https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dinuxbg at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037
Bug ID: 97037
Summary: ICE on user-defined derived-type output of an
intermediate ancestor type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036
Bug ID: 97036
Summary: [F2018] ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE subprogram prefix
combination rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97029
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97002
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97002
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:707e9159ed25d19c174e4da18b194e530878d450
commit r11-3178-g707e9159ed25d19c174e4da18b194e530878d450
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sat Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97021
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97033
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
I wonder if it would be worthwhile to fold calls to std::move and std::forward
altogether in the frontend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97035
Bug ID: 97035
Summary: csky-linux-gnuabiv2 won't build with binutils master
branch
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
Bug ID: 97034
Summary: ICE on C++20 code: gcc_assert failure in return type
deduction (gcc/cp/pt.c:26984 in
type_dependent_expression_p(tree_node*))
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97033
Bug ID: 97033
Summary: g++ hangs on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49212
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49212&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, eliminating the bogus deprecated "esp" clobber makes it compile
correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
Bug ID: 97032
Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid use
of register 'frame' since r8-1911
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97030
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> ATM, we have the following in the nvptx.c source code:
> ...
> #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG 1
> #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG_2 1
> #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG_3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031
Bug ID: 97031
Summary: the content of a comment line breaks compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97030
Bug ID: 97030
Summary: [nvptx] Need strategy for nvidia JIT bug workarounds
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Com
22 matches
Mail list logo