[Bug tree-optimization/95854] ICE in find_bswap_or_nop_1 of pass store-merging

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95854 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug gcov-profile/95847] [9/10/11 Regression] Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files with --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Summary|Internal error w

[Bug tree-optimization/95845] Failure to optimize vector load made in separate operations to single load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95845 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > I see the test-cases fixed. > Can you still reproduce that? r11-1553 PASS x_1.i for me and FAIL unreduced one. r11-1582 PASS x_1.i, x_2.i for me and PASS un

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Alexandre

[Bug target/95843] Duplicated ISA info in driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-24 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/95855] New: A missing ifcvt optimization to generate fcsel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95855 Bug ID: 95855 Summary: A missing ifcvt optimization to generate fcsel Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug middle-end/64242] Longjmp expansion incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com --- Comment #40

[Bug tree-optimization/95854] New: ICE in find_bswap_or_nop_1 of pass store-merging

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95854 Bug ID: 95854 Summary: ICE in find_bswap_or_nop_1 of pass store-merging Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 93976, which changed state. Bug 93976 Summary: Implement P2082R1, Fixing CTAD for aggregates https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93976 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/95719] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/93976] Implement P2082R1, Fixing CTAD for aggregates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93976 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/95775] Command line argument for target_clones?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95775 --- Comment #4 from Yichao Yu --- > Hey. My opinion is similar to Richi's. If you really want a highly optimized > library, you should rather use a dlopen mechanism with pre-built set of > options. Well, a few things, 1. That sounds like an a

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Language Lawyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||language.lawyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/95637] Read-only data assigned to `.sdata' rather than `.rodata'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95637 --- Comment #4 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Sigh, I keep forgetting we don't have PC-relative memory access machine instructions. We could have had base=x0 encodings allocated for that, which are otherwise of rather limited use. Regardless, I thi

[Bug target/95842] arch_names_table and processor_alias_table should be combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug tree-optimization/95853] New: Failure to optimize add overflow pattern to __builtin_add_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95853 Bug ID: 95853 Summary: Failure to optimize add overflow pattern to __builtin_add_overflow Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95852] New: Failure to optimize __builtin_mul_overflow pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95852 Bug ID: 95852 Summary: Failure to optimize __builtin_mul_overflow pattern Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/93976] Implement P2082R1, Fixing CTAD for aggregates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93976 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b161257f9f8c7a26b7d119ebc32cbbc54d2e508 commit r11-1615-g6b161257f9f8c7a26b7d119ebc32cbbc54d2e508 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mo

[Bug libstdc++/95851] [10/11 Regression] std::to_chars(p, p, c, 2) segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/95851] New: [10/11 Regression] std::to_chars(p, p, c, 2) segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851 Bug ID: 95851 Summary: [10/11 Regression] std::to_chars(p, p, c, 2) segfault Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/95850] [11 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails starting with r11-r11-1595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95850 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/95846] Combination of LTO and -Wl, --defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reported to binutils bugzilla: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163

[Bug fortran/95850] New: [11 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails starting with r11-r11-1595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95850 Bug ID: 95850 Summary: [11 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails starting with r11-r11-1595 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Statu

[Bug c++/95849] New: Universal forwarding constructor inheritance resolution issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95849 Bug ID: 95849 Summary: Universal forwarding constructor inheritance resolution issue Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|wrong-co

[Bug fortran/95827] ICE in gfc_get_string, at fortran/iresolve.c:70

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95827 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054583.html

[Bug fortran/95826] ICE in gfc_match_decl_type_spec, at fortran/decl.c:4290

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95826 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054582.html

[Bug gcov-profile/95847] Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files with --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89976] missing uninitialized warning for uninitialized struct member (VOPs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976 Bug 89976 depends on bug 49754, which changed state. Bug 49754 Summary: Wuninitialized does not work with structs/unions/arrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/49754] Wuninitialized does not work with structs/unions/arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See A

