[Bug bootstrap/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > Created attachment 47974 [details] > > Reduced test-case > I doubt this is a reduced testcase. It is a reduced test

[Bug bootstrap/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #47973|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- One question I have is which stage fails? Is it stage 2 or stage 3? Because if it is stage 3, then stage 2 is miscompiled which is causing a different miscompile in stage 3.

[Bug bootstrap/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ppc-linux-gnu Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug bootstrap/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 47974 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47974&action=edit Reduced test-case

[Bug bootstrap/94042] New: [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 Bug ID: 94042 Summary: [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/93582] [10 Regression] -Warray-bounds gives error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of struct E[1]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582 --- Comment #40 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe19699ae2883b252d30f98481d32dabff00744b commit r10-7035-gfe19699ae2883b252d30f98481d32dabff00744b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #43 from Thomas Henlich --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #42) > gfortran currently does not implement IEEE_FMA along > with a few additional IEEE_ARITHMETIC features added > in F2018. > > Note, gcc/builtins.def has fma, fmaf

[Bug c++/91607] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in equal, at cp/constexpr.c:1088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e19f06538c51fed54240a4e98277e62daa00d9b3 commit r9-8339-ge19f06538c51fed54240a4e98277e62daa00d9b3 Author: Jason Merrill Da

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #20 from Kito Cheng --- Created attachment 47972 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47972&action=edit PR90811-ipa-increase-alignment.patch Hi Jeff: Updated patch attached, tested on riscv32/riscv64, this version ta

[Bug c++/91607] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in equal, at cp/constexpr.c:1088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/94041] New: temporary object destructor called before the end of the full-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94041 Bug ID: 94041 Summary: temporary object destructor called before the end of the full-expression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/94040] New: [10 Regression] ICE in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:325 (error: 'format' attribute argument 2 value '3' refers to parameter type 'int *')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040 Bug ID: 94040 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:325 (error: 'format' attribute argument 2 value '3' refers to parameter type 'int *') Prod

[Bug tree-optimization/82689] merging writes of different types to the same location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82689 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-10-24 00:00:00 |2020-3-4 CC|

[Bug c++/90938] [9 Regression] Initializing array with {1} works, but not {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90938] [9 Regression] Initializing array with {1} works, but not {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1665d97d37559ea7403d5b3e0efd5c5ae416e1ae commit r9-8338-g1665d97d37559ea7403d5b3e0efd5c5ae416e1ae Author: Martin Sebor Date

[Bug c++/90938] [9/10 Regression] Initializing array with {1} works, but not {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb2409c60aeff498064346f85165531a3bbead14 commit r10-7034-gcb2409c60aeff498064346f85165531a3bbead14 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- It depends on r10-3735-gcb57504a550158913258e5be8ddb991376475efb :/ So, we'd have to play some games with unwrapping the NON_LVALUE_EXPR.

[Bug c++/93299] [9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15779

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93299 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93299] [9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15779

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93299 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b5d109ba3af320f65cb0707e8733eeea3c96262 commit r9-8336-g2b5d109ba3af320f65cb0707e8733eeea3c96262 Author: Marek Polacek Dat

[Bug sanitizer/93436] [9 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: sanopt with -fsanitize=address -fdump-tree-sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/93436] [9 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: sanopt with -fsanitize=address -fdump-tree-sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8b65123ea2e7f169c3e3972d3942d73f9bc commit r9-8335-gd8b65123ea2e7f169c3e3972d3942d73f9bc Author: Marek Polacek Dat

[Bug c++/93676] [8/9 Regression] crash in build_value_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93676 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b38d6242be6aeaf83cdf1f990ff3297a697e4488 commit r9-8334-gb38d6242be6aeaf83cdf1f990ff3297a697e4488 Author: Marek Polacek Da

[Bug c++/90505] [9 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90505 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90505] [9 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90505 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:581825efc30ce79d86dfb0ebf378913fdec44adf commit r9-8333-g581825efc30ce79d86dfb0ebf378913fdec44adf Author: Marek Polacek Da

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9/10 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 93898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/93898] [9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93898 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/94015] [10 Regression] Another assignment incorrectly omitted by -foptimize-strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94015 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Nate Eldredge from comment #4) A compile-time only test that doesn't depend on the target or endianness would be much better than a runtime test that fails only on a subset of targets. The way t

