https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #94 from Viktor Ostashevskyi ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #93)
> (In reply to Viktor Ostashevskyi from comment #92)
> > I've tried to run some old binaries yesterday (StarOffice 5.1, get it from
> > archive.org) and hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93257
Bug ID: 93257
Summary: consteval functions returning 'void' are rejected when
called
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93080
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> I have not looked into how to fix these regressions though.
So the problem here is that PRE decides that BIT_INSERT_EXPR is partial
redundant and moves the BIT_I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92594
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92009
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93254
--- Comment #2 from Abrahm Scully ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> The following patch that disables non-sse2 alternatives in *movsf_internal
> should fix the issue:
>
Uroš, thank you for the quick help! The patch does appear to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merril
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564
--- Comment #39 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 47649
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47649&action=edit
patch to revert to lowering loops like the C front end
Could someone with a better sense of loop code generati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92746, which changed state.
Bug 92746 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.c:1114
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92746
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92582
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92746
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93252
--- Comment #2 from Trass3r ---
Yeah it's in the same vein as the other -Wsuggest warnings which run during
lto.
Like
a.c
void f() {} // can be made static
void g() { f(); }
b.c
void g();
int main() { g(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92746
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edabbec31e3bfc9a9757f80c8610706ed00e5a1a
commit r10-5938-gedabbec31e3bfc9a9757f80c8610706ed00e5a1a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92582
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ca4435f431f9b8049ebf102b5659f2d3e7be198
commit r10-5937-g8ca4435f431f9b8049ebf102b5659f2d3e7be198
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69678
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1ba88b1b20cb579b3b7ce6ce65470205742be7e
commit r10-5936-gf1ba88b1b20cb579b3b7ce6ce65470205742be7e
Author: Xiong Hu Luo
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93238
--- Comment #7 from Khem Raj ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> *** Bug 93255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
yep, just verified my usecases, work well now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93241
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2638a44bbe43089f9fc00251592895584314a4b2
commit r9-8131-g2638a44bbe43089f9fc00251592895584314a4b2
Author: Joseph Myers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, lto
Severity|norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92746
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93255
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90916
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92582
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91226
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
Bug ID: 93256
Summary: Assumed-shape unlimited polymorphic variable passes
values incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91226
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8d3c5702a422025e42b22ce860e245b50ff57a2
commit r8-9931-ga8d3c5702a422025e42b22ce860e245b50ff57a2
Author: Joseph Myers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93254
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93249
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93201
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|81091
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81091
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
Bug 91947 depends on bug 81091, which changed state.
Bug 81091 Summary: libstdc++ not built with large file support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81091
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81091
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cb662745d38e680a1a46fa04b108734cbc3df58
commit r9-8130-g6cb662745d38e680a1a46fa04b108734cbc3df58
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cb662745d38e680a1a46fa04b108734cbc3df58
commit r9-8130-g6cb662745d38e680a1a46fa04b108734cbc3df58
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93077
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #7 from Khem Raj ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93251
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93077
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Almost certainly the sharing problem. My tester had several failures that
looked exactly the same and they're all working now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93255
--- Comment #2 from Khem Raj ---
its build config is
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=../../recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/mips-yoe-linux/mips-yoe-linux-g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/mnt/b/yoe/build/tmp/work/mips32r2-yoe-linux/icu/64.2-r0/recipe-sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93255
--- Comment #1 from Khem Raj ---
proper testcase
enum {
kLengthShift=5,
};
struct {
short int fLengthAndFlags;
} fFields;
bool isEmpty() {
return (fFields.fLengthAndFlags>>kLengthShift) == 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
*** Bug 93077 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93255
Bug ID: 93255
Summary: internal compiler error: in sign_mask, at
wide-int.h:855
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93077
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91226
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b6c608019153e3dbb03e3f5f7b7a1768727f987
commit r9-8129-g5b6c608019153e3dbb03e3f5f7b7a1768727f987
Author: Joseph Myers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93238
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj at gullik dot net
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93250
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93223
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8472660b98a31b32b7d030c2cdc4d41d326364d5
commit r10-5928-g8472660b98a31b32b7d030c2cdc4d41d326364d5
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #41 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69dc042f91c70458ffb6e7b147f093799cee2100
commit r10-5927-g69dc042f91c70458ffb6e7b147f093799cee2100
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93238
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93238
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1acad4e43908e90ca2b5155a878639cbea4c4e1
commit r10-5925-gf1acad4e43908e90ca2b5155a878639cbea4c4e1
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c82dd6c02d44d9d2cd84dda137c00b1a3cd6c90
commit r10-5926-g7c82dd6c02d44d9d2cd84dda137c00b1a3cd6c90
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
That should read "rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yeah, vec_extract should get folded in rs6000_fold_builtin eventually. I think
that Will had a patch in progress on this at one time, but ran into some
difficulties and it got abandoned in favor of more urgen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93241
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93253
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93241
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=3d77686d2eddf76d3498169d0ca5653db45a8662
commit r10-5922-g3d77686d2eddf76d3498169d0ca5653db45a8662
Author: J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92765
--- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor ---
I've been going through the test cases here. IIUC, the one in comment #10 is a
separate issue and should get its own bug. (Arguably, so is the one in comment
#7.)
