[Bug testsuite/93058] FAIL: g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C -O2 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93058 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > @Sergei: Can you please send a patch for this? Sent as https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01642.html

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:37:04PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > If the parameter attribute is removed or a non zero sized array is used, the > ICE does not occur. > > The ICE occurs in g

[Bug target/92767] [m68k]: Random ICE: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92767 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/93410] [9 only] can't use _Decimal64 in C99/C11/C17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93410 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I doubt GCC 9 is going to change.

[Bug c/93410] New: can't use _Decimal64 in C99/C11/C17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93410 Bug ID: 93410 Summary: can't use _Decimal64 in C99/C11/C17 mode Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug analyzer/93368] FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93368 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93367] FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/abort.c (test for warnings, line 71)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93367 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93367] FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/abort.c (test for warnings, line 71)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93367 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0b935ac66bc9804b0864151e5f1bfde5ac1ddeb commit r10-6195-ga0b935ac66bc9804b0864151e5f1bfde5ac1ddeb Author: David Malcolm Date: Th

[Bug target/92767] [m68k]: Random ICE: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92767 --- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Recent builds have been fine: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-10&arch=m68k&ver=10-20200117-2&stamp=1579373512&raw=0 I guess it's safe to close this issue.

[Bug target/88589] ICE + seemingly wrong codegen with m68k-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88589 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/92395] m68k-linux-gnu-gcc generates wrong code when the -mshort option is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92395 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug target/92767] [m68k]: Random ICE: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92767 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93349] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Within the analyzer exploded_graph::process_node has: 2312 /* Update cfun and input_location in case of an ICE: make it easier to 2313 track down which source construct we're failing to handle.

[Bug c++/42129] ICE in pointer difference with sizeof(int)>sizeof(void *)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42129 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug translation/90162] exclamation mark in diagnostic!!!!!1111!!!!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90162 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/92269] Profiling (-p) does not work on H8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92269 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/92924] [10 regression] reproducible indirect call profile merging causes 80% slowdown in Firefox pref-reftest-singletons id-getter microbenchmarks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- -fvpt still has no effect on Firefox https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/compare?originalProject=try&originalRevision=20725e2c319ad69128f075248bc41a0e97029437&newProject=try&newRevision=8a26cb77fed6ccc67

[Bug tree-optimization/91882] boolean XOR tautology missed optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91882 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This is a job for reassociation pass really. coming into that pass we have: _1 = a_3(D) | b_4(D); if (_1 != 0) goto ; [50.00%] else goto ; [50.00%] [local count: 536870913]: _5 = a_3(D) &

[Bug inline-asm/93027] ICE: in match_reload, at lra-constraints.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a26c7b3a3569a5e1b6f0342e50aefe76ad0ec4d commit r10-6190-g3a26c7b3a3569a5e1b6f0342e50aefe76ad0ec4d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug other/93409] New: [10 Regression] gcn libgomp plugin fails to build for x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93409 Bug ID: 93409 Summary: [10 Regression] gcn libgomp plugin fails to build for x32 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- You cannot use that from intrinsics. But the target code can do similar of course, whether or not asm syntax for this exists.

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- If PowerPC back-end supported the "Flag Output Operands" part of GCC's inline-asm, you could use that to do the correct thing. But sadly PowerPC does not currently. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Exten

[Bug c/38308] -Wformat does not work for wide strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38308 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jerome.hamm@planete-science

[Bug c++/93406] No argument checking for wchar_t variants of print-like functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93406 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- > Sorry about the failing tests. > > As noted in comment #4, r10-6152-gda7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b > hopefully fixes all of these iss

[Bug target/91838] [8/9 Regression] incorrect use of shr and shrx to shift by 64, missed optimization of vector shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- FWIW, I'd prefer gnu::vector_size(N) to not introduce any additional UB over the scalar arithmetic types. I.e. behave like if promotion would happen, just with final assignment back to T (truncation).

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] Wrong |[8/9 Regression] Wrong code

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32667e04c7153d97d09d81c1af073d400f0c719a commit r10-6186-g32667e04c7153d97d09d81c1af073d400f0c719a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug c++/93345] [10 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93345 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/93408] New: PPC: Provide intrinsics for cache prefetch instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93408 Bug ID: 93408 Summary: PPC: Provide intrinsics for cache prefetch instructions Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/93345] [10 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93345 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20afdcd36982752ba012960b862e9be7154b1274 commit r10-6183-g20afdcd36982752ba012960b862e9be7154b1274 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #11 from Matt Emmerton --- > > > > The implementation of stwcx() and stdcx() need revision on PPC. > > > > As I understand it, there is no need the mfocrf instruction nor the > > > > mask-and-shift on result. > > > > > > How else wou

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 92804, which changed state. Bug 92804 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 What|Removed |Adde

