https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try -fno-common.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91767
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
If anything, one of the general_scalar_chain objects is not being constructed
correctly.
That is:
hash_map defs_map;
not being done correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82391
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Thomas, could you update this PR with the current state?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91729
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91566
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 13 20:19:40 2019
New Revision: 275704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275704&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-13 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91566
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91767
Bug ID: 91767
Summary: After r274953, clang-compiled xgcc segfaults during
RTL pass: stv
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91708
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Sep 13 17:22:04 2019
New Revision: 275701
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-13 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/91708
* c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91764
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766
Bug ID: 91766
Summary: -fvisibility=hidden during -fpic still uses GOT
indirection on arm64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91765
Bug ID: 91765
Summary: -Wredundant-decls conflicts with
__attribute__((alias))
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91764
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
That should use grep -E and ERE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:34:11AM +, juergen.reuter at desy dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91764
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91764
Bug ID: 91764
Summary: [10 regression] libgo build broken with Solaris grep
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91756
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The disambiguation needs "translation" (vn_reference_lookup_3 using the
original
ref for path-based disambiguation), but we do not allow this when looking
across backedges in the maybe_skip_until walk and th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 46880
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46880&action=edit
prototype
This improves code-gen to use pextrw where possible but that doesn't make any
measurable difference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > lower-subreg should have be able to help here. I wonder why it did not
> > > .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91749
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, the known-to-work is a bit misleading here.
Anyway, the cross compiler is configured like this:
$ ~/BIG/bin/arm/dev/shm/buildbot/install/gcc/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Sep 13 11:33:18 2019
New Revision: 275698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-13 Bernd Edlinger
PR fortran/91716
* trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91761
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #4)
> But GCC 5.5 could remove one malloc-free pair
> https://godbolt.org/z/fDJZs0
>
> New optimization in gcc 6 actually made the code worse..
But the code is unde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91763
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91763
Bug ID: 91763
Summary: [10 regression] go.go-torture/execute/printnil.go
FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91761
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> See the documentation. -fallow-invalid-boz reduces the error to a warning.
> The warning can only be silenced by -w. This was done with intent.
Actually not all of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91749
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
29 matches
Mail list logo