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 49754, which changed state. Bug 49754 Summary: Wuninitialized does not work with structs/unions/arrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Bug ID: 95848 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: m

[Bug fortran/95707] ICE in finish_equivalences, at fortran/trans-common.c:1319

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95707 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/95688] ICE in gfc_get_string, at fortran/iresolve.c:70

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95688 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/95687] ICE in get_unique_hashed_string, at fortran/class.c:508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95687 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/95689] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces, at fortran/interface.c:2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/95689] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces, at fortran/interface.c:2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cfdae8e4a96912871865d289a5a817cec68eaa0 commit r8-10325-g4cfdae8e4a96912871865d289a5a817cec68eaa0 Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/95587] ICE in gfc_target_encode_expr, at fortran/target-memory.c:362

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/95689] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces, at fortran/interface.c:2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8 commit r9-8693-g84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8 Author: Harald Anlauf Dat

[Bug fortran/95587] ICE in gfc_target_encode_expr, at fortran/target-memory.c:362

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:449246af10befa7e973cd6f864138e6cdd5c24e5 commit r9-8692-g449246af10befa7e973cd6f864138e6cdd5c24e5 Author: Harald Anlauf Dat

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:862ea30fcb50735344f853e330ea58025fbe82d3 commit r10-8357-g862ea30fcb50735344f853e330ea58025fbe82d3 Author: Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f609029c7078fbd29e2f842074e2b99ea099096 commit r11-1614-g6f609029c7078fbd29e2f842074e2b99ea099096 Author: Thomas Koenig Date: Tue Jun 23 21:59:47 2020 +0200 Make forall stateme

[Bug fortran/95828] ICE in resolve_select_rank, at fortran/resolve.c:9774

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95828 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/95846] Combination of LTO and -Wl, --defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- I see the test-cases fixed. Can you still reproduce that?

[Bug c/95777] Allow specifying more than one target options at the same time in target and target_clones attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95777 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/95775] Command line argument for target_clones?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95775 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Hey. My opinion is similar to Richi's. If you really want a highly optimized library, you should rather use a dlopen mechanism with pre-built set of options.

[Bug middle-end/95830] [11 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug fortran/95847] New: Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files with --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847 Bug ID: 95847 Summary: Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files with --coverage Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail dot c

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > The problem seems more serious. > > > > type t > > character(len=:, kind=4), pointer :: str2 > > end t

[Bug c++/95477] [coroutines] coroutine result object not properly freed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95477 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:788b962aa00959e861b45767c5c88ec41ca30c21 commit r11-1613-g788b962aa00959e861b45767c5c88ec41ca30c21 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Tue

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- The test case is invalid, see https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054579.html

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug lto/95846] New: Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846 Bug ID: 95846 Summary: Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95836] Failure to remove strchr converted to bool with string literal when bit magic would be much more efficient (and sometimes smaller)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95836 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, it does, we can't keep it in the IL in that form because the compiler itself might optimize it away on the assumption that UB doesn't happen.

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Proposed fix at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548730.html Seems to work for me. Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/95836] Failure to remove strchr converted to bool with string literal when bit magic would be much more efficient (and sometimes smaller)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95836 --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier --- Yeah I wasn't sure whether this was legitimate, I was just trying to give a small example here, I dont think doesn't changes anything to how the optimization is able to work unless GCC has targets where `a <

[Bug tree-optimization/95845] New: Failure to optimize vector load made in separate operations to single load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95845 Bug ID: 95845 Summary: Failure to optimize vector load made in separate operations to single load Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/95629] consteval operator== crashes compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95629 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/95832] std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, that doesn't work for things convertible to pointers. #include struct P { operator void*() const; }; std::variant v{ P{} }; The argument type here is not a pointer, so your suggestion would construct