[Bug bootstrap/93962] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 regression] bootstrap |bootstrap fails with

[Bug bootstrap/93962] [10 regression] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20a235a8b443a81ea0ec6a10f260b119f2193a69 commit r10-7032-g20a235a8b443a81ea0ec6a10f260b119f2193a69 Author: Jeff Law Date: Wed Mar 4 16

[Bug middle-end/94035] Wrong optimization: conditional equivalence vs. values with several representations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think pseudo-denormals should be considered trap representations.

[Bug c++/90691] [9 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90997] [9 Regression] ICE on a memset in a template in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:18480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90997 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10) > Don't know if I should pursue this backport. Seems like it depends on other fixes, not sure how hard they will be to find. Your call.

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9af9e004831f8efdfb68c2affea07b17fadd3279 commit r9-8332-g9af9e004831f8efdfb68c2affea07b17fadd3279 Author: Jason Merrill Dat

[Bug c++/90997] [9 Regression] ICE on a memset in a template in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:18480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90997 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:831d4a690053599d2d0aa9713642b8513fdf8f5b commit r9-8331-g831d4a690053599d2d0aa9713642b8513fdf8f5b Author: Jason Merrill Dat

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6876b269bc7fe6465fedfed87c31e6175992129f commit r10-7031-g6876b269bc7fe6465fedfed87c31e6175992129f Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug tree-optimization/93986] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 since r10-5451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93986 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10591cfe6cac200e926a73f3b8065147ce84 commit r10-7030-g10591cfe6cac200e926a73f3b8065147ce84 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/93986] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 since r10-5451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93986 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/49854] Clean up SPE/e500 option handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/84302] ICE: Segmentation fault (in extract_insn) on SPE target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84302 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/85170] ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3139 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85170 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/87083] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87083 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug target/37759] powerpc option -mabi=no-spe still generates SPE instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37759 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/93806] Wrong optimization: instability of floating-point results with -funsafe-math-optimizations leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93806 --- Comment #41 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 4 Mar 2020, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > We're actually careful about the sign of zero here when recording > requivalences for propagation. I don't see anything preventing > e

[Bug target/71012] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9348 when compiling stress-ng

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71012 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/81628] Backport r250637 and r250638 to the powerpcspe* target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81628 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/85121] Assembler messages: Error: operand out of range (264 is not between 0 and 248)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85121 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/86133] powerpc (-mcpu=8548) internal compiler error for double variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86133 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 commit r10-7028-g4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 Author: David Malcolm Date: We

[Bug c++/94039] New: conditional operator fails to use proper overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039 Bug ID: 94039 Summary: conditional operator fails to use proper overload Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 commit r10-7028-g4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 Author: David Malcolm Date: We

[Bug c++/94038] Compiling with -Wall causes function template body to get needlessly instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > > This seems to be a regression from GCC 9. > > Are you sure? I see the same thing with GCC 6. Oops, you're right, it's not a regression.

[Bug c++/94034] [10 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86801, which changed state. Bug 86801 Summary: Powerpcspe port (may) need updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86801 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/86801] Powerpcspe port (may) need updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86801 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/36566] Cannot bind packed field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566 --- Comment #13 from Rene Rahn --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12) > (In reply to Rene Rahn from comment #10) > > I know this is quite old now. But can someone explain me why using `#pragma > > pack(push, 1)` does work then? I couldn

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- With this patch GCC 9 ICEs on: $ ./cc1plus -quiet pr87768.C -std=gnu++2a -fconcepts pr87768.C: In instantiation of ‘constexpr const bool c::f’: pr87768.C:14:29: required from here pr87768.C:9:29: internal

[Bug middle-end/92478] [8 Regression] ICE on strcpy referencing an element of a static local constant array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92478 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 Regression] ICE: |[8 Regression] ICE on |

