https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90601
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90601
--- Comment #3 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sun Aug 11 06:53:14 2019
New Revision: 274263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274263&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
d: Fix ICE: gimplification failed (gimplify.c at 13436)
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41492
felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
This patch seems to fix the problem. It follows cp_parser_lambda_body in its
handling of function_depth.
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -28934,6 +28934,8 @@ cp_parser_late_parsing_for_member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
This sort of problem, accidentally collecting live data, is typically fixed by
adding
++function_depth;
// whatever
--function_depth;
Here we're in cp_parser_late_parsing_for_member, which calls
start_prepar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
Bug ID: 91419
Summary: [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c,
ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91418
--- Comment #1 from Darrell Wright ---
The template isn't part of it,
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/KCok90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91417
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91418
Bug ID: 91418
Summary: Nested class of templated class cannot declare parent
class friend
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
761003.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 10.0.0 20190810 (experimental) [trunk revision 274249]
(powerpc-apple-darwin9) GCC error:|
| in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532 |
| Error detected around c761003
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87438
--- Comment #2 from Zach van Rijn ---
Using GCC 8-20180706 snapshot,
gcc -c -O2 -fPIC grapes.c
during RTL pass: reload
grapes.c: In function 'smaxval_r8':
grapes.c:57:1: internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1155
}
^
0x408422
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87438
--- Comment #1 from Zach van Rijn ---
Created attachment 46699
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46699&action=edit
Test case. Triggers bug on 8.x to at least 10-20190721.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
This is where we free the memory occupied by the parsed attribute:
(gdb) bt
#0 __memset_avx2_unaligned_erms () at
../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:180
#1 0x00c8e052 in poison
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
I suppose an assert could be generated to avoid running the test on hppa64,
but this is a compiler ICE and the error shouldn't occur.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91413
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|---
Summary|[10 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
__attribute__ ((unused)) const struct S {
S() { }
} s;
ICEs with --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to p.vanh...@oma.be from comment #0)
> Unfortunately this appears to be a heisenbug. I tried generating the
> preprocessed file with -save-temps, but the ICE goes away when using that
> file (or eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
Bug ID: 91416
Summary: ICE in cp_check_const_attributes, at cp/decl2.c:1408
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91413
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91359
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
I think this is
P0145R3 Refining Expression Evaluation Order for Idiomatic C++
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0145r3.pdf
which says
4. A SOLUTION
In summary, the following expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase also with PMF:
struct S { int a[10]; void bar (); void baz (); };
typedef void (S::*pmf) ();
void
foo (int i, int x[10][10], int y[10], struct S z[10], struct S *w[10], pmf
u[10])
{
int b = x[i++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.c.jj 2019-07-30 08:27:49.987555303 +0200
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c 2019-08-10 18:13:20.821949299 +0200
@@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ verify_tree (tree x, struct tlist **pbef
case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Egorushkin ---
gcc-9.1 produces the same warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415
Bug ID: 91415
Summary: Invalid warning for C++17 sequencing of shift operator
E1<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91238
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Fixed in trunk in r274253.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91238
--- Comment #5 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sat Aug 10 14:11:49 2019
New Revision: 274253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
d: Fix internal compiler error: in add_expr, at tree.c:7794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414
Bug ID: 91414
Summary: Improved PRNG
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91413
Bug ID: 91413
Summary: [F2018]: Procedures are recursive by default;
switching from stack to static allocation is not safe
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Aug 10 10:13:52 2019
New Revision: 274251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/91408
* config/i386/mmx.md (usadv8qi): Use regis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On August 10, 2019 4:22:25 AM GMT+02:00, peter at cordes dot ca
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
>
>Peter Cordes changed:
>
> What|Removed
39 matches
Mail list logo