[Bug c++/95844] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_warn_deprecated_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95844 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/95844] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_warn_deprecated_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95844 Bug ID: 95844 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_warn_deprecated_use) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug target/95843] New: Duplicated ISA info in driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843 Bug ID: 95843 Summary: Duplicated ISA info in driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/95768] [11 Regression] -march=sandybridge -O2 -Wall crashes as 'during GIMPLE pass: uninit ... Segmentation fault'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95768 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug libstdc++/95832] std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832 --- Comment #7 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- > Not possible to backport to gcc-10, because the front end support isn't there. That unfortunately means std::variant construction works differently in each of gcc-9, gcc-10 and master. Doesn't the n

[Bug target/95676] [armhf] g++ mis-compiles code at -O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95676 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95839] Failure to optimize addition of vector elements to vector addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/95840] Parallel build fails due to missing "gcc/xgcc"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/95840] Parallel build fails due to missing "gcc/xgcc"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I think on trunk this has been fixed with g:b19d8aac15649f31a7588b2634411a1922906ea8 2020-06-03 Romain Naour * Makefile.in (SELFTEST_DEPS): Move before including language makefile fragme

[Bug target/95646] arm-none-eabi function attribute 'cmse_nonsecure_entry' wipes register values with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95646 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f426554fd804d65509875d706d8b8bc3a48393b commit r11-1601-g5f426554fd804d65509875d706d8b8bc3a48393b Author: Andre Simoes D

[Bug target/95842] arch_names_table and processor_alias_table should be combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/95842] New: arch_names_table and processor_alias_table should be combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842 Bug ID: 95842 Summary: arch_names_table and processor_alias_table should be combined Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug testsuite/95416] Several gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #5) > but is .dSYM ever generated when no -g is present? If it was that would e an error, so correctly would cause the test to fail. That's why I was doing: if {[s

[Bug rtl-optimization/95493] [10 Regression] test for vector members apparently reordered with assignment to vector members since r10-7523-gb90061c6ec090c6b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.1 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95690] [11 Regression] ICE in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos, at emit-rtl.c:2092

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95690 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4 commit r10-8355-g7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug rtl-optimization/95493] [10 Regression] test for vector members apparently reordered with assignment to vector members since r10-7523-gb90061c6ec090c6b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4 commit r10-8355-g7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e4d807085a1cfd68ae79cb1abbe15114964a921 commit r10-8354-g2e4d807085a1cfd68ae79cb1abbe15114964a921 Author: Thomas Koenig

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- but is .dSYM ever generated when no -g is present?

[Bug debug/95841] New: Bad location expression for TLS variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95841 Bug ID: 95841 Summary: Bad location expression for TLS variable Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug testsuite/95840] New: Parallel build fails due to missing "gcc/xgcc"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840 Bug ID: 95840 Summary: Parallel build fails due to missing "gcc/xgcc" Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: te

[Bug tree-optimization/95839] New: Failure to optimize addition of vector elements to vector addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839 Bug ID: 95839 Summary: Failure to optimize addition of vector elements to vector addition Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95838] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/95719] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c++/95719] [11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c++/95838] [10/11 Regression] ICE in (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Summary|[10 Regression]

[Bug c++/95838] [10 Regression] ICE in (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- also seen with 20200623: ../watchdog.ii: In member function ‘void g::e()’: ../watchdog.ii:20:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 20 | c() | ^ 0x12f56ac crash_signal

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #3) > Iain, > > Do platforms that use dsymutil support -gsplit-dwarf? None I am aware of - Darwin should reject -gsplit-dwarf with a diagnostic, so that configuration

[Bug c++/95838] New: [10 Regression] ICE in (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838 Bug ID: 95838 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in (Segmentation Fault) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/95835] Wrong line information at Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95835 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23 Component|debug

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95487] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid vector types in nop conversion) with -O3 -march=skylake-avx512 since r10-1052-gc29c92c789d93848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.1 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95308] [10 Regression] ICE: in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr with -O3 -march=skylake-avx512 since r10-4203-g97c146036750e7cb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95308 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.1 Status|ASSIGNED

  1   2   >