https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #36 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #35)
> Btw. can you run the failing compilation in gdb and list where exactly it
> fails (which option name is different)?
Shown previous runs indicate the first tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #35 from Martin Liška ---
Btw. can you run the failing compilation in gdb and list where exactly it fails
(which option name is different)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #34 from Martin Liška ---
I don't have to do anything special in order to get pre-processed source file:
$ gcc pr88876.c -freport-bug
pr88876.c:10:1: internal compiler error: ‘global_options’ are modified in local
context
10 | in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95804
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95828
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054604.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95887
Bug ID: 95887
Summary: suboptimal memcmp with embedded zero bytes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
The following is a more straightforward test case that's also miscompiled to
return zero:
int main ()
{
char a[] = "\0abc";
return __builtin_memcmp (a, "\0\0\0\0", 4);
}
main:
.LFB0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95828
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
Bug ID: 95886
Summary: suboptimal memcpy with embedded zero bytes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94954
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Will Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58b475a2233630b1737bbdab986f08510d62cd3a
commit r11-1643-g58b475a2233630b1737bbdab986f08510d62cd3a
Author: Will Schmidt
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #33 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #32)
> Thank you very much. I'll wait for a test-case by you ;)
I have had a go, but I cannot generate an intermediate file.
I've tried various ways to get options-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95510
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #10)
> Hi Vlad,
>
> Just curious if you had a chance to think about an approach to this that
> would be acceptable.
Sorry for not working on this issue more a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3d976ae009b873596b47961869b7cdfc41d7e67
commit r9-8696-ge3d976ae009b873596b47961869b7cdfc41d7e67
Author: Harald Anlauf
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1edfe597d9157b8b9b61c4677b38730a9a59936
commit r8-10327-ge1edfe597d9157b8b9b61c4677b38730a9a59936
Author: Harald Anlauf
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef6506e23691a72e1e724977e8ee8b9f3db74015
commit r11-1642-gef6506e23691a72e1e724977e8ee8b9f3db74015
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef6506e23691a72e1e724977e8ee8b9f3db74015
commit r11-1642-gef6506e23691a72e1e724977e8ee8b9f3db74015
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95672
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95672
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11a751ff77fba92de77b099ec5e1896d3a99d482
commit r11-1641-g11a751ff77fba92de77b099ec5e1896d3a99d482
Author: Nicholas Krause
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95813
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e5da6a02fec8aa84bb00966282f420cb70fe4f0
commit r11-1640-g1e5da6a02fec8aa84bb00966282f420cb70fe4f0
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95518
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e5da6a02fec8aa84bb00966282f420cb70fe4f0
commit r11-1640-g1e5da6a02fec8aa84bb00966282f420cb70fe4f0
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:554eb7d2e1ef5660d6a8e1c12ee1d751a70bbf31
commit r10-8363-g554eb7d2e1ef5660d6a8e1c12ee1d751a70bbf31
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95885
Bug ID: 95885
Summary: LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT macro documentation is incorrect.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d6baf68fe22b6ef5b1d6fabbef97c0e1b4d7abf
commit r11-1637-g7d6baf68fe22b6ef5b1d6fabbef97c0e1b4d7abf
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
Bug ID: 95883
Summary: Attributes on lambdas appear to be parsed in the wrong
place
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
now, if it is from the board config file, maybe it had better be moved to
ldflags or libs; both of them undergo some -Wl, treatment of object files and
libs already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In case that's from some board config file, I suggest prefixing it with -Wl, so
that it doesn't count as an additional input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
that's because of the second input gcc_tg.o
can you tell where that comes from?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95827
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a16d0924f18046704ef9a4b6d9593718594677f1
commit r11-1634-ga16d0924f18046704ef9a4b6d9593718594677f1
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
Bug ID: 95882
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2729
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95881
Bug ID: 95881
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at
fortran/resolve.c:15175
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
Bug ID: 95880
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_type, at
fortran/symbol.c:2030
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879
Bug ID: 95879
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2729
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95878
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Another test:
struct istream_iterator {
istream_iterator() {}
istream_iterator(const istream_iterator&) {}
};
istream_iterator next(istream_iterator&& bound) {
return static_cast(bou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boris.staletic at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #0)
> g:84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8, r9-8693
>
> This same error occurs on both gcc 8 and 9. Bad backport maybe?
I do not get this error on x8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95878
Bug ID: 95878
Summary: ICE when compiling code that mixes an empty class,
[[no_unique_address]] and non-trivial default and copy
constructors
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89310
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Maybe you can make a define_insn_and_split for the lshrdi3 plus this?
