https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ba192b5b7d2509b833f288000f21d6294420ace
commit r10-8466-g1ba192b5b7d2509b833f288000f21d6294420ace
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Apparently we've got a patch in queue that does something similar:
>
> +fprofile-prefix-path=
> +Common·Joined·RejectNegative·Var(profile_prefix_path)
> +remove·p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96173
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The code is all located in libgcc/config/libbid/bid_binarydecimal.c
>
> It looks to be precalulated tables which increase the size.
That is the code size is sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96173
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |libgcc
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96173
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
IMHO, the implementation is highly inefficient. Even with all these functions
(which are similar, thus should share most code), 3 MB seems a lot to me.
In particular, some user complained that the size of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96173
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Keno Fischer from comment #8)
> Is there a list of all the things that need doing? I don't know very much
> about how GCC is architected (but am familiar with LLVM,MachO,Aarch64 ISA,
> etc), but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96173
Bug ID: 96173
Summary: double to _Decimal64 or _Decimal128 conversion with
BID generates 3 MB of code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Keno Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keno at juliacomputing dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94408
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #7 from Claudia Pellegrino ---
Thanks Eric, and thank you Iain for the ballpark estimate.
Just to add a piece of data to get a better idea of the work involved, here’s a
link to a document published by Apple. It specifies how their A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96172
Bug ID: 96172
Summary: Failure to optimize direct assignment to bitfield
through shifts
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.1.0 |11.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96171
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96171
Bug ID: 96171
Summary: ICE on invalid VLA argument declaration and attribute
access
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96170
Bug ID: 96170
Summary: Enhancement: allow requires-clause checking of
statement expression substitution success or failure
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95998
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Is static in C/C++ equivalent of SAVE in fortran (at least in the context of
> gfc_typename)?
Yes.
> If yes, AFAIU the code the odd access to gfc_typenam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96169
Bug ID: 96169
Summary: Don't provide internal lambda names in diagnostics?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||37336
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
... and thanks for the timely bug report!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90efb2512d40f0a59b063aa0416a6d28849ee424
commit r11-2036-g90efb2512d40f0a59b063aa0416a6d28849ee424
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #4 from Claudia Pellegrino ---
Thanks Andrew for the feedback. I wasn’t sure whether or not that has been done
already.
Even though I’m unable to do it on my own: if anyone wants to give it a try,
I’m happy to help out with testing a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96136
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Someone will need to take the llvm port and then port the full ABI to gcc. This
is not just as simple of what you did.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #1 from Claudia Pellegrino ---
For those who want to run the shell script out of the box without any
modifications, the following requirements apply:
- You’re on Apple Silicon hardware.
- You’re running macOS 11.0 Beta 1 or newer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Bug ID: 96168
Summary: Cannot bootstrap with Xcode 12 Beta on aarch64, macOS
11.0/Darwin, Apple Silicon
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96167
Bug ID: 96167
Summary: fails to detect ROL pattern in simple case, but
succeeds when operand goes through memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
Bug ID: 96166
Summary: [10/11 Regression] -O3/-ftree-slp-vectorize turns ROL
into a mess
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpalus+gcc at fastmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96165
Bug ID: 96165
Summary: internal compiler error during IPA pass: fnsummary
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Two things: We should not warn about INTENT mismatches when
we artificially generate the prototypes, and we should set a
valid gfc_locus.
Both done with the attached patch.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/fronten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:505032d97d0593d5e9a6f51b107650e27fcf6b23
commit r11-2034-g505032d97d0593d5e9a6f51b107650e27fcf6b23
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700
--- Comment #12 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
I managed to bootstrap and regtest upstream commit 6e41c27bf549 on gcc113 farm
machine.
Two questions:
- What is your system compiler version? For GCC 11, C++11 compiler is required:
https://gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
What we have here is, in gfc_check_externals0,
(gdb) call debug(def_sym->formal)
|| symbol: '_formal_0'
type spec : (INTEGER 4)
attributes: (VARIABLE ARTIFICIAL DUMMY)
|| symbol: '_formal_1'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #5 from Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164
--- Comment #1 from kaba ---
The error is "use of function 'void A::g() requires N == 3 [with int N =
2]' with unsatisfied constraints"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164
Bug ID: 96164
Summary: Constraints and explicit template instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96158
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> I won't comment on the questionable programming idiom of placing
> a common block in a module, which kind of defeats the niceties of
> a module.
If somebody wants to tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
The first part has now been fixed with the fix for PR 27318,
r11-1814-gcc9a9229285a26ac12bc8de53237ce9c4d42f867 .
The second test case, where interfaces are checked vs. interfaces,
subroutine sub_1()
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96163
Bug ID: 96163
Summary: another ice in pass slp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
48 matches
Mail list logo
