https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 24, 2020 3:59:35 AM GMT+01:00, "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043
>
>--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
>(In reply to Richard Biener f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-24
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94284
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> OK, so it's indeed vectorizable_live_operation not paying attention to
> loop-closed SSA form.
>
> What it should do before building the lane extract is create a _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94268
--- Comment #8 from fdlbxtqi ---
Well. These links are dead. Repost them.
https://bitbucket.org/ejsvifq_mabmip/fast_io/src/master/benchmarks/.10m_size_t/unit/filebuf_io_observer.cc
https://bitbucket.org/ejsvifq_mabmip/fast_io/src/master/bench
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > No, it diagnoses the main bug
>
> Nope, it does not. -Wchar-subscripts is designed and documented to diagnose
> a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75fb811dfaa29d60a897924b0d1629577b90eee7
commit r10-7346-g75fb811dfaa29d60a897924b0d1629577b90eee7
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Mar 23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94238
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94144
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75fb811dfaa29d60a897924b0d1629577b90eee7
commit r10-7346-g75fb811dfaa29d60a897924b0d1629577b90eee7
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Mar 23 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94238
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75fb811dfaa29d60a897924b0d1629577b90eee7
commit r10-7346-g75fb811dfaa29d60a897924b0d1629577b90eee7
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Mar 23 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> No, it diagnoses the main bug
Nope, it does not. -Wchar-subscripts is designed and documented to diagnose a
common cause of a bug. The actual bug itself (which,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295
Bug ID: 94295
Summary: use __builtin_operator_new and
__builtin_operator_delete when available
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Or just
void f(){
int*p=new int[1];
*p=42;
delete[] p;
}
while it does optimize for
void f(){
int*p=new int;
*p=42;
delete p;
}
because the front-end gives us a clobber before operator delete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
You should probably post that comment on the second, related, bug 94294 - which
is about the fact that GCC keeps the new and delete. This one is strictly about
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> Note: I suppose it's theoretically possible that this bug only manifests
> because bug 94293 prevents the allocated space from being recognized as
> unused; but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Note:
The bugs also manifest with this slightly simpler program:
#include
int bar() {
std::string second { "Hey... no small-string optimization for me please!"
};
return 123;
}
See: https://god
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
--- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Note:
The bugs also manifest with this simpler program:
#include
int bar() {
std::string second { "Hey... no small-string optimization for me please!"
};
return 123;
}
See: https://godbolt.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Adding
inline void* operator new(std::size_t n){return __builtin_malloc(n);}
inline void operator delete(void*p)noexcept{__builtin_free(p);}
inline void operator delete(void*p,std::size_t)noexcept{__builtin_fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
Bug ID: 94294
Summary: [missed optimization] new+delete of unused local
string not removed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293
Bug ID: 94293
Summary: [missed optimization] Useless statements populating
local string not removed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:29:02PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> I get an ICE even for the non-valgrind version on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
>
> gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93805
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] A |[8/9 Regression] A
|su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93805
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f6c1c82eb5001a844b5ac535f6aba4a3257031f
commit r10-7345-g1f6c1c82eb5001a844b5ac535f6aba4a3257031f
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase:
implicit none
integer :: i
if (any (BESSEL_YN(0, 10, 0.0) /= [ (BESSEL_YN(i, 0.0), i = 0, 10) ])) &
then
STOP 6
end if
if (any (abs (BESSEL_YN(0, 10, 1.0) &
- [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273
--- Comment #4 from Alexey Neyman ---
Or add a similar "return if debug level is terse" at the beginning of
`gen_type_die` - I didn't notice that in C++ it could also get called not
through the `add_type_attribute`:
```
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Created attachment 48093 [details]
> Patch candidate
>
> There's a patch candidate. Can you please test it?
The following seems to inject 'no' library:
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 48098 [details]
> gcc10-pr94286.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Thanks, it fixes the testcase for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-03-17 14:05:57 |2020-3-23
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c7bd28d1cb85c43c5d0f6d9ece953881cf99373
commit r9-8408-g5c7bd28d1cb85c43c5d0f6d9ece953881cf99373
Author: Will Schmidt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-03-23 1:37 p.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I don't see a define for __BIG_ENDIAN__.
