https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90997
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da11ffbba8741e085095f49037860de8e8701a1f
commit r10-6228-gda11ffbba8741e085095f49037860de8e8701a1f
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90997
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91718
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #126 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #123)
> Just for reference, these are the stage1 sizes for cc1 and cc1plus on hpux:
> gcc-10:
> -bash-4.4$ /opt/gnu/bin/size cc1 cc1plus
>textdata bss d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #125 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-25 7:59 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> Please let me know what you would like me to try next.
Let's look at testsuite log in /gcc/testsuite/gcc. This should show
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437
Bug ID: 93437
Summary: On protobuf generated code, -Warray-bounds is brittle
and not very helpful
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #124 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #122)
> There is a script in contrib/test_summary. If you run it in the top of your
> build directory and
> direct output to a file, it will generate a script to uplo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Works for me on the trunk.
I misunderstood the output that is why I said it worked for me. The output
change is just so slight that I missed the change :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #4)
> Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
>
> The description of the Bugzilla component called "sanitizer" should be
> corrected. Currently i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05107d4e4ccd11ecc8712d6e271fcb4b5f17060f
commit r10-6226-g05107d4e4ccd11ecc8712d6e271fcb4b5f17060f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92788
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc74832213ba1fc7abe402573a0b381e1c404df0
commit r10-6225-gcc74832213ba1fc7abe402573a0b381e1c404df0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
Summary|ICE during GIMPLE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
The description of the Bugzilla component called "sanitizer" should be
corrected. Currently it reads as if I should report any libsanitizer bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #2)
> But why is there a bug category called sanitizer then, which even mentions
> libsanitizer?
Because some things are specific to gcc. Like the configure and the mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
But why is there a bug category called sanitizer then, which even mentions
libsanitizer?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
--- Comment #1 from Bartosz Szreder ---
Created attachment 47709
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47709&action=edit
Preprocessed source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
Bug ID: 93436
Summary: ICE during GIMPLE pass: sanopt with -fsanitize=address
-fdump-tree-sanopt
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Works for me on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93435
Bug ID: 93435
Summary: Hang with -O2 on innocuous looking code with GCC 8.3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
Bug ID: 93434
Summary: Miscompilation with -O3 starting from 8.1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93426
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
Bug ID: 93433
Summary: sanitizer_linux.cc contains non-Linux-specific code
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93414
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93414
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de0684bf3f72c1e7a29704bce215ab40bcb84bb6
commit r10-6224-gde0684bf3f72c1e7a29704bce215ab40bcb84bb6
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91348
Chris Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at gmch dot uk
--- Comment #3 from Chri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93412
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47708
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47708&action=edit
gcc10-pr93412.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93432
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93392
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93432
Bug ID: 93432
Summary: variable is used uninitialized, but gcc shows no
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93430
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47707
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47707&action=edit
gcc10-pr93430.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93431
Bug ID: 93431
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C -std=c++2a (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #123 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-24 10:50 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> In the meantime, as per your suggestion, I have used the size tool to check
> the
> size of the text section, and it was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #122 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-25 1:18 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> Hi Dave, after a bit of trial and error, I was able to get Tcl, expect and
> DejaGnu to run from what I can tell. It also l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93422
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93424
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93427
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93430
Bug ID: 93430
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.c:3073
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93430
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93429
Bug ID: 93429
Summary: Missed IPA-CP on by-ref argument directly passed
through from caller
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Feng Xue :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98dd8c97e44ee8134cecf681045b715a8a73c7cd
commit r10-6222-g98dd8c97e44ee8134cecf681045b715a8a73c7cd
Author: Feng Xue
Date: Sun Jan 19 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47356|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
--- Comment #29 from Trass3r ---
Ah I see, ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
--- Comment #28 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Trass3r from comment #27)
> This should really be enabled by -Wall or -Wextra as it generates code that
> may easily crash or corrupt something.
But GCC supports this fully. That is why it is/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
Trass3r changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trass3r at gmail dot com
--- Comment #27 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38308
--- Comment #7 from jerome.h...@planete-sciences.org ---
I know nothing of the inner workings of gcc, but what I can imagine, is that to
check a wchar_t string is easier than a char string, because some encodings may
use variable length multibyte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88589
--- Comment #5 from Lionel Debroux ---
Thanks for your tests.
On my side, with Debian 9's m68k-elf-gcc:
* the ICE reproduces just fine when using -Os but not when using -O2;
* when the cause of the ICE is commented out, the wrong codegen for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93428
Bug ID: 93428
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_slp_perm_load
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166
--- Comment #7 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6)
> I've got state, so I'll take this as well.
Here is a patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg00068.html,
waiting for review from someone
63 matches
Mail list logo