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9/10 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/94038] Compiling with -Wall causes function template body to get needlessly instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/93978] A snippet using views::join fails to compile with -O1, but succeeds with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93978 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||94038 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/94038] New: Compiling with -Wall causes function template to get needlessly instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038 Bug ID: 94038 Summary: Compiling with -Wall causes function template to get needlessly instantiated Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug rtl-optimization/94037] New: Runtime varies 2x just by order of two int assignments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94037 Bug ID: 94037 Summary: Runtime varies 2x just by order of two int assignments Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target Milestone|-

[Bug target/80700] [8 Regression] ICE: Bus error (on SPE target)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[8/9/10 Regr

[Bug target/81288] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on 32-bit BE powerpcspe w/ -misel -O2 (-O3, -Ofast, -Os)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81288 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- Works in GCC 9, as in, the target does not exist any more in GCC 9.

[Bug middle-end/93806] Wrong optimization: instability of floating-point results with -funsafe-math-optimizations leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93806 --- Comment #40 from Alexander Cherepanov --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #35) > > You seem to say that either Annex F is fully there or not at all but why? > > -fno-signed-zeros breaks Annex F but only parts of it. Isn't it possibl

[Bug c++/91993] [8/9/10 Regression] Spurious -Wconversion warning with -fsanitize=undefined since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 47971 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47971&action=edit gcc10-pr91993-wip.patch As implemented in this completely untested (so far) patch, which makes the -Wconversion

[Bug inline-asm/93981] No EH information generated for asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93981 --- Comment #15 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 47970 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47970&action=edit alternative patch v3 Alternative to last patch. Inserts the debug stmt across the fallthrough edg

[Bug c++/36566] Cannot bind packed field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c++/91993] [8/9/10 Regression] Spurious -Wconversion warning with -fsanitize=undefined since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Yes, the ICE was fixed by r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa. It's a similar issue to the reproducer for PR analyzer/93993. I'll add your reproducer as a further regression test; thanks.

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9/10 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92601] [9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/94036] New: [9 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94036 Bug ID: 94036 Summary: [9 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.c fails Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/94035] Wrong optimization: conditional equivalence vs. values with several representations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov --- clang bug -- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45101

[Bug middle-end/94035] New: Wrong optimization: conditional equivalence vs. values with several representations

c && ./a.out py[8] = 1 py[8] = 0 -- gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200304 (experimental) -- The value 0x1p-16382l admits two representations: 00 00 80 00 00 00 00

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-05-16 00:00:00 |2020-3-4 See Also|

[Bug c++/91953] [8 Regression] G++ rejects lambda with constexpr variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91953 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] G++|[8 Regression] G++ rejects

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- I can no longer reproduce this with r10-7026 , seems to be fixed by r10-7023

[Bug c++/94034] New: Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034 Bug ID: 94034 Summary: Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81401] False positive sprintf warning at O2 (-Wformat-overflow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81401 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ca63e1c76b7693b5d3f5ba2567421defc764249 commit r10-7027-g3ca63e1c76b7693b5d3f5ba2567421defc764249 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/81401] False positive sprintf warning at O2 (-Wformat-overflow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81401 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/85741] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wformat-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741 Bug 85741 depends on bug 81401, which changed state. Bug 81401 Summary: False positive sprintf warning at O2 (-Wformat-overflow) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81401 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/93800] [9/10 Regression] GCC adds unwanted nops to align loops on powerpc 8xx since r9-1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93800 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/94033] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity --- It does not look similar to 93923. There, there is an incomplete type. In my reproducer the type is complete but the default constructor is private. Note that for simple cases is_trivially_constructible works (

[Bug libstdc++/94003] is_constructible seems to have sideeffects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94003 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/94025] Expected-to-fail compilation goes through by not detecting mutable-specifier on lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94025 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/94033] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Probably another instance of PR 93983 and PR PR 93923.

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/83733] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on bounded integer when inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83733 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/94032] Please provide std::string::__resize_default_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94032 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- We'll add it when it's in the draft standard. Adding it before then would either mean only making it available for C++20 mode, or adding it to the shared library exports as a stable ABI artefact. Neither se

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #42 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:35:02PM +, thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 > > --- Comment #41 from Thomas Henlich --- > One would assume that fast FMA

[Bug bootstrap/93962] [10 regression] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So do you think you could attach preprocessed sources from both the working and failing builds so that we can look up at the differences?

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >