https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79861
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84911
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #0)
> In aarch64.c:
>
> error ("invalid name (\"%s\") in % pragma or
> attribute", str);
>
>
> Please use %qs instead of "%s"
I'd think -Wformat-diag should ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79870
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@3am-software.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2)
> Actually, it's not config-list.ml, though I did use that to help generate
> the list of targets I am testing. None of them ones I'm testing would fall
> into th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42686
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41731
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91537
--- Comment #3 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> Comment on attachment 46748 [details]
> Leak demonstration program
>
> Here's the output on current trunk:
>
> 862548
> 8725
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91539
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91390
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 24 21:12:45 2019
New Revision: 274902
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274902&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91390
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 24 21:12:45 2019
New Revision: 274902
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274902&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91390
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88944
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
Hi Eric, Just ran
gcc (Compiler-Explorer-Build) 10.0.0 20190823 (experimental)
on godbolt.org, but it didn't suggest stdbool.h
https://godbolt.org/z/Bn_o7f
Does it work for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91539
--- Comment #2 from Devin Matthews ---
Indeed the suppression of FMA is from -std=c99 and not the pragma. Sorry for
the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91540
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Zaitsev ---
Godbolt playground: https://godbolt.org/z/MFSH1D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91540
Bug ID: 91540
Summary: Missed optimization: simplification CFG
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91533
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91539
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91539
Bug ID: 91539
Summary: #pragma omp simd disables -ffp-contract=fast
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91520
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
hmm BZ autodetected "mbox" for the attachment .. it should also be applicable
as a regular diff.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91520
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 46749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46749&action=edit
Possible fix by modifying GCC output.
As noted, the LLVM backend is rejecting a disambiguation marker that is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91538
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91538
Bug ID: 91538
Summary: ICE with generic lambda.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91537
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Comment on attachment 46748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46748
Leak demonstration program
Here's the output on current trunk:
862548
872548
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Simply passing on a huge number of arguments is not enough to trigger this.
Here's a perl script to generate test cases:
while ($n=shift)
{
open FOO, ">foo-$n.f90";
print FOO <
26 matches
Mail list logo