It seems we need this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94238
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrea.corallo at arm dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94144
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
x-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r10-7327-20200323085706-g2fa4b1ffd6e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-pr94286-armv7a-hardfloat
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200323 (experimental) (GCC)
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r10-7327-20200323085706-g2fa4b1ffd6e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-pr94286-armv7a-hardfloat
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200323 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca6c722561ce9b9dc7b59cfd9d29c9b466732721
commit r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9dc7b59cfd9d29c9b466732721
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94290
Bug ID: 94290
Summary: [gfortran] OpenMP target teams distribute default
firstprivate causes failure to map back values from
device
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5db9e89323cd0a0be16a94f2f984121531ea7772
commit r10-7343-g5db9e89323cd0a0be16a94f2f984121531ea7772
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5db9e89323cd0a0be16a94f2f984121531ea7772
commit r10-7343-g5db9e89323cd0a0be16a94f2f984121531ea7772
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #11)
> Created attachment 48088 [details]
> Candidate patch
It fixes the build for me.
I am unable to find a way how to run the testsuite on a non-native system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12)
> That patch looks fine, thank you!
>
> Is there some way you can test if this works? Ideally in the testsuite
> of course, but that can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289
Bug ID: 94289
Summary: Assumed-rank array bounds resuscitate on the second
call
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin ---
On hppa-linux, we have:
#define __BIG_ENDIAN4321
/* hppa1.1 big-endian. */
#ifndef _ENDIAN_H
# error "Never use directly; include instead."
#endif
#define __BYTE_ORDER __BIG_ENDIAN
I don't se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
namespace std {
template struct coroutine_traits {
using promise_type = _Result::promise_type;
};
template struct coroutine_handle;
template <> struct coroutine_handle<> {};
template s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
Bug ID: 94288
Summary: co_await in while loop crashes g++
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93937
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:35:54AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94228
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:41:23AM +, markwayne1969 at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> >
> > > Links to information about gcc development for this specific
> > > possi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Latent since r5-6439-ge9d5a1a001f798a90fe6fcb031138740ce6ffb36.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48093
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48093&action=edit
Patch candidate
There's a patch candidate. Can you please test it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94287
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94261
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dcc4502f316a7320fe72b62c60af12c77e1c96c
commit r10-7335-g4dcc4502f316a7320fe72b62c60af12c77e1c96c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94287
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Though it's likely a duplicate of PR94239.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94287
Bug ID: 94287
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at
libcpp/line-map.c:993
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That patch looks fine, thank you!
Is there some way you can test if this works? Ideally in the testsuite
of course, but that can be hard :-/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94280
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Maybe somehow related to PR89506 , which is fixed on trunk, but has a similar
testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94277
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r10-7327-20200323085706-g2fa4b1ffd6e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-armv7a-hardfloat
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200323 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94275
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
There's a small chance the symbol disappeared due to an experimental change
relating to PR 94253. Otherwise, nothing has changed in the PA back end for
some
time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94277
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually even older. Anyway, this is another case where -w affects
-fcompare-debug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94277
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the real problem is r6-3345-g4ec39494ac756ee9525371d2225f55f18200d8e0 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0d84ecc55f3ea86764b119040c5ffde36cd0524
commit r10-7334-gb0d84ecc55f3ea86764b119040c5ffde36cd0524
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93600
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0d84ecc55f3ea86764b119040c5ffde36cd0524
commit r10-7334-gb0d84ecc55f3ea86764b119040c5ffde36cd0524
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285
Bug ID: 94285
Summary: [9/10 Regression] gfortran: error:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_40.f90:
‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)
sincer10-1654-gffdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
FIXED for AMDGCN – see PR 81689 for Nvptx, which still fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.4.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4897bb0045dd68474176be9aafb4d77bac4b363a
commit r10-7333-g4897bb0045dd68474176be9aafb4d77bac4b363a
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94284
Bug ID: 94284
Summary: [9/10 Regression] gcc: error: fort.f90:
‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since
r9-7156-g33579b59aaf02eb7
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81689
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
While the two PRs have fixed offloading for AMDGCN, nvptx still fails with the
same error. The generated assembler is:
"ld.global.u64 %r27,[a$linkptr];\n"
But there is NO associated global-var declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94269
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94272
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282
Bug ID: 94282
Summary: [amdgcn] ld: error: undefined symbol:
__gxx_personality_v0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
Bug ID: 94283
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] gcc: error:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-bopcond-1.c:
‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since
r7-4804-gb54819879e0518b3
P
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
