https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does it make sense to fold vec_extract directly into BIT_FIELD_REF in
altivec_resolve_overloaded_builtin for constants?
Or even in rs6000_fold_builtin ?
It seems like a lot of the builtins should be fold dir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93232
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93192
--- Comment #4 from Thorsten Otto ---
BTW, how do you run the testsuite for m68k?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93192
--- Comment #3 from Thorsten Otto ---
Created attachment 47636
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47636&action=edit
Testcase
Yes, it is attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93232
Bug ID: 93232
Summary: std::array warning: writing 1 byte into a region of
size 0
[ttps://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.htm
l#index-Wstringop-overflow=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58605
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88812
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93185
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, could bugzilla change to handle (from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2020-01/msg00147.html ) words with regexps:
r([0-9]{1,6}) to http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=\1
(what we have already
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92971
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 10 22:46:46 2020
New Revision: 280151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280151&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
IPA-CP: Remove bogus static keyword (PR 92971)
2020-01-10 Martin Jambo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps with the just added native_encode_initializer, rather than having
separate function for CONSTRUCTOR and STRING_CST it might be better to always
native_encode_initializer at certain offset with byte le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Also, there is no testcase for the string case, nor any non-target specific
testcase that it at least compiles and perhaps with tree dump scan on selected
targets that it recognizes the ctz.
And I don't see a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93231
Bug ID: 93231
Summary: [10 Regression] ICEs since rr280132
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Also this code if the element number is variable:
;; Optimize extracting a single scalar element from memory.
(define_insn_and_split "*vsx_extract__load"
[(set (match_operand: 0 "register_operand" "=r")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
There is this code in rs6000.md that thinks it is combining the conversion with
the load, but the insn is using the wrong types:
;; Optimize extracting a single scalar element from memory.
(define_insn_an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 47635
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47635&action=edit
Example assembler generated for -mcpu=power9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
Bug ID: 93230
Summary: PowerPC GCC vec_extract of a vector in memory does not
fold sign/zero extension into load
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71504
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91263
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> No, a==b is equivalent to std::equal(a.begin(), a.end(), b.begin(), b.end())
> which doesn't have access to the container's equality predicate.
Sorry, I wasn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Looks like Jakub fixed this with r280140
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93210
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 10 21:18:22 2020
New Revision: 280141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280141&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/93210
* fold-const.h (native_encode_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 10 21:10:03 2020
New Revision: 280140
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280140&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/90838
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Apparently broken on other archs too, and for other people; from #gcc:
>
> nathan: I assume it's not just broken for me; I'm somewhat
> sleep-deprived here
> dmalcolm:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Apparently broken on other archs too, and for other people; from #gcc:
nathan: I assume it's not just broken for me; I'm somewhat
sleep-deprived here
dmalcolm: broke PPC
correct. I guess it's somewhat ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 10 20:45:19 2020
New Revision: 280138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2020-01-10 Vladimir Makarov
PR inline-asm/93027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93219
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 10 20:42:00 2020
New Revision: 280137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/93219
* libgomp.h (gomp_print_string): Change r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
--- Comment #2 from Wilco ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> A pristine checkout of r280132 doesn't build for me on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
>
> ../../src/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c: In function ‘bool
> simplify_count_trailing_zeroes(gim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177
--- Comment #4 from Matt Emmerton ---
The intrinsics that we would find useful, having used them as provided by the
IBM XL C/C++ compiler, are the following:
__sync()
__isync()
__lwsync()
__dcbt()
__dcbtst()
__lwarx()
__ldarx()
__stwcx()
__std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Sorry, I did a mistake in PR number and automatic commits reporting did not
work.
Here are the patches fixing the PR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=280133
https://gcc.gnu.org/vie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93207
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 10 20:18:00 2020
New Revision: 280135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2020-01-10 Vladimir Makarov
PR inline-asm/93207
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93207
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 10 20:07:45 2020
New Revision: 280133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2020-01-10 Vladimir Makarov
PR inline-asm/93207
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like a missing check to see if it is scalar int mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93229
Bug ID: 93229
Summary: simplify_count_trailing_zeroes doesn't compile on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838
--- Comment #8 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Fri Jan 10 19:32:53 2020
New Revision: 280132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280132&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR90838: Support ctz idioms
Support common idioms for count trailing zeroes using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92971
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 10 19:30:56 2020
New Revision: 280131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
IPA-CP: Remove bogus static keyword (PR 92971)
2020-01-10 Martin Jambo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93223
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93048
Bug 93048 depends on bug 93033, which changed state.
Bug 93033 Summary: [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93163
Bug 93163 depends on bug 93033, which changed state.
Bug 93033 Summary: [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93077
Bug 93077 depends on bug 93033, which changed state.
Bug 93033 Summary: [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93076
Bug 93076 depends on bug 93033, which changed state.
Bug 93033 Summary: [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91312
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kosotiro at yahoo dot gr
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34235
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 10 18:53:17 2020
New Revision: 280128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Shorten right-shift again in C++.
Back in SVN r131862 richi removed this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
--- Comment #30 from Jason Merrill ---
New patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg00624.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93173
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93143
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 93143, which changed state.
Bug 93143 Summary: [10 Regression] Multiple calls to static constexpr member
function gives wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93143
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 10 18:46:57 2020
New Revision: 280126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/93173 - incorrect tree sharing.
My patch for 93033 wasn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93143
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 10 18:47:02 2020
New Revision: 280127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/93143 - incorrect tree sharing with constexpr.
We don't un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93173
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 10 18:46:57 2020
New Revision: 280126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/93173 - incorrect tree sharing.
My patch for 93033 wasn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
I have analyzed this ICE and came to the conclusion that the assert is
wrong for polymorphic context lattices - e.g. in the reported case we
always pass the same class to first parameter, which in the recursi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93192
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93219
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91057
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|9.3
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93132
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93132
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Jan 10 17:04:00 2020
New Revision: 280124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/93132 - bogus 'attribute((access))' warning when size-index is specif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93188
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93188
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Jan 10 16:50:15 2020
New Revision: 280123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport: arm: Fix rmprofile multilibs when architecture includes +m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93228
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93227
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-12-17 21:05:39 |2020-1-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93228
Bug ID: 93228
Summary: [[deprecated("message")]] on template struct/class
drops message
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93227
Bug ID: 93227
Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/std-layout1.C fails
starting with r280065
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93226
Bug ID: 93226
Summary: OpenACC 2.6: acc_memcpy_device runtime function
missing
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 86167, which changed state.
Bug 86167 Summary: allocation variable length character array in derived type
incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86167
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86167
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93225
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 65428, which changed state.
Bug 65428 Summary: ICE on nest array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92285
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93225
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|OpenACC 2.5/2.6:|OpenACC 2.5/2.6:
|acc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93225
Bug ID: 93225
Summary: OpenACC 2.5/2.6: acc_get_default_async missing
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80757
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92285
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 10 15:27:39 2020
New Revision: 280116
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++: Make istreambuf_iterator base class consistent (PR92285)
Sinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92606
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Giving up on this.
My work-around patch to disable the malicious data optimization for avr has
effectively been rejected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg00145.html
So we can enjoy code tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92925
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So I wonder why we bother to feed 'bitpos' to
> set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos when we expect the MEM_ATTRS to be
> created from solely 'T' (do we?) and then later apply 'bitpos' via
> adjust_address or f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 84135, which changed state.
Bug 84135 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_array_cobounds, at
fortran/trans-array.c:6033
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 10 15:05:06 2020
New Revision: 280113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR84135 fix merging dimension into codimension array spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93224
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
One more test-case:
$ #include
int main()
{
long double value;
if constexpr (std::atomic_ref::is_always_lock_free)
{
bool ok;
const auto mo = std::memory_order_relaxed;
std::atomic_ref a(v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93221
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93224
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
#include
int main()
{
long double value;
if constexpr (std::atomic_ref::is_always_lock_free)
{
bool ok;
const auto mo = std::memory_order_relaxed;
std::atomic_ref a(valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 10 14:37:29 2020
New Revision: 280110
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280110&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR84135 fix merging dimension into codimension array spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg00552.html
Thanks for the fix!
Note the __int128 is supported only on certain targets, the test is
endian-depe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93219
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19
nlining -O3 test.c &&
./a.out
0
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.0 20200110 (experimental)
--
Here `r` has the same value as `p` but the optimizer canno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #41 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #38)
> (In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #37)
> > On 30/12/2019 10.51, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> > >> Obviously, it could be used to fold
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
