h_node failed
0x96b8d8 cgraph_node::verify_node()
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201025/work/gcc-11-20201025/gcc/cgraph.c:3783
0x95b3a4 symtab_node::verify()
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201025/work/gcc-11-20201025/gcc/symtab.c:1318
0xe44a5d expand_call_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49438|divisiontable.dat |divisiontable.txt
filename|
: internal compiler error: in
propagate_controlled_uses, at ipa-prop.c:4073
17 | }
| ^
0x677dc7 propagate_controlled_uses
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201025/work/gcc-11-20201025/gcc/ipa-prop.c:4073
0x677dc7 ipa_propagate_indirect_call_infos(cgraph_edge*, vec*)
/var
/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201025/work/gcc-11-20201025/gcc/ipa-prop.c:3671
0x73eaf7 update_indirect_edges_after_inlining
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201025/work/gcc-11-20201025/gcc/ipa-prop.c:3880
0x73eaf7 propagate_info_to_inlined_callees
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124
--- Comment #6 from Liu Hao ---
Today I got the same ICE when building mingw-w64. I am not clear why this error
only happened with GCC previously.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97568
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
The bug has been introduced by commit af66094d037793773eb8a49597866457f2f6a104.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97569
--- Comment #2 from Anders Granlund ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Anders Granlund from comment #0)
> > The interesting thing is that if we replace struct S with struct S {}
> > both compilers agree on reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574
Bug ID: 97574
Summary: Allow for nul output with Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97531
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't really care about test failures for non-standard configurations like
that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97563
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97572
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think GCC is correct to reject this. any(t) is not a valid constraint.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97569
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Anders Granlund from comment #0)
> The interesting thing is that if we replace struct S with struct S {}
> both compilers agree on rejecting the program.
I don't see any struct S in the ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97573
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Likewise, [depr.array.comp] should be implemented too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97573
Bug ID: 97573
Summary: Implement C++20 [depr.arith.conv.enum]
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97573
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95132
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
: candidate: ‘template requires Any
constexpr int f(auto:1)’
4 | constexpr static int f (Any auto) { return 42; };
| ^
bug-9.cpp:4:22: note: substitution of deduced template arguments resulted in
errors seen above
GCC version:
g++ (GCC) 11.0.0 20201025 (experimental)
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20201025 (experimental) [master revision
d7ddd287c:9f8172cd7:47d13acbda9a5d8eb57ff169ba74857cd54108e4] (GCC)
x86_64-unknown-linux
$ cat init.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97563
Damian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
Bug ID: 97570
Summary: avr-gcc: error: 'void* memalign' redeclared as
different kind of entity
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97569
Bug ID: 97569
Summary: Declaring a struct in a field declaration of another
struct.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97568
Bug ID: 97568
Summary: -fanalyzer assumes that an extern const pointer is
NULL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-25
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97530
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076
Bug 88076 depends on bug 97530, which changed state.
Bug 97530 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling coarray program with option
-fcoarray=shared (not with -fcoarray={lib,single})
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97530
Wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
Rimvydas (RJ) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88707
Rimvydas (RJ) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
--- Commen
version 11.0.0 20201025 (experimental) [master revision
1aeb7d7d67d:7a48d67add1:d7ddd287ca76e87f431f43687de6d8cc48e52543] (GCC)
[551] %
[551] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[552] %
[552] % gcctk -Os small.c
[553] % ./a.out
Illegal instruction
[554] %
[554] % cat small.c
int a, b, c, d;
void k
29 matches
Mail list logo
