[Bug tree-optimization/91514] optimization needs ficktive memory allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, openmp

[Bug target/91518] [9/10 Regression] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/91510] r253207 fixed a wrong-code bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91510 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 46742 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46742&action=edit original testcase Original testcase.

[Bug target/78176] [MIPS] miscompiles ldxc1 with large pointers on 32-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to James Cowgill from comment #0) > Before the ldxc1 instruction is executed, gdb reports that the values in v0 > and s0 are both large integers (above 0x8000): > (gdb) print/x $v0 > $1 = 0xff

[Bug fortran/91519] [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > We need the Fortran source not the *.mod file. You can use samp.f90.

[Bug fortran/91519] [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80078] Incorrect classification of address of volatile as not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80078 Christopher Head changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91519] [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- It was ok two weeks ago, new regression from August 10th

[Bug fortran/91519] [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- It needs two *.mod* file which is too large for attachment. So I put them in github, refer to https://github.com/algebra84/521.wrf_r

[Bug fortran/91519] [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Created attachment 46741 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46741&action=edit module_comm_dm_3.mod

[Bug fortran/91519] New: [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91519 Bug ID: 91519 Summary: [regression]ICE error in 521.wrf_r Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug preprocessor/91517] Pragma expansion in variadic macro reorders pragmas and breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91517 --- Comment #2 from Peter Boyle --- GCC preprocessor moves location of _Pragma operator in sequence in a variadic macro: Simpler case: #define thread_for( i, num, ... ) for ( uint64_t i=0;i" # 1 "" # 1 "tmp.cc" #pragma omp critical # 3 "tmp.cc

[Bug lto/91518] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518 --- Comment #1 from Xiong Hu XS Luo --- 51e85e64e125803502fde94b9e22037c0ccaa8b2 is the first bad commit commit 51e85e64e125803502fde94b9e22037c0ccaa8b2 Author: rguenth rguenth@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 Date: Mon Aug 27 10:55:53 2018 +

[Bug lto/91518] New: segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518 Bug ID: 91518 Summary: segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/91517] Pragma expansion in variadic macro reorders pragmas and breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91517 --- Comment #1 from Peter Boyle --- Also occurs on 7.4.0, 8.3.0 gcc-7 (Homebrew GCC 7.4.0_2) 7.4.0 gcc-8 (Homebrew GCC 8.3.0) 8.3.0

[Bug tree-optimization/91504] Inlining misses some logical operation folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91504 --- Comment #3 from Kamlesh Kumar --- diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd index 93dcef9..b62ef36 100644 --- a/gcc/match.pd +++ b/gcc/match.pd @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT) (pointer_plus integer_zerop @1) (non_

[Bug tree-optimization/91504] Inlining misses some logical operation folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91504 Kamlesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug lto/91273] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273 --- Comment #8 from Xiong Hu XS Luo --- SPEC2017 case 507.cactuBSSN_r, also has ICE failure from r273571: lto1: internal compiler error: in warn_types_mismatch, at ipa-devirt.c:995 0x105dad1f warn_types_mismatch(tree_node*, tree_node*, unsigned

[Bug libstdc++/91516] Please also export the base object constructor for __shared_ptr;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91516 --- Comment #1 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- Corresponding clang bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43079

[Bug c++/91448] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/flifetime-dse2.C -std=gnu++98 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux11.11 Host

[Bug preprocessor/91517] New: Pragma expansion in variadic macro reorders pragmas and breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91517 Bug ID: 91517 Summary: Pragma expansion in variadic macro reorders pragmas and breaks code Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/91489] misplaced stack pointer when __ms_hook_prologue__ attribute is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91489 --- Comment #1 from Paul Gofman --- Created attachment 46739 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46739&action=edit Pop frame pointer in function label if it is not needed instead of prologue for "ms_hook_prologue" functions on i3

[Bug libstdc++/91516] New: Please also export the base object constructor for __shared_ptr;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91516 Bug ID: 91516 Summary: Please also export the base object constructor for __shared_ptr; Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #4 from Sunil Pandey --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3) > (In reply to Sunil Pandey from comment #2) > > > phase opt and generate : 47.72 ( 97%) 0.24 ( 77%) 48.04 ( > > 96%) 118205 kB ( 89%) > > So, ph

[Bug fortran/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Summary|Fortran compile

[Bug middle-end/91490] [9/10 Regression] bogus argument missing terminating nul warning on strlen of a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- A subset of the patch referenced in comment #1 that deals with just this issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01517.html

[Bug c/91515] New: missed optimization: no tailcall for types of class MEMORY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91515 Bug ID: 91515 Summary: missed optimization: no tailcall for types of class MEMORY Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/88839] [SVE] Poor implementation of blend-like permutes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88839 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Wed Aug 21 20:41:41 2019 New Revision: 274810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274810&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-22 Prathamesh Kulkarni

[Bug c/91514] New: optimization needs ficktive memory allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91514 Bug ID: 91514 Summary: optimization needs ficktive memory allocation Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug bootstrap/65725] Bootstrap errors on Solaris 10 x86-64, including object diffs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65725 Daniel Richard G. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91513] New: Non-standard terminology in error message for pointer component assignment in pure procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91513 Bug ID: 91513 Summary: Non-standard terminology in error message for pointer component assignment in pure procedure Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/91512] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #2 from Sunil Pandey --- Before commit time report: == $ /local/skpandey/gccwork/gcc_trunk/tools-build/gcc-debug/release.a4ba5c3ec624008e899a8bcb687359db25140c23/usr/gcc-10.0.0-x86-64/bin/gfortran -m64 -c -o

[Bug target/83531] Build broken on macOS 10.13.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83531 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe --- fixed for 9.3

[Bug target/83531] Build broken on macOS 10.13.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83531 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Wed Aug 21 19:18:14 2019 New Revision: 274807 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274807&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, fixincludes] Backport fix for PR83531 There is no reasonable chan

[Bug fortran/91512] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- Can you show the output of your compilation when adding -ftime-report to the options? This will give us an idea of where the CPU cycles are burned.

[Bug target/90724] ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724 --- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Wed Aug 21 18:34:43 2019 New Revision: 274805 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274805&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-21 Prathamesh Kulkarni PR

[Bug middle-end/91490] [9/10 Regression] bogus argument missing terminating nul warning on strlen of a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78176] [MIPS] miscompiles ldxc1 with large pointers on 32-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176 --- Comment #27 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Yes, it is the same problem, the same address calculation occurs here, and the lack of 32-bit address space wraparound is a part of the n32 Linux ABI, which implies support for processors that do not sup

[Bug fortran/91512] New: Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 Bug ID: 91512 Summary: Fortran compile time regression. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/78176] [MIPS] miscompiles ldxc1 with large pointers on 32-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176 --- Comment #26 from Thomas De Schampheleire --- (In reply to Thomas De Schampheleire from comment #25) > Is it possible that this same problem is applicable on the 'lwx' instruction? > I am using MIPS64 n32. > > I first saw the original problem

[Bug target/78176] [MIPS] miscompiles ldxc1 with large pointers on 32-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176 --- Comment #25 from Thomas De Schampheleire --- Is it possible that this same problem is applicable on the 'lwx' instruction? I am using MIPS64 n32. I first saw the original problem as described in this bug with instruction 'lwxc1'. I then used

[Bug c++/91304] maybe_unused attribute ignored on variable declared in if declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91304 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/91314] Confusing warning refers to nonexistent comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91314 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91505] [10 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at tree.h:3896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c/61727] #pragma simd is undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fx at gnu dot org --- Comment #5 from Er

[Bug other/91511] documentation of the effect of #pragma omp simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91511 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/91505] [10 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at tree.h:3896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Aug 21 13:59:31 2019 New Revision: 274799 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274799&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [C++] Protect call to copy_attributes_to_builtin (PR9150

[Bug tree-optimization/91510] r253207 fixed a wrong-code bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91510] r253207 fixed a wrong-code bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91510 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 21 13:44:45 2019 New Revision: 274798 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274798&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-21 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91510

[Bug c++/91304] maybe_unused attribute ignored on variable declared in if declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91304 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ipa/91508] [9 Regression] Segfault due to referencing removed cgraph_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91508 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0, 8.3.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/91508] Segfault due to referencing removed cgraph_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91508 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/91511] New: documentation of the effect of #pragma omp simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91511 Bug ID: 91511 Summary: documentation of the effect of #pragma omp simd Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug c++/91505] [10 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at tree.h:3896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > >This should fix it: > > Except it is wrong. > builtin_decl_explicit should be only used with BUILT_IN_NORMAL class. I wish it would say so then; it only checks

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Look in the gcc sources, under gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c .

[Bug tree-optimization/88240] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Potential optimization bug: invalid pre-load of floating-point value could cause SIGFPE-underflow if value is integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91510] r253207 fixed a wrong-code bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91482] __builtin_assume_aligned should not break write combining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91482 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 21 11:45:34 2019 New Revision: 274796 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274796&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-21 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91482

[Bug tree-optimization/91482] __builtin_assume_aligned should not break write combining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91482 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91510] New: r253207 fixed a wrong-code bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91510 Bug ID: 91510 Summary: r253207 fixed a wrong-code bug Product: gcc Version: 7.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug lto/50483] lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Btw, I consistently do _not_ see HIDDEN here. BFD issue?

[Bug c++/91505] [10 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at tree.h:3896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug rtl-optimization/91509] -fprefetch-loop-arrays and LTO causes memory usage compiling wrf to go through the roof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91509 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto, memory-hog Target|

[Bug rtl-optimization/91509] New: -fprefetch-loop-arrays and LTO causes memory usage compiling wrf to go through the roof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91509 Bug ID: 91509 Summary: -fprefetch-loop-arrays and LTO causes memory usage compiling wrf to go through the roof Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug ipa/91508] New: Segfault due to referencing removed cgraph_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91508 Bug ID: 91508 Summary: Segfault due to referencing removed cgraph_node Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10) >> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/minmax-7.c scan-assembler pminsd >> >> Not for me. I've used -ma

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 --- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 46737 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46737&action=edit Patch for 32-bit Solaris/x86 failures

[Bug rtl-optimization/91503] ICE ira-build.i:17:1: error: shared rtx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91503 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 21 08:44:59 2019 New Revision: 274792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-21 Richard Biener PR target/91498 PR targe

[Bug rtl-optimization/91503] ICE ira-build.i:17:1: error: shared rtx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91503 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91505] [10 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at tree.h:3896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/91504] Inlining misses some logical operation folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91504 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/91503] ICE ira-build.i:17:1: error: shared rtx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91503 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91502] suboptimal atomic_fetch_sub and atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91502 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/91507] wrong debug for completed array with previous incomplete declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91507 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug CC|

[Bug d/91339] libphobos: ftbfs when the path contains '~'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91339 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/88722] :1: internal compiler error: in register_moduleinfo, at d/modules.cc:40 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88722 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw --- The ICE is no more as of r274769, but phobos still can't be built. Adding support for targets without targetm_common.have_named_sections could be tracked in a separate PR.

[Bug debug/91507] New: wrong debug for completed array with previous incomplete declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91507 Bug ID: 91507 Summary: wrong debug for completed array with previous incomplete declaration Product: gcc Version: 7.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/90444] internal compiler error: in d_init_builtins, at d/d-builtins.cc:1121

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90444 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/90445] internal compiler error: in d_build_c_type_nodes, at d/d-builtins.cc:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90445 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/90446] ICE: Segmentation fault in build_function_type at gcc/tree.c:8539

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90446 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/91339] libphobos: ftbfs when the path contains '~'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91339 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Wed Aug 21 07:54:06 2019 New Revision: 274771 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274771&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR d/91339 d/dmd: Merge upstream dmd b37a537d3 Fixe

[Bug d/88722] :1: internal compiler error: in register_moduleinfo, at d/modules.cc:40 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88722 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Wed Aug 21 07:53:44 2019 New Revision: 274769 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274769&root=gcc&view=rev Log: d: Partially fix ICE: in register_moduleinfo, at d/modules.c

[Bug d/90446] ICE: Segmentation fault in build_function_type at gcc/tree.c:8539

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90446 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Wed Aug 21 07:53:25 2019 New Revision: 274767 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274767&root=gcc&view=rev Log: d: Fix ICE: Segmentation fault in build_function_type at gcc

[Bug d/90444] internal compiler error: in d_init_builtins, at d/d-builtins.cc:1121

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90444 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Wed Aug 21 07:53:05 2019 New Revision: 274765 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274765&root=gcc&view=rev Log: d: Fix internal compiler error: in d_init_builtins, at d/d-b

[Bug d/90445] internal compiler error: in d_build_c_type_nodes, at d/d-builtins.cc:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90445 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Wed Aug 21 07:53:15 2019 New Revision: 274766 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274766&root=gcc&view=rev Log: d: Fix internal compiler error: in d_build_c_type_nodes, at

[Bug tree-optimization/91491] [9 Regression] glib2.0 build not working when built with -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91491 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10) > > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/minmax-7.c scan-assembler pminsd > > Not for me. I've used -march=haswell in all of these testcases to > rule out ISA and cost iss

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 > > Arseny Solokha changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/91503] ICE ira-build.i:17:1: error: shared rtx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91503 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Untested patch to fix this issue. 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c | 2 ++ modified gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c @@ -707,6 +707,8 @@ general_scalar_chain::make_vector_copies

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 > > Rainer Orth changed: > >What|Removed |Added > ---