https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92221
Bug ID: 92221
Summary: [Regression] template argument deduction/substitution
failed after "Implement P0846R0, ADL and function
templates"
Product: gcc
Version: 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92220
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
No i think there is one case where what you said is incorrect. When both are
INT_MIN.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92220
Bug ID: 92220
Summary: -Wconversion generates a false warning for modulo
expression when the modulus has smaller type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92219
Bug ID: 92219
Summary: -Wconversion generates a false warning for modulo
expression when the modulus has smaller type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92213
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
/* The transfer function used by the DF equation solver to propagate
live info through block with BB_INDEX according to the following
equation:
bb.livein = (bb.liveout - bb.kill) OR bb.gen
*/
static boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92218
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92218
Bug ID: 92218
Summary: PowerPC indexed insn attribute misses some insns
(bswap, atomic, small int float memory)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92213
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
IRA has
; bb 2 artificial_defs: { }
;; bb 2 artificial_uses: { u0(6){ }u1(7){ }u2(16){ }u3(19){ }}
;; lr in5 [di] 6 [bp] 7 [sp] 16 [argp] 19 [frame]
;; lr use 5 [di] 6 [bp] 7 [sp] 16 [argp] 19 [fra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92217
Bug ID: 92217
Summary: compiler crash due to get_named_event_id not
initializing extra reallocated memory
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92134
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Untested fix:
--- a/gcc/cp/decl2.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.c
@@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ grokfield (const cp_declarator *declarator,
else
flags = LOOKUP_IMPLICIT;
+ if (decl_spec_seq_has_spec_p (declspecs, ds_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85678
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
This keeps getting brought up in bug 91766 (already added as related from the
other end)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to gcc-bugs from comment #6)
> I can confirm that this works from 9 and up. Is there any chance to backport
> it to 8?
That's why this bug is still open.
>
> In the ticket it says `Target Milesto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92215
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92216
Bug ID: 92216
Summary: GDC generate duplicate symbols when mixins and
interfaces are used to gather
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 84487, which changed state.
Bug 84487 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Large rodate section increase in 465.tonto
with r254427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613
Bug 84613 depends on bug 84487, which changed state.
Bug 84487 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Large rodate section increase in 465.tonto
with r254427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92115
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91962
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91812
--- Comment #13 from Gregory Fuchedzhy ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> Fixed.
Thanks a lot, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92215
Bug ID: 92215
Summary: flawed diagnostic for bit-field with non-integral type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92213
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 47108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47108&action=edit
A testcase
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 mask-2]$
/export/build/gnu/tools-build/gcc-tuning-debug/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/expo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92213
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92214
Bug ID: 92214
Summary: Unhelpful diagnostic for static_assert(
some_concept(some_type) )
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92143
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92212
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
See bugs 14030, 26732, 48091, 64526. Not sure how many bugs in this area
are genuinely different - I suspect a single bug could be considered to
cover the whole area of checking arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I'm 95%+ sure that this is a problem with qemu+newlib with the latter not
handling out-of-memory correctly. If I run the good program to the same
instruction that faults in the bad program, I see:
Breakp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92143
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 15:31:00 2019
New Revision: 277414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277414&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92143 adjust for OS X aligned_alloc behaviour
OS X 10.15 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92213
Bug ID: 92213
Summary: internal compiler error: in lra_assign, at
lra-assigns.c:1647
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92210
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92212
Bug ID: 92212
Summary: incompatible calls to K&R functions not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat unified.ii
template struct A;
class Vector {
template struct TypeIsGCThing {
template ::Type> using Vector = Vector;
struct B;
template class ContainerIter {
us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90682
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92059
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92143
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 14:13:48 2019
New Revision: 277400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277400&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92143 adjust for OS X aligned_alloc behaviour
OS X 10.15 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92059
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 14:13:25 2019
New Revision: 277396
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277396&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92059 fix several bugs in tr2::dynamic_bitset
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91962
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Fix:
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -7386,7 +7386,8 @@ convert_like_real (conversion *convs, tree expr, tree fn,
int argnum,
/* direct_reference_binding might have inserted a ck_qual under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92211
Bug ID: 92211
Summary: Lamdas in unevaluated context bug
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92210
Bug ID: 92210
Summary: no warning for invariable used in loop condition
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92209
Bug ID: 92209
Summary: Imprecise column number for -Wstrict-prototypes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90682
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:55:27 2019
New Revision: 277393
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277393&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90682 allow set_terminate(0) and set_unexpected(0)
Make the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:54:58 2019
New Revision: 277388
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277388&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/89164 enforce constraints for uninitialized algos
The memmo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91456
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91456
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:54:13 2019
New Revision: 277380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/91456 make INVOKE work with uncopyable prvalues
In C++17 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:55:21 2019
New Revision: 277392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61761 fix std::proj for targets without C99 cproj
The curr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92059
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92143
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:54:44 2019
New Revision: 277386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92143 adjust for OS X aligned_alloc behaviour
OS X 10.15 ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92059
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:53:55 2019
New Revision: 277376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92059 fix several bugs in tr2::dynamic_bitset
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90682
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92205
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:11:27 2019
New Revision: 277375
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277375&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92205
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766
--- Comment #12 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> This should be a global change and not just an aarch64 change. The reason
> is because then aarch64 is the odd man out when it comes to this.