[Bug c++/92804] [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92804] [10 Regression] ICE trying to use concept as a nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92804 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paolo Carlini : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c91072247eb066ec9c6cd0b0f949c7dae691e46c commit r10-6185-gc91072247eb066ec9c6cd0b0f949c7dae691e46c Author: Paolo Carlini Date: Th

[Bug c++/93331] [10 Regression] ICE in build2, at tree.c:4792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93331 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f346913f2a87e26c6095d9fbf3d20f926c5470a commit r10-6184-g6f346913f2a87e26c6095d9fbf3d20f926c5470a Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug c++/93331] [10 Regression] ICE in build2, at tree.c:4792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93331 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/33799] Return value's destructor not executed when a local variable's destructor throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20afdcd36982752ba012960b862e9be7154b1274 commit r10-6183-g20afdcd36982752ba012960b862e9be7154b1274 Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #118 from EML --- (In reply to EML from comment #117) > I do appreciate someone else taking a look at this; I've had a lot of > changes at work, so this really took a back seat. And I don't have access to > the HP compiler to try thin

[Bug target/93012] PPC: inefficient 64-bit constant generation (upper = lower)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93012 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #117 from EML --- I do appreciate someone else taking a look at this; I've had a lot of changes at work, so this really took a back seat. And I don't have access to the HP compiler to try things. I think this is an important step is i

[Bug middle-end/90348] [8/9/10 Regression] Partition of char arrays is incorrect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 23, 2020 6:00:02 PM GMT+01:00, "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348 > >--- Comment #19 from Alexander Monakov >--- >(In reply to Mi

[Bug target/93127] PPC altivec vec_promote creates unnecessary xxpermdi instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93127 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-*-* |powerpc*-*-* --- Comment #3 from Se

[Bug target/91838] [8/9 Regression] incorrect use of shr and shrx to shift by 64, missed optimization of vector shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov --- Ah, indeed, it should be explicitly UB, and the documentation should mention that as well as that implicit integer promotion does not happen for vector shifts and other operations.

[Bug target/93123] Lacking basic optimization around __int128 bitwise operations against constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93123 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-*-* |powerpc*-*-* Status|UNC

[Bug tree-optimization/93407] New: Dead partial memset not optimized away (clang does that)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93407 Bug ID: 93407 Summary: Dead partial memset not optimized away (clang does that) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/93406] New: No argument checking for wchar_t variants of print-like functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93406 Bug ID: 93406 Summary: No argument checking for wchar_t variants of print-like functions Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/93404] [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 47701 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47701&action=edit inliner size stats parser It took me a while to find some reasonable way to analyze code size regressions caused

[Bug middle-end/90348] [8/9/10 Regression] Partition of char arrays is incorrect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348 --- Comment #19 from Alexander Monakov --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #18) > represent all accesses indirectly via pointers Would that be necessary in presence of a verifier that ensures that all references are dominated by births?

[Bug c/84919] [8/9 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Summary|[8/9/10 Regression

[Bug testsuite/93391] [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yup, that fixed all the errors I was seeing on powerpc64.

[Bug middle-end/90348] [8/9/10 Regression] Partition of char arrays is incorrect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348 --- Comment #18 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #17) > I think part of the problem is trying to make "deaths" explicit via CLOBBERs > without making "births" also explicit in the IR. Yes, that's basically the cr

[Bug analyzer/93375] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 47700 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47700&action=edit gcc10-pr93402.patch Untested fix.

[Bug analyzer/93375] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:648796dab42b6e839f10fee5835f24cd2016a9f4 commit r10-6182-g648796dab42b6e839f10fee5835f24cd2016a9f4 Author: David Malcolm Date: We

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 --- Comment #3 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to markeggleston from comment #2) > f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_match_varspec, at > fortran/primary.c:2389 > 0x727097 gfc_match_varspec(gfc_expr*, int, bool, bool) >

[Bug testsuite/93391] [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Now fixed.

[Bug testsuite/93391] [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d00f052ef209bacdd93f503b0c5fb428cc6c434 commit r10-6181-g6d00f052ef209bacdd93f503b0c5fb428cc6c434 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 --- Comment #37 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d00f052ef209bacdd93f503b0c5fb428cc6c434 commit r10-6181-g6d00f052ef209bacdd93f503b0c5fb428cc6c434 Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug analyzer/93405] Passing constant arguments to subroutines in Fortran ... and the analyzer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93405 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90348] [8/9/10 Regression] Partition of char arrays is incorrect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug testsuite/93391] [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/93279] [9/10 Regression] C++ Template substitution ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug analyzer/93405] New: Passing constant arguments to subroutines in Fortran ... and the analyzer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93405 Bug ID: 93405 Summary: Passing constant arguments to subroutines in Fortran ... and the analyzer. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug rtl-optimization/93235] [AArch64] ICE with __fp16 in a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #4 from

[Bug target/91838] [8/9 Regression] incorrect use of shr and shrx to shift by 64, missed optimization of vector shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- Good point. Since gnu::vector_size(N) types are defined by you, you might be able to say that for char and short this is also UB. After all the left operand isn't actually promoted to int. Consequently

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ipa/93369] [10 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr64076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Why? Is there any advantage to that? The probability of having a collision anywhere in the repo is nihil with ten digits already, and anywhere in the world ever with twelve. Why do we want thirty-two?

