[Bug target/96536] -fcf-protection code in i386.md:restore_stack_nonlocal uses invalid compare-and-jump rtl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > Created attachment 49060 [details] > Proposed patch > > Attached patch completely rewrites restore_stack_nonlocal expander. > > Can someone please test the patch on

[Bug analyzer/96611] New: ICE in get_or_create_cluster

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611 Bug ID: 96611 Summary: ICE in get_or_create_cluster Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug c/96606] Shift operator not working correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96606 RyuaNerin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/96609] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/init.c has many failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug analyzer/93994] ICE in get_or_create_mem_ref, at analyzer/region-model.cc:6599

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93994 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- It is likely a duplicate of PR95152.

[Bug analyzer/93388] ensure -fanalyzer works with our C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388 --- Comment #17 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #16) > I had another look at this and considerable progress has been made. > Only six ices left for the C code in the test suite. These are After the recent analyz

[Bug c/96610] ICE: in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at gimplify.c:15150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96610 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] ICE: in |ICE: in |gimplify_va_a

[Bug c/96610] New: [11 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at gimplify.c:15150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96610 Bug ID: 96610 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at gimplify.c:15150 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96592] Tuple element w/ member reference to incomplete template type rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96592 John changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnilacqua at hotmail dot com --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug analyzer/96598] false NULL argument warning [-Wanalyzer-null-argument]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/96598] false NULL argument warning [-Wanalyzer-null-argument]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ec32ddf822887cddc8910ed30dc105890def4ee commit r11-2695-g2ec32ddf822887cddc8910ed30dc105890def4ee Author: David Malcolm Date: Th

[Bug testsuite/96609] New: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/init.c has many failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609 Bug ID: 96609 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/init.c has many failures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug analyzer/96608] New: Build failure due to cast to type long on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608 Bug ID: 96608 Summary: Build failure due to cast to type long on MinGW Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: an

[Bug libstdc++/54185] [4.7/4.8 Regression] condition_variable not properly destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54185 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #14) > I have problems with the test case for this bug > (libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc) failing > randomly. It fails reliably on AIX

[Bug libstdc++/54185] [4.7/4.8 Regression] condition_variable not properly destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54185 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gmail dot com --- Comment #14 fr

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 --- Comment #6 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks - I will rerun the static analyzer on the codebase that previously crashed the static analyzer and report back.

[Bug target/96536] -fcf-protection code in i386.md:restore_stack_nonlocal uses invalid compare-and-jump rtl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com Last rec

[Bug target/96607] New: GCC feeds SPARC/Solaris linker with unrecognized TLS sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96607 Bug ID: 96607 Summary: GCC feeds SPARC/Solaris linker with unrecognized TLS sequences Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/96606] Shift operator not working correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96606 --- Comment #1 from RyuaNerin --- Created attachment 49059 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49059&action=edit msvc vs gcc

[Bug c/96606] New: Shift operator not working correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96606 Bug ID: 96606 Summary: Shift operator not working correctly Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug analyzer/96598] false NULL argument warning [-Wanalyzer-null-argument]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/95240] calloc() false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95240 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/95042] ICE in can_merge_p, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2053

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95042 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/96605] New: ICE on C++20 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96605 Bug ID: 96605 Summary: ICE on C++20 code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassign

[Bug analyzer/95026] "leak of FILE" false positive [CWE-775] [-Wanalyzer-file-leak]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95026 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94858] False report of memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94858 Bug 94858 depends on bug 94839, which changed state. Bug 94839 Summary: False positive with -fanalyzer and direct field assignment from calloc https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94839 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug analyzer/94839] False positive with -fanalyzer and direct field assignment from calloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94839 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/94689] arrays of functions are not meaningful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94688] ICE caused by analyzer since r10-7502-ga96f1c38a787fbc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94688 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94503] ICE on C++ return-value-optimization (in saved_diagnostic, at analyzer/diagnostic-manager.cc:84)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94503 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94640] false-positive leaking FILE pointer assigned to function passed pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94640 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/94839] False positive with -fanalyzer and direct field assignment from calloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94839 Bug 94839 depends on bug 94640, which changed state. Bug 94640 Summary: false-positive leaking FILE pointer assigned to function passed pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94640 What|Removed |A

[Bug analyzer/94458] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning a heap-allocated struct by value holding a heap-allocated pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94458 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94399] analyzer reports false positives for stuff freed using __attribute__((cleanup()))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94399 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug analyzer/94011] ICE in validate, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3727

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94011 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/93938] ICE in validate, at analyzer/region-model.cc:231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93938 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/93032] analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93032 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/96603] Failure to optimize memcmp out for more than one byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96603 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/12086] memcmp(i,j,4) should use word (SI) subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/96603] Failure to optimize memcmp out for more than one byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96603 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/96601] Failure to optimize equality comparison involving strstr to strlen+strncmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96601 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||83819 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/96506] ICE when using an MMA type as a function param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96506 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ad7e730c142ef6cd0ddc1491a89a7f330caa887 commit r11-2692-g0ad7e730c142ef6cd0ddc1491a89a7f330caa887 Author: Peter Bergner Date: Th