Agreed, see https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85471
bin cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766
--- Comment #11 from Kamlesh Kumar ---
is this good?
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c b/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
index 0fffe60..9fead56 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
@@ -814,6 +814,10 @@ c_common_post_options (con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Target Milestone|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 24 11:23:54 2019
New Revision: 277374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277374&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92203
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
--- Comment #16 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 47107
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47107&action=edit
attachment-70446-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
--- Comment #15 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Your email was bounced...
-
... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh!
What to do next?
Well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 24 10:23:52 2019
New Revision: 277373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
It looks that we got partial saves of MS ABI functions all wrong.
According to Table 4 on page 10 of [1], the MS ABI callee saves only lower
128bit parts of XMM6 - XMM15. So, there is no guarantee that upper p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
When single-stepping in the r277178 executable, the final
=> 0x18bc0 <_malloc_r+1092>:str r3, [r2, #4]
succeeds and
(gdb) p /x $r2
$2 = 0x804aa40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #26 from Tamar Christina ---
> At least for this one there's the comment
> /* ??? At present we don't treat the int8_t and int16_t loops as
> reductions. */
>
> but I guess it's the same for the rest. You have to fixup the testc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
In particular, the execution continues after the last block dumped by qemu:
0x00018e40: e5974008 ldr r4, [r7, #8]
0x00018e44: e0898008 add r8, sb, r8
0x00018e48: e3888001 orr r8, r8, #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
>
> --- Comment #22 from Tamar Christina ---
> It also causes failures on AArch64.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Apart from the addresses used, the traces are identical right up until the
latter version crashes.
The testcase tries to allocate 128Mb+4bytes of memory, so my suspicion is that
this is a test that needs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 24 09:59:24 2019
New Revision: 277372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #21)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> > Author: rguenth
> > Date: Wed Oct 23 12:41:49 2019
> > New Revision: 277322
> >
> > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #22 from Tamar Christina ---
It also causes failures on AArch64.
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/reduc_2.c
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_7.c
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_5.c
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/reduc_1.c
I've also noti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88338
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 24 09:47:25 2019
New Revision: 277371
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277371&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88338 Implement P0898R3, C++20 concepts library
The impleme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 88338, which changed state.
Bug 88338 Summary: Implement P0898R3, C++20 concepts library.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88338
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92208
Bug ID: 92208
Summary: internal compile error, character array of dynamic
length returned from function and passed to subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 88338, which changed state.
Bug 88338 Summary: Implement P0898R3, C++20 concepts library.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88338
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88338
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|pr36449.C fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91812
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 24 09:38:56 2019
New Revision: 277370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91887
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 24 09:38:56 2019
New Revision: 277370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47104&action=edit
Execution trace for r277178
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47105&action=edit
Execution trace for r277179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47103
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47103&action=edit
Executable from r277179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47102
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47102&action=edit
Executable from r277178
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
Bug ID: 92207
Summary: pr36449.C fails on arm after r277179
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Kamlesh Kumar from comment #6)
> This Fixes it.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index 2e73f3515bb..155f4c45500 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> Author: rguenth
> Date: Wed Oct 23 12:41:49 2019
> New Revision: 277322
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277322&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 2019-10-23 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206
Bug ID: 92206
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at
cp/tree.c:1682 since r277281
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
--- Comment #14 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 47100
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47100&action=edit
attachment-36069-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 92174, which changed state.
Bug 92174 Summary: runtime error: index 15 out of bounds for type 'gfc_expr
*[15]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92174
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92174
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
