[Bug c++/92009] New: [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in is_really_empty_class)

2019-10-06 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
: Segmentation fault 8 | return ((void **) &typeid (int))[0]; | ^ 0xe6abc6 crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191006/work/gcc-10-20191006/gcc/toplev.c:326 0x80a407 tree_check(tree_node*, char const*, int, char

[Bug c++/92005] [10 Regression] switch code generation regression

2019-10-06 Thread pdimov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92005 --- Comment #2 from Peter Dimov --- r276416 makes -O2 inline less, and -O3 does fix this specific case. However, there appears to be some deeper issue here. I've reduced the number of cases from 10 to 5 for the example, but when I increase them b

[Bug c++/92005] [10 Regression] switch code generation regression

2019-10-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92005 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/92008] Build failure on cygwin

2019-10-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92008 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 47001 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47001&action=edit plural.i from adding -save-temps by hand to the Makefile in intl

[Bug target/92008] Build failure on cygwin

2019-10-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92008 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- If there's anything else needed, let me know. In the meantime, back to booting Linux :-)

[Bug target/92008] Build failure on cygwin

2019-10-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92008 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 47000 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47000&action=edit config.status

[Bug target/92008] New: Build failure on cygwin

2019-10-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92008 Bug ID: 92008 Summary: Build failure on cygwin Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug rtl-optimization/92007] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: EH edge crosses section boundary in bb 7)

2019-10-06 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007 Bug ID: 92007 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: EH edge crosses section boundary in bb 7) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/92006] storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable

2019-10-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/92006] storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable

2019-10-06 Thread urbanjost at comcast dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006 --- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- I expect the following call to storage_size() to return the value 80 whether called from within a select or not. I did not see the same issue with any other type, including a type such as ty

[Bug fortran/92006] New: storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable

2019-10-06 Thread urbanjost at comcast dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006 Bug ID: 92006 Summary: storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/91474] Internal compiler error when building mabi=32 mips64-elf cross-compiler: segfault in parallel_settings.cc

2019-10-06 Thread joey.dumont at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474 --- Comment #11 from Joey Dumont --- I can confirm that this revision fixes the issue. I'll try to lookout for the gcc-9 version where this will be released. Thank you!

[Bug c++/92005] New: switch code generation regression

2019-10-06 Thread pdimov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92005 Bug ID: 92005 Summary: switch code generation regression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ As

[Bug bootstrap/92002] [10 regression] -Wuninitialized warning in gcc/wide-int.cc

2019-10-06 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- It is patch enabling auto-inlining at -O2, so we have another false positive I guess. I fixed couple of them which reproduced during x86-64 bootstrap for me.

[Bug bootstrap/92002] [10 regression] -Wuninitialized warning in gcc/wide-int.cc

2019-10-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1