https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91717
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91717
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 13 05:41:01 2019
New Revision: 275696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91717
* dependency.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > lower-subreg should have be able to help here. I wonder why it did not ...
>
> I'm not sure how it can help.
I think y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91762
Bug ID: 91762
Summary: OpenMP omp target exit data directive not working with
gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91761
Sergey Krasnitsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Sergey Kra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #2 from Wilc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91761
Bug ID: 91761
Summary: Overloaded new operator compiled with -O3 option
distorts original C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 46877
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46877&action=edit
untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91557
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88339
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 46876
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46876&action=edit
Partial implementation of
This patch adds an incomplete and untested header. This depends on my
implementat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88339
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91760
Bug ID: 91760
Summary: Trailing return type breaks final specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89386
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 12 19:18:25 2019
New Revision: 275689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89386
* config/i386/sse.md (s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91759
Bug ID: 91759
Summary: g++ accepts ill-formed deduction guides in wrong scope
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91758
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91758
Bug ID: 91758
Summary: Clang fails to pass validation after r261089
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91747
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Is this worth backporting to gcc-7-branch for the final 7.x release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91757
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91757
Bug ID: 91757
Summary: Function block scope thread_local variable with unique
global symbol linkage is not unique at run-time.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628
--- Comment #14 from Carlos O'Donell ---
My preference for would be a distinct *.S file as Florian suggests, it's the
most robust solution.
The only other alternative I would consider is a new __builtin_get_tls_offset()
that does what you want,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91756
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91756
Bug ID: 91756
Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/lto/alias-3 FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91719
--- Comment #10 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
xchg is faster than mov+mfence on AMD Zen. We can add m_ZNVER1 | m_ZNVER2 to
the tuning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91755
Bug ID: 91755
Summary: C++ handling of extended characters is not 100%
correct
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #18 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:23:54AM +, manfred99 at gmx dot ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
>
> --- Comment #17 from Manfred Schwarb ---
> Here is the documentation fallout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91754
Bug ID: 91754
Summary: [c++2a] Defining member function outside of class body
fails to compile when containing class is templated on
class-type NTTP
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91717
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Yes it is - the .false. on entry comes about because the allocatable
component must be deallocated on entry to scope. The reallocation on
assignment takes care of the rest.
Cheers
Pau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42730|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #9 from Diego Franco ---
Correction/editing of last section of former comment:
...
- init brace does not work for user defined conversion reference WITHOUT static
cast:
A a {};
const std::vector& b {a}; // changed from "auto" to "st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
Bug ID: 91753
Summary: Bad register allocation of multi-register types
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #8 from Diego Franco ---
So to summarize, these are the main reason why I believe this should be
addressed:
- init brace works for references of any type:
std::vector a {};
std::vector& b {a};
assert(&a == &b); // works
int c {};
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91750
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 12 12:48:43 2019
New Revision: 275685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91750
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Yes, that would work, but the better workaroud is to replace
h = B"11"
by
h = int (B"11")
I convinced the authors of the software we depend upon to do that accordingly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91752
Bug ID: 91752
Summary: BOZ constant outside DATA/INT/REAL/DBLE/CMPLX flagged
as error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91748
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Sep 12 10:51:58 2019
New Revision: 275684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/91748 fix std::for_each_n for random access iterators
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91748
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Sep 12 10:51:39 2019
New Revision: 275683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/91748 fix std::for_each_n for random access iterators
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kharlamov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> The advantage of showing the location of the constructor is that you can see
> which object is being destroyed. If the location was shown as the end of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The advantage of showing the location of the constructor is that you can see
which object is being destroyed. If the location was shown as the end of the
scope, all local variables would show the same locat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there are a few dups of this bug.
What happens is the call to deconstructor's line is the same as the object
line; rather than the end of the scope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
Bug ID: 91751
Summary: In backtrace, calls to c++ destructors are shown way
afar from the actual place
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91717
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-09/msg00027.html
fixes the ICE and the test
type core
character (len=:), allocatable :: msg
end type
type(core) :: my_core
print *, alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89386
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 12 09:59:58 2019
New Revision: 275682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Vectorise multiply high with scaling operations (PR 8938
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91686
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46871|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #17 from Manfred Schwarb ---
Here is the documentation fallout I mentioned, previous attachment.
And probably a lot of
@multitable @columnfractions .20 .20 .20 .25
entries should be widened for the last column, as "Fortran 77 and la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #16 from Manfred Schwarb ---
Created attachment 46873
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46873&action=edit
documentation changes for conversion intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91686
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 12 09:05:14 2019
New Revision: 275681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91686
Backport from ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91750
Bug ID: 91750
Summary: Induction vectorization introduces signed overflows
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
flag_unsafe_math_optimizations "trumps" everything to some extent, so yes,
I'd say -funsafe-math-optimizations -frounding-math doesn't make much sense.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91712
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> Should be fixed by SVN revision 275648 (I forgot to add the PR reference to
> the
> commit message).
It is indeed, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
65 matches
Mail list logo
