
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97655
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Guess the second condition should be !c->capture.
I concur.
> Now, something I have clearly missed in the review, why is capture not part
> of atomic_op? capt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> That sanitizer diagnoses
> http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#5.3
> which still seems UB.
Not since http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p0593r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
--- Comment #4 from Paweł Bylica ---
I'd like to explain some things here (to my best knowledge):
1. The "pointer-subtract" checks is ASan extension, not enabled by default.
When running with this check enabled in my application I have not detec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96735
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
39 matches
Mail list logo
