https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92989
--- Comment #2 from Dragan Mladjenovic ---
Thanks,
I've checked https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01209.html, but
there are still similar build failures down the line. I have to double-check it
and will post any findings later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
Bug ID: 93398
Summary: PGO bootstrap is not reproducible
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87944
Stefan "Bebbo" Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefan at franke dot ms
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #3)
> Will do in the future re: using g:
Good.
>
> Should it also go in the Summary line? The hashes would make it quite long.
Dunno, but I don't do it as it would really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93397
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93397
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93397
Bug ID: 93397
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in
vect_create_epilog_for_reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93396
Bug ID: 93396
Summary: [RX] tail call optimization does not work with
indirect call
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #115 from Peter Bisroev ---
Hi Dave,
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #114)
> I would try to build 4.7.4 directly with aCC or gcc 3.3.6 (i.e., skip
> intermediates).
When I tried building 4.7.4 with aCC, 3-stage bootstrap comple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93367
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from David Malco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93368
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93382
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93382
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:591b59ebfcd48319452ebbd954267c9a05ba4b78
commit r10-6164-g591b59ebfcd48319452ebbd954267c9a05ba4b78
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #114 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-22 7:18 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> >From what I can see in my other tests, we need C++ compiler built with GCC
> 4.7.4 to bootstrap GCC 6.1.0 and above. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92830
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93394
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See PR 52766 and PR 65299 and PR 92849
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
Peter Bisroev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.bisroev at groundlabs
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93394
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92810
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68687
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55b7df8bfb12938e7716445d4e2dc0d2ddf44bac
commit r10-6157-g55b7df8bfb12938e7716445d4e2dc0d2ddf44bac
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55b7df8bfb12938e7716445d4e2dc0d2ddf44bac
commit r10-6157-g55b7df8bfb12938e7716445d4e2dc0d2ddf44bac
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, I accidentally cut off the test run output. I assume this doesn't
change your analysis, though.
Running it in gdb shows:
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x3fffb7cd247c in .r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Inappropriate use of signaling comparisons on powerpc is bug 58684.
Documento 429kb (Visualizar)
Boa tarde, segue em anexo Guia do
pedido,Cadastramento da inclusão em CPF.
Atenciosamente,DIANA VIEIRA SILVA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26724
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to pskocik from comment #3)
> I don't know if this is related,
It isn't, please file a separate bug report. memcmp is optimized to an integer
comparison in strlen, much later than the lowering of __b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93278
--- Comment #11 from doug mcilroy ---
When I ran it on Linux, I did get catastrophe: "No space left on device". I do
not know what device; ~ and /tmp live in different file systems. It's been
decades since I last saw that diagnostic. It also took
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93395
Bug ID: 93395
Summary: AVX2 missed optimization : _mm256_permute_pd() is
unfortunately translated into the more expensive
VPERMPD instead of the cheap VPERMILPD
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ec6673ada331b9eed0771875e58881049ec6915
commit r8-9948-g7ec6673ada331b9eed0771875e58881049ec6915
Author: Joseph Myers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93378
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93378
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:597e403d6dbb44315f33fb2b5bb0ca4946a4a1e1
commit r10-6154-g597e403d6dbb44315f33fb2b5bb0ca4946a4a1e1
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93394
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93378
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd9982bb0051d1a678191b684bb907d1ac177991
commit r10-6153-gfd9982bb0051d1a678191b684bb907d1ac177991
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93394
Bug ID: 93394
Summary: Request for operator* is ambiguous when binary and
unary overloads are in different base classes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b
commit r10-6152-gda7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93291
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b
commit r10-6152-gda7cf663b75513e4d2baf5a579ffcb4f8a61193b
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Function |[8 Regression] Function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93307
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93335
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6c79134021b328e8ab379d4d8c76f4e3c061b44
commit r9-8169-gb6c79134021b328e8ab379d4d8c76f4e3c061b44
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93329
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39d602ba468c722077c9bdebaae16b8300c66028
commit r9-8166-g39d602ba468c722077c9bdebaae16b8300c66028
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91298
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1c29dc8a3b9c776919e7d1489d45060d2c24f2a
commit r9-8168-gd1c29dc8a3b9c776919e7d1489d45060d2c24f2a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93073
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1abe8d45b71fa42f5d1690920e9c9d0087168b83
commit r9-8164-g1abe8d45b71fa42f5d1690920e9c9d0087168b83
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51faa475c91c5373b680889664d1d52a73a79776