[Bug tree-optimization/93404] New: [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404 Bug ID: 93404 Summary: [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/93365] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- -(insn 14 13 23 2 (parallel [ -(set (reg:DI 1 dx [94]) -(plus:DI (reg:DI 1 dx [95]) -(reg:DI 5 di [92]))) -(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags)) -]) "

[Bug ipa/93385] [10 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor --- Another option, which does not create an inter-pass dependency and does not clutter tree-inline any more, but which pessimizes IPA-SRA (put perhaps just alittle bit?), is making sure that the statements whic

[Bug target/93376] [10 Regression] ICE: in immed_wide_int_const_1, at emit-rtl.c:660 with -Og -finline-functions-called-once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93376 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c124b345e460780e3c3d4a6e58d0e6e03da982a1 commit r10-6178-gc124b345e460780e3c3d4a6e58d0e6e03da982a1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug libstdc++/91947] std::filesystem::file_size will return wrong value on 32bit platforms with large files support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04681fca936b5bca1dd374dfb0fbca7ccb028994 commit r10-6177-g04681fca936b5bca1dd374dfb0fbca7ccb028994 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/91947] std::filesystem::file_size will return wrong value on 32bit platforms with large files support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk, backport to the branch needed too.

[Bug c++/92778] ICE: Illegal instruction signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92778 Hannes Hauswedell changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93395] AVX2 missed optimization : _mm256_permute_pd() is unfortunately translated into the more expensive VPERMPD instead of the cheap VPERMILPD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93395 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug gcov-profile/93403] __gcov_indirect_call_profiler_v4 needs atomic version.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93403 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91824] unnecessary sign-extension after _mm_movemask_epi8 or __builtin_popcount

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91824 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug gcov-profile/93403] New: __gcov_indirect_call_profiler_v4 needs atomic version.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93403 Bug ID: 93403 Summary: __gcov_indirect_call_profiler_v4 needs atomic version. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] New: Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 Bug ID: 93402 Summary: Wrong code when returning padded struct Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug target/91838] [8/9 Regression] incorrect use of shr and shrx to shift by 64, missed optimization of vector shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/93157] gcc should use -mabi=elfv2 on powerpc64-*-linux-*musl* target by default.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93157 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Someone who can test this should send a patch, and Cc: the Musl OS port maintainer (is there one? There should be!)

[Bug target/93157] gcc should use -mabi=elfv2 on powerpc64-*-linux-*musl* target by default.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93157 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/93398] PGO bootstrap is not reproducible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Also forgot to mention, it is also quite possible that some of the small divergences propagate themselves into differences in the histogram and thus differences in hot/cold decisions in completely unrelated cod

[Bug target/93176] PPC: inefficient 64-bit constant consecutive ones

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- When you want the bits from bit MB to ME (inclusive) set, you can just do li t,-1 rldic d,T,MB,63-ME (bit # 0 is the high bit; can also do wrap-around masks this way). Confirmed.

[Bug bootstrap/93398] PGO bootstrap is not reproducible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- The divergence for non-randomization seems under control. But it also seems that the divergence for randomized build is way too common to be explained by differences in number of conflicts for hashtables hasing

[Bug c++/92440] Error output for first error truncated with -fmax-errors=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93401] [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use -fprofile-generate= on setups with different instrumentation and feedback directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/93401] [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use -fprofile-generate= on setups with different instrumentation and feedback directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93401] [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use -fprofile-generate= on setups with different instrumentation and feedback directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/93401] New: [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use -fprofile-generate= on setups with different instrumentation and feedback directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401 Bug ID: 93401 Summary: [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use -fprofile-generate= on setups with different instrumentation and feedback directories Product: gcc

[Bug target/92469] ICE: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame' in 7/8/9/10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Matt Emmerton from comment #9) > > > __sync() > > > __isync() > > > __lwsync() > > > > The sync intrinsics need to be tied to some other code. A volatile asm with > > a "memory" clobber i

[Bug debug/92444] gcc generates wrong debug information at -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92444 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/92472] enhancement: 5 * constify some parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92472 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug demangler/92453] write buffer overflow in cplus_demangle()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92453 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >