https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92436
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92435
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17913
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=87
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87961
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92436
Bug ID: 92436
Summary: SIMD integer subtract with constant always becomes add
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92435
Bug ID: 92435
Summary: % format codes for diagnostics are not documented in
the GCC internals manual
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61292
Jim Rees changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jimreesma at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61292
--- Comment #2 from Jim Rees ---
Created attachment 47203
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47203&action=edit
Reproducer source
Compile with -std=c++14 (or higher standard),
-O1(not -O0, for easy of compr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92434
Bug ID: 92434
Summary: noexcept couldn't be deduced in function template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92387
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92426
--- Comment #3 from Cameron ---
(In reply to W E Brown from comment #2)
> Please note that the submitted test program seems not to meet the #include
> requirement as articulated in N4835 clause [expr.spaceship] p10:
>
> "10 The five comparison c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|gcc generates wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91828
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92433
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
That doesn't fix the spurious warning, though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91828
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92433
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92401
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92401
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Nov 9 17:09:44 2019
New Revision: 278004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/92401
* gimple-match-head.c (gimple_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92417
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92433
Bug ID: 92433
Summary: [10 regression] r276645 breaks bootstrap on powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92431
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly further reduced:
#include
constexpr std::weak_ordering
cmp(int e, int f)
{
return e <=> f;
}
auto o = cmp(1, 2);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92431
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92321
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] GCC 9.2.0 |[9 Regression] GCC 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92321
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Nov 9 14:54:19 2019
New Revision: 278003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit symbol for external BLAS routine when translating MATMUL to *GEMM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92432
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Kirchner ---
Non-STL test case:
struct X { int s(); };
template using Y = void;
template static constexpr void t(X x) { Y v; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92432
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Kirchner ---
Might be a duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87765
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92432
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe related to PR 86219.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92432
Bug ID: 92432
Summary: Regression: ICE on non-constant expression as template
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92321
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92431
Bug ID: 92431
Summary: ICE with spaceship in constexpr evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92426
--- Comment #2 from W E Brown ---
Please note that the submitted test program seems not to meet the #include
requirement as articulated in N4835 clause [expr.spaceship] p10:
"10 The five comparison category types (17.11.2) (the types
std::strong
33 matches
Mail list logo
