[Bug c++/91590] ICE in : canonical types differ for identical types std::enable_if::ViewConcept< >()> and std::enable_if::ViewConcept< >()

2019-09-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91590 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/53075] -Werror=pedantic should be equivalent to -pedantic-errors

2019-09-01 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53075 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/91625] FAIL: gcc.dg/strlenopt-68.c execution test

2019-09-01 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91625 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/91129] [9 Regression] Implicit casts fail for modulo operator

2019-09-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91129 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91129] [9 Regression] Implicit casts fail for modulo operator

2019-09-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91129 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sun Sep 1 22:59:10 2019 New Revision: 275286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275286&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91129 - wrong error with binary op in template argument.

[Bug c++/91129] [9 Regression] Implicit casts fail for modulo operator

2019-09-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91129 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] Implicit |[9 Regression] Implicit

[Bug c++/91129] [9/10 Regression] Implicit casts fail for modulo operator

2019-09-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91129 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sun Sep 1 22:54:15 2019 New Revision: 275285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275285&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91129 - wrong error with binary op in template argument.

[Bug middle-end/91631] buffer overflow into an array member of a declared object not detected

2019-09-01 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91631 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/91631] New: buffer overflow into an array member of a declared object not detected

2019-09-01 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91631 Bug ID: 91631 Summary: buffer overflow into an array member of a declared object not detected Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/82645] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strncpy overflowing a member array

2019-09-01 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82645 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/88204] New test case 26_numerics/complex/operators/more_constexpr.cc from r266416 fails

2019-09-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88204 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

2019-09-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #22 from Thomas Koenig --- A problem with such code is that type violations like that are likely to cause actual wrong code issues because much of the aliasing analysis is type based... What I could do is to a) restrict the number o

[Bug objc/90709] [meta-bug] GNU Objective C (C++) cannot consume current headers on Darwin platforms.

2019-09-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Sep 1 19:30:35 2019 New Revision: 275281 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275281&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [objective-c/c++, testsuite] Workaround for PR90709. Since we cannot parse

[Bug gcov-profile/91087] g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C fails everywhere on Darwin.

2019-09-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Sep 1 19:17:16 2019 New Revision: 275279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275279&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Address PR91087 - XFAIL parts of pr16855.C. The testcas

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-09-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 --- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Sep 1 18:57:42 2019 New Revision: 275276 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275276&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Backport fix for fails of pr90020.c. To allow weak ref

[Bug c++/85125] constant expression with const_cast UB does not emit error

2019-09-01 Thread john at mcfarlane dot name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85125 --- Comment #7 from John McFarlane --- Confirmed. Thank you! On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 15:02, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85125 > > Marek Polacek changed: > >

[Bug fortran/91589] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2447

2019-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91589 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/55930] [7/8/9/10 Regression] libatomic build failure if configured with --disable-dependency-tracking

2019-09-01 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/91626] [9/10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr48622 c_lto_pr48622_0.o-c_lto_pr48622_0.o link, -O -flto -finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining

2019-09-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91626 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/91623] [7/8/9 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

2019-09-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- For the missed constant folding, it seems that we end up in fold_vec_perm, with type a vector of "long long", while arg0 and arg1 are vectors of "long", and we give up because of the early check "TREE_TYPE (TRE

[Bug lto/91626] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr48622 c_lto_pr48622_0.o-c_lto_pr48622_0.o link, -O -flto -finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining

2019-09-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91626 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Test fails first in r263988.

[Bug lto/91626] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr48622 c_lto_pr48622_0.o-c_lto_pr48622_0.o link, -O -flto -finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining

2019-09-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91626 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 46796 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46796&action=edit Difference in gcc-dg-lto-pr48622-01.exe.ltrans0.s between r263987 and r263988 The hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 targe

[Bug lto/91572] [9 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

2019-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[9/10 Regression

[Bug middle-end/91623] [7/8/9 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

2019-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9/10 Regression] |[7/8/9 Regression] -msse4.1

[Bug target/91472] [8/9/10 Regression] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-09-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91472 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91472] [8/9/10 Regression] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-09-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
/sparc.c (sparc_cannot_force_const_mem): Return true during LRA/reload in PIC mode if the PIC register hasn't been used yet. (sparc_pic_register_p): Test reload_in_progress for consistency's sake. Added: branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190901-1.c

[Bug target/91472] [8/9/10 Regression] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-09-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
/sparc.c (sparc_cannot_force_const_mem): Return true during LRA/reload in PIC mode if the PIC register hasn't been used yet. (sparc_pic_register_p): Test reload_in_progress for consistency's sake. Added: branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190901-1.c

[Bug target/91472] [8/9/10 Regression] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-09-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
/sparc.c (sparc_cannot_force_const_mem): Return true during LRA/reload in PIC mode if the PIC register hasn't been used yet. (sparc_pic_register_p): Test reload_in_progress for consistency's sake. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190901-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/C

[Bug middle-end/91623] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

2019-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Sep 1 11:57:10 2019 New Revision: 275267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275267&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91623 * optabs.c (expand_vec_cond_expr): If

[Bug lto/91572] [9/10 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

2019-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Sep 1 11:56:13 2019 New Revision: 275266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275266&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/91572 * tree.c (find_decls_types_in_node): Also wal

[Bug rtl-optimization/91154] [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell caused by r272922

2019-09-01 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 --- Comment #37 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On September 1, 2019 12:05:52 PM GMT+02:00, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 > >--- Comment #36 from Uroš Bizjak --- >(In reply to Richard Bien

[Bug rtl-optimization/91154] [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell caused by r272922

2019-09-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 --- Comment #36 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30) > Hmm, it regresses the gcc.target/i386/minmax-6.c though and thus cactusADM > (IIRC). I was looking a bit into minmax6.c failure. Apparently, despite spill/fill

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-01 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- yes that looks very likely. I was not able to reproduce this particular failure, but you can try out the patch I attached to pr91612 and see if it fixes you problem. I am currently short of test capability a

[Bug libstdc++/91630] New: std::any SFINAE breaks valid code since 9.1

2019-09-01 Thread alabuzhev at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91630 Bug ID: 91630 Summary: std::any SFINAE breaks valid code since 9.1 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libst

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-01 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

2019-09-01 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #18 from Florian Weimer --- I'm going to request a CVE ID for this.