[Bug c++/96604] rejects-valid on befriending specialization of conversion function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96604 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/96604] New: rejects-valid on befriending specialization of conversion function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96604 Bug ID: 96604 Summary: rejects-valid on befriending specialization of conversion function template Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c/96571] Bad "set but not used" warning with _Generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96571 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/93529] Implement P1009R2, Array size deduction in new-expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||88323 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/95599] [coroutines] destructor for temporary operand to co_yield expression called before end of full-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95599 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||max at duempel dot org --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/95491] coroutines: awaited temporaries are never destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95491 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug lto/95548] ice in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:7321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95548 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa81d093bf26a263131ecc1add04e27274457bb9 commit r10-8625-gaa81d093bf26a263131ecc1add04e27274457bb9 Author: Jan Hubicka Date:

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/96603] New: Failure to optimize memcmp out for more than one byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96603 Bug ID: 96603 Summary: Failure to optimize memcmp out for more than one byte Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/96599] Failure to optimize self-stpcpy to strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96599 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13 CC|

[Bug ipa/96482] [10 Regression] Combination of -finline-small-functions and ipa-cp optimisations causes incorrect values being passed to a function since r279523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a2371497e9bed64aa4f46169127f3ea8e32e726 commit r10-8618-g4a2371497e9bed64aa4f46169127f3ea8e32e726 Author: Martin Liska Da

[Bug fortran/93671] gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e00464a5cb4214f5a5de4535de4f684a86aa10d5 commit r11-2689-ge00464a5cb4214f5a5de4535de4f684a86aa10d5 Author: Andre Vehreschild Da

[Bug c++/96602] New: Partial ordering is ambiguous with default function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96602 Bug ID: 96602 Summary: Partial ordering is ambiguous with default function arguments Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/96479] AArch64: return SIMD register with -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96479 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13 Sta

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually, I think this is a glibc bug rather than gcc, because the values computed at compile time look right, rather than those at runtime. Consider: int e = 69; int main() { long double a = -__builtin_lde

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 49056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49056&action=edit C source code Reduced code attached.

[Bug target/90933] [nvptx] internal compiler error: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'reg' in rtx_to_poly_int64, at rtl.h:2367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90933 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- New behaviour for the test-case. Instead of ICE-ing, we have: ... /home/vries/nvptx/mainkernel-2/source-gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/memcmp-1.c: In function 'test_strncmp_49_1':^M /home/vries/nvptx/mainkernel-2/s

[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.4 |11.0

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Printing the numbers in detail (for all of them the long double and the two double portions after that)): a -0x1.f1d5d27f89914ab924b2cd0995p+69 -0x1.f1d5d27f89915000p+69 0x1.51b6d34cbd9ac000p+15 b -0x

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- I should be more precise. Take this test case: int e = 69; int main() { __ibm128 a = -__builtin_ldexpl( 1.9446689187403240306919491832695730985733566864714824565497322973045558e+00l, e); __i

[Bug tree-optimization/96601] New: Failure to optimize equality comparison involving strstr to strlen+strncmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96601 Bug ID: 96601 Summary: Failure to optimize equality comparison involving strstr to strlen+strncmp Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- The runtime modf actually returns a large number. This is not about precision but about completely bogus values. You can adjust the testcase to: int e = 69;

[Bug target/96600] __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/96589] Directive to redirect compiler output to /dev/null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96589 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- With this patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-21.c index 7e0f85ffdf3..87058988780 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-s

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug c++/96387] gnu gmp c source edit g++ internal compiler error appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug target/96600] New: __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600 Bug ID: 96600 Summary: __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Code seems ok on date 20200724, so someone has broken something recently.

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Reduced command line: /home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/ -O2 -c Interestingly, -O3 not required. I'll have a look at previous versions of gcc then have a go at reducing the c

[Bug ipa/96482] [10 Regression] Combination of -finline-small-functions and ipa-cp optimisations causes incorrect values being passed to a function since r279523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f91770216eade83f068528c1e4f00e2ac3b23044 commit r11-2686-gf91770216eade83f068528c1e4f00e2ac3b23044 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 49055 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49055&action=edit gzipped C source code This attached file is preprocessed from libgcc/libgcov-driver.c. This line is required

[Bug tree-optimization/96599] New: Failure to optimize self-stpcpy to strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96599 Bug ID: 96599 Summary: Failure to optimize self-stpcpy to strlen Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opt

[Bug c++/96387] gnu gmp c source edit g++ internal compiler error appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387 cents2823 at yahoo dot co.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|W

[Bug c/96597] valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96595] docs: typos in gfortran -fallow-argument-mismatch invoke description

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96595 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/96595] docs: typos in gfortran -fallow-argument-mismatch invoke description

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96595 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b5490f5d1633fedf20e6eba87153c5963c61368 commit r11-2685-g2b5490f5d1633fedf20e6eba87153c5963c61368 Author: Matthew Krupcale Date:

[Bug c/96598] New: false NULL argument warning [-Wanalyzer-null-argument]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598 Bug ID: 96598 Summary: false NULL argument warning [-Wanalyzer-null-argument] Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c/96597] New: valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597 Bug ID: 96597 Summary: valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo