[Bug bootstrap/97124] New: ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2020-09-19 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 Bug ID: 97124 Summary: ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/97123] New: double free detected in tcache 2 with recursive allocatable type

2020-09-19 Thread igor.gayday at mu dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97123 Bug ID: 97123 Summary: double free detected in tcache 2 with recursive allocatable type Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/97120] circular concept loops in

2020-09-19 Thread a...@cloudius-systems.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97120 --- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity --- This makes sense, according to my very limited ability to understand the standard. I reflected it to the clang bug here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47509.

[Bug fortran/97122] Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification part of a MODULE

2020-09-19 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-20 Ever confirmed|

[Bug fortran/97122] New: Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification part of a MODULE

2020-09-19 Thread ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
: .././src/configure --prefix=/home/MEGMS2/ian/usr/gcc-11.0.0 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --enable-libgomp --enable-checking=release --disable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 11.0.0 20200919 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v

[Bug tree-optimization/82608] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds VLA index

2020-09-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Despite the enhancement the test case in comment #0 is still not diagnosed (the n argument has no range).

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

2020-09-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 84051, which changed state. Bug 84051 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/84051] [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer

2020-09-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|9.0

[Bug c/67793] Missing warning for C99 static array dimension mismatch

2020-09-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/50584] No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator

2020-09-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/67793] Missing warning for C99 static array dimension mismatch

2020-09-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793 Bug 67793 depends on bug 50584, which changed state. Bug 50584 Summary: No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/94195] missing warning reading a smaller object via an lvalue of a larger type

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94195 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca Author: Martin Sebor Date: Sat

[Bug tree-optimization/82608] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds VLA index

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca Author: Martin Sebor Date: Sat

[Bug c/50584] No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baad4c48a85a354d2bf1b17e5aff71203c08adea commit r11-3305-gbaad4c48a85a354d2bf1b17e5aff71203c08adea Author: Martin Sebor Date: Sat

[Bug middle-end/84051] [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca Author: Martin Sebor Date: Sat

[Bug c/50584] No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca Author: Martin Sebor Date: Sat

[Bug c/50584] No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 commit r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Sat

[Bug libstdc++/97120] circular concept loops in

2020-09-19 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97120 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC ---

[Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4

2020-09-19 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337 --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka --- > OK, will do, but, at least superficially, our situation seems very similar to > this one, so I thought it would be better to keep this one going. But, again, > I'll open the new one as soon as I can make a t

[Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4

2020-09-19 Thread vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337 --- Comment #19 from Vadim Zeitlin --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #18) > We need a reproducer to fix bugs. Yes, of course, I understand this. I just didn't have time to make one yet, we've literally discovered the issue only today (we

[Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4

2020-09-19 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka --- > I've just subscribed to this bug because we see bug slow downs in our project > when switching from 8.3 to 10.2 (89% slower in an important use case, 30% > slowdown more or less across the board), without an

[Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4

2020-09-19 Thread vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337 --- Comment #17 from Vadim Zeitlin --- I've just subscribed to this bug because we see bug slow downs in our project when switching from 8.3 to 10.2 (89% slower in an important use case, 30% slowdown more or less across the board), without any ot

[Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4

2020-09-19 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97121] New: ICE (segfault) on incorrect default three-way comparison declaration

2020-09-19 Thread warp at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97121 Bug ID: 97121 Summary: ICE (segfault) on incorrect default three-way comparison declaration Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/89067] Inaccurate error message: 'i' at (1) is not a member of the 'x' structure

2020-09-19 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89067 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

2020-09-19 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 Bug 85836 depends on bug 97036, which changed state. Bug 97036 Summary: [F2018] ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE subprogram prefix combination rejected https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/97036] [F2018] ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE subprogram prefix combination rejected

2020-09-19 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/97036] [F2018] ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE subprogram prefix combination rejected

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7d2d4be7650acceb9d39327e21ee04f640c152f commit r11-3298-gf7d2d4be7650acceb9d39327e21ee04f640c152f Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Sa

[Bug fortran/93423] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure

2020-09-19 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/93423] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698 commit r8-10521-ge0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698 Author: Tobias Burnus D

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698 commit r8-10521-ge0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698 Author: Tobias Burnus D

[Bug fortran/93423] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aef149efb6d3fc97a38c74f7022124a6ba247746 commit r8-10520-gaef149efb6d3fc97a38c74f7022124a6ba247746 Author: Harald Anlauf D

[Bug fortran/93423] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769 commit r9-8921-g0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769 Author: Tobias Burnus Da

[Bug fortran/93423] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ec4a3d307210b5c62e9718eff4a32b058e14c78 commit r9-8920-g5ec4a3d307210b5c62e9718eff4a32b058e14c78 Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769 commit r9-8921-g0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769 Author: Tobias Burnus Da

[Bug other/97076] clang-format file does not work for some C++11 code

2020-09-19 Thread dmjpp at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97076 Dimitrij Mijoski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96861] Integer min/max optimization failed under -march=skylake-avx512

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c66c004ad610f4f02d5f065fe29c4c10f05ae13f commit r11-3297-gc66c004ad610f4f02d5f065fe29c4c10f05ae13f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Sep 19 09:

[Bug target/96789] x264: sub4x4_dct() improves when vectorization is disabled

2020-09-19 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789 --- Comment #16 from Hongtao.liu --- I notice 0x5561dc0 _36 * 2 1 times scalar_stmt costs 16 in body 0x5561dc0 _38 * 2 1 times scalar_stmt costs 16 in body 0x5562df0 _36 * 2 1 times vector_stmt costs 16 in body 0x5562df0 _38 * 2 1 times vector_s

[Bug libstdc++/97120] New: circular concept loops in

2020-09-19 Thread a...@cloudius-systems.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97120 Bug ID: 97120 Summary: circular concept loops in Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ A

[Bug c++/97051] Evaluating is_constant_evaluated in requires clause fails

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97051 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea470d09155f2007bdd502c16614128cb6f9348 commit r11-3295-gdea470d09155f2007bdd502c16614128cb6f9348 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sa

[Bug c++/97103] [10/11 Regression] ICE on nested requires expression template template instantiation

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97103 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2 commit r11-3296-ge5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sa

[Bug c++/96531] [10/11 Regression] ICE for concepts here.

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96531 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2 commit r11-3296-ge5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sa

[Bug target/96861] Integer min/max optimization failed under -march=skylake-avx512

2020-09-19 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/96861] Integer min/max optimization failed under -march=skylake-avx512

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83858ba1db31cd83667592a41d71315090459da4 commit r11-3294-g83858ba1db31cd83667592a41d71315090459da4 Author: liuhongt Date: Wed Sep 1