It's unfortunate that GIMPLE doesn't prese
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93254
Bug ID: 93254
Summary: g++ -m32 -mfpmath=sse -msse generates sse2
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85622
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=91cd6528d2c4241a9dad88d6876e897598631be9
commit r8-9929-g91cd6528d2c4241a9dad88d6876e897598631be9
Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93253
Bug ID: 93253
Summary: Regression on non-standard hex constant syntax
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93252
Bug ID: 93252
Summary: Warning for symbols that could be internalized
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93250
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177
--- Comment #9 from Matt Emmerton ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> (In reply to Matt Emmerton from comment #4)
> > The intrinsics that we would find useful, having used them as provided by
> > the IBM XL C/C++ compiler, are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93251
Bug ID: 93251
Summary: Valid code rejected: Shape of array depends on
parameter array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177
--- Comment #8 from Matt Emmerton ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > __lwarx()
> > __ldarx()
> > __stwcx()
> > __stdcx()
>
> Is there a reason why the __atomic_* builtins don't work?
There are places in our code where we do man
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 47646
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47646&action=edit
patch I am testing
So I believe the actual issue is that the alias-set of 'bool' isn't a subset
of the alias-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Basically GCC's filesystem lib has two kinds of behaviour, POSIX and Windows.
Cygwin is a subset of POSIX, as it works like it in most respects, but I also
added support for "//foo" as a root-name, which o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I didn't implement support for that for MinGW, because I don't know how it
works for Windows (and I only vaguely know how it works for Cygwin). Please
create a separate bug report if you want to request tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 93213, which changed state.
Bug 93213 Summary: [10 Regression] wrong code with -Og -foptimize-strlen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=e13f37d9f7600d337f8a4589b5f985ded9e05852
commit r10-5917-ge13f37d9f7600d337f8a4589b5f985ded9e05852
Author: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 47645 [details]
> > Richi's modified test-case
> >
> > @Richi: Do you want to bisect this ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244
--- Comment #3 from Orgad Shaneh ---
Thank you!
I've noticed in your changed that only on cygwin double leading slashes are
preserved. Why is that? I think it should be the same on all _WIN32 compilers,
like MinGW.
A shared folder is accessed b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Created attachment 47645 [details]
> Richi's modified test-case
>
> @Richi: Do you want to bisect this version?
> If so, it started to fail also with g:dc3221e1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58605
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and even when re-instantiating that we run into the fact that
indirect_ref_may_alias_decl_p (and indirect_refs_may_alias_p) use a
"base"-alias set to disambiguate further and getting the base alias set
d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=fe7cc34fd5186cce3771e2bce2f4aacb81b9058c
commit r10-5915-gfe7cc34fd5186cce3771e2bce2f4aacb81b9058c
Author
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58605
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=e4379a931d140a71b36eaecceace319837fda321
commit r10-5914-ge4379a931d140a71b36eaecceace319837fda321
Author
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92757
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=aef85e40e0c5e242f1a1883abc56159dcd90e7b0
commit r10-5913-gaef85e40e0c5e242f1a1883abc56159dcd90e7b0
Autho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=eb7c7c524556df5364f03adc20f6a9db20858484
commit r10-5912-geb7c7c524556df5364f03adc20f6a9db20858484
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47645&action=edit
Richi's modified test-case
@Richi: Do you want to bisect this version?
If so, it started to fail also with g:dc3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm.
(gdb) p alias_set_subset_of (3, 2)
$52 = false
(gdb) p alias_set_subset_of (2, 3)
$54 = true
but
(gdb) p alias_sets_conflict_p (2, 3)
$55 = 0
(gdb) p alias_sets_conflict_p (3, 2)
$56 = 0
ah, the for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199
>
> --- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
> > Well - there's the leh_state passed to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #4)
> I guess TREE_INT_CST_LOW should fix that. The goal is to support signed and
> unsigned types.
Maybe. Though, perhaps you want to zero extend the constant from the type'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93250
Bug ID: 93250
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Note that the 'using' make it work is another wrong-code issue I think. But
clearly somehow the TYPE_TYPELESS_STORAGE handling is responsible here
(it works with 'short' padding for example). More reduced:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> So FRE optimizes
>
> wo.value = &buf;
> _48 = __MEM ((struct Optional * *)&wo);
> _20 = __MEM ((bool *)_48);
> if (_20 != _Literal (bool) 0)
> goto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0)
> int ctz2 (int x)
> {
> static const char table[32] =
> {
> 0, 1, 28, 2, 29, 14, 24, 3, 30, 22, 20, 15, 25, 17, 4, 8,
> 31, 27, 13, 23, 21, 19, 16, 7, 26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks for pointing out the target dependencies! I have tweaked my copy of the
test to avoid them and will commit the patch once the Git repository is
writeable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So FRE optimizes
wo.value = &buf;
_48 = __MEM ((struct Optional * *)&wo);
_20 = __MEM ((bool *)_48);
if (_20 != _Literal (bool) 0)
goto __BB4;
else
goto __BB3;
__BB(3):
_48->inner.p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #93 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Viktor Ostashevskyi from comment #92)
> I've tried to run some old binaries yesterday (StarOffice 5.1, get it from
> archive.org) and hit this bug.
>
> What are possible workarounds?
You need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93249
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