Which will split to an insn fewer immediately.
If you split after reload you need many extra patterns to get the most
basic optimisa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67311
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch – without one recursively checks the same type.
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c
@@ -330,6 +330,11 @@ gfc_has_alloc_comps (tree type, tree decl)
return false;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95866
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c78907d514d65483c7ddfb4cb1f5c57f23da73d9
commit r11-1633-gc78907d514d65483c7ddfb4cb1f5c57f23da73d9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
Bug ID: 95877
Summary: gfortran.dg/pr95689.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced, but invalid:
template class a {
public:
a();
int b = [] { enum E {}; };
};
class c : a {
c();
};
template a::a() = default;
c::c() {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like it started with r251433.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Hit this when reducing something:
template class a b[]()->int
So it'd be nice to fix it to alleviate problems when reducing C++ code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95853
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88752
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78906
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95876
Bug ID: 95876
Summary: Error in compiling gcc-11-20200621 with gcc-10 without
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95875
Bug ID: 95875
Summary: Misleading error message "invalid use of incomplete
type"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95874
Bug ID: 95874
Summary: CLWB isn't supported on Icelake client
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OK, with some pending patch applied and
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
index ca6bedc9cc8..3d5de39383c 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
@@ -3130,7 +3130,7 @
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95873
Bug ID: 95873
Summary: Duplicated warning message "'class' tag used in naming
'union a'"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95872
Bug ID: 95872
Summary: Duplicated warning message in "-Wlogical-op"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95871
Bug ID: 95871
Summary: Duplicated error message : "the value is not usable in
a constant expression"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: di
ocessed cource code)
I can reproduce this bug with the following gcc versions:
9.3.0
10.1.0
11.0.0 20200624 (experimental) [this was built with revision eb0ff770e29 from
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git, which was the tip of the master branch on 24th
of June, 2020]
The bug does not happen with:
7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95869
Bug ID: 95869
Summary: ICE when "target parallel" construct used with "if"
clause in Fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:134f7c941929b3d099322a89928c04e5ac69267e
commit r11-1631-g134f7c941929b3d099322a89928c04e5ac69267e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jun 12 16:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95774
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter ---
ps here's the compiler explorer link for the preprocessed test.
https://godbolt.org/z/zDw5JQ
I tried manually reducing it, but couldn't easily get below the 1000kib limit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff5c8fe44a98025c1e700cfc033247965e293869
commit r10-8360-gff5c8fe44a98025c1e700cfc033247965e293869
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95774
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:403e166b974f53982d78efdd70938d05b6983b2a
commit r11-1630-g403e166b974f53982d78efdd70938d05b6983b2a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jun 19 21:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
What I find interesting is a similar case with the division instead of the
addition. Clang compiles it to:
divps %xmm1, %xmm0
retq
Considering that we have [a0, a1, 0, 0] / [b0, b1, 0, 0], t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c35d16a3925958b3a22426de0cb8e04f654b6dd
commit r11-1629-g6c35d16a3925958b3a22426de0cb8e04f654b6dd
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jun 24 04:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Created attachment 48779
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48779&action=edit
Preprocessed source x86 (32bit)
Here's preprocessed source for x86 (32 bit). This shows the same behavior as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's done through POWI internally, I guess we could open the internal function
to also operate on integers...
As for overflow for a multiplication chain of the same operand there shouldn't
be any issue, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Corallo ---
"aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
> akrl, any clue as to where this .out is coming from in your runs? I get .exe
> in my arm test runs; I don't see anything th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I'm aware of these issues.
I fixed all the test failures that were definitely bugs in the HSACOv3
implementation, and the ones that remain appear to be either latent bugs
uncovered by the new driver configur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1890f2f0e210ef515c39728c54151372d36dd187
commit r11-1627-g1890f2f0e210ef515c39728c54151372d36dd187
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon May 18 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95868
Bug ID: 95868
Summary: Derived-type deferred-length character component
handling broken
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
PS : Of course this can be optimized in the general case, I was only giving an
example here, I wouldn't want only the pattern of 653 successive
multiplications to be optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Bug ID: 95867
Summary: Failure to optimize successive multiplications of
___uint128_t
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95866
Bug ID: 95866
Summary: vectorized shift with scalar argument not correctly
costed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117
fsmoke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fsmoke at mail dot ru
--- Comment #4 from fsmok
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