commit r9-8165-g51faa475c91c5373b680889664d1d52a73a79776
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93307
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75038aa6aa5b562e6358108619d66ef2ccab9a53
commit r10-6151-g75038aa6aa5b562e6358108619d66ef2ccab9a53
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93228
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:514314b73109b3672ecb3c3c04f614bb7c7fef57
commit r9-8163-g514314b73109b3672ecb3c3c04f614bb7c7fef57
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93219
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13e141515f5f9f2386c4a894326929f03fb59076
commit r9-8161-g13e141515f5f9f2386c4a894326929f03fb59076
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5ce64f7d50e2f5e66ceeb88c7601bd04f3b94ea
commit r9-8162-ga5ce64f7d50e2f5e66ceeb88c7601bd04f3b94ea
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93087
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bf1518f84d5e676dd5f4335783eaf7b742961a5
commit r9-8158-g7bf1518f84d5e676dd5f4335783eaf7b742961a5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93065
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26e1a1c66f2c651a3b1b5e5b5a00e4275df2ee51
commit r9-8157-g26e1a1c66f2c651a3b1b5e5b5a00e4275df2ee51
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93088
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75cdf669074fe6a49ea6a3582acf54d00acfa9ce
commit r9-8159-g75cdf669074fe6a49ea6a3582acf54d00acfa9ce
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e94f77146e63f0b26ce2cc1cf8f42ac493d777a
commit r9-8160-g5e94f77146e63f0b26ce2cc1cf8f42ac493d777a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92992
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:beee53d59e32e7859b32b19bc7e222e3d04cc5f0
commit r9-8155-gbeee53d59e32e7859b32b19bc7e222e3d04cc5f0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbc84c8b7f793616bb1f87c60c99f82a55aa423c
commit r9-8156-gdbc84c8b7f793616bb1f87c60c99f82a55aa423c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
resolve_args gets a vector of arguments, one of which is
(gdb) p arg
$3 =
(gdb) pt
>
readonly constant
decl
readonly constant decl_0 VOID 93383.C:15:10
align:1 warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
Bug ID: 93393
Summary: [10 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr93133.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: oth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
r7-5532-g35f4cbd4489519983a4f64da846be8352f611879 compiles OK
r7-5533-ga93634ba09c4b33d95233e48d9c452a529555d05 ICE in unify_one_argument
r7-6939-g853ef4e5632df32894b2366096c1ae1ef4ba03df ICE in resolve_args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> > Marking status as SUSPENDED for now and setting Target Milestone to 11 (in
> > the hope of adding c++ support to th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93392
Bug ID: 93392
Summary: Issue a "sorry" on attempts to use -fanalyzer with C++
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92907
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92907
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1fd040884ab7ac36caab5822bcb5e51e8d8
commit r10-6149-ge1fd040884ab7ac36caab5822bcb5e51e8d8
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92978
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a11e92c4e7fd660b0f5ea2095439dc33738c69a5
commit r9-8154-ga11e92c4e7fd660b0f5ea2095439dc33738c69a5
Author: Joseph Myers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
The assumption is that DCE will eventually remove all gimple
assignments with LHS which has no uses if gimple_has_volatile_ops
returns false for them. I have had only a brief look at DCE today and
it seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93324
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93324
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15ed55eabb0cf8a2974b8025a9f46c9e58960811
commit r10-6148-g15ed55eabb0cf8a2974b8025a9f46c9e58960811
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
Bug ID: 93391
Summary: [10 regression] new test cases
c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Is that safe though?
I mean, does ipa-sra use exactly the same logic as dce does? Say statements
that could throw with non-call-exceptions and all that kinds of details.
Wouldn't it be safer e.g. to perform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93390
Bug ID: 93390
Summary: AARCH64: FP move costs needs improvements for
ThunderX2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
I'm going to test a patch that basically does the following (plus moving
push_cfun a bit):
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-sra.c b/gcc/ipa-sra.c
index 31de527d111..e18dc6958dc 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-sra.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92541
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A new bug please, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92541
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
Oh okay, how should I proceed? Create a new issue or hijack this one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93345
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
YSC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yankel.scialom-ext@natixis.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Concerning:
> Honza, the type_has_components_p check in
>
> if (compare_type_sizes (TREE_TYPE (ref2), type1) >= 0
> && (!end_struct_ref1
> || compare_type_sizes (TREE_TYPE (ref2),
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
Bug ID: 93389
Summary: Failure to detect UB in constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Ah, -fno-tree-dce is specfied on the command line...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyle.show910 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93386
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The options include -fno-tree-dce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26724
pskocik at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pskocik at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Will do in the future re: using g:
Should it also go in the Summary line? The hashes would make it quite long.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And with additiona -fno-early-inlining started with
r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6c6a36ad14a7084bc1dc350e4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|deferred|patch
--- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo