[Bug tree-optimization/91280] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_component_ref, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3259 since r260354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91280] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_component_ref, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3259 since r260354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280 Bug ID: 91280 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_component_ref, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3259 since r260354 Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug c/91279] New: [10 Regression] gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "linemap_ordinary_map_lookup"

er Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 10.0.0 20190727 (experimental) [trunk revision 273844] (GCC)

[Bug c++/91278] New: Array arithmetic yields "is not a constant expression" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91278 Bug ID: 91278 Summary: Array arithmetic yields "is not a constant expression" error Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/88227] ICE in gfc_convert_boz, at fortran/target-memory.c:788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/91270] ice during GIMPLE pass: dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91270 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- 273788 seems fine, so range is 273788 to 273800.

[Bug c++/91270] ice during GIMPLE pass: dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91270 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > Does this patch fix it for you? > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01644.html Sadly, no. bug538.cc script.cc: In member function ‘void CInputScript

[Bug c++/91277] New: est.cpp:5:55: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91277 Bug ID: 91277 Summary: est.cpp:5:55: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206 Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug other/91276] New: Doc typos in __builtin_crypto_vpmsum*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91276 Bug ID: 91276 Summary: Doc typos in __builtin_crypto_vpmsum* Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug target/91275] New: __builtin_crypto_vpmsumd gives different results -O[123] vs -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91275 Bug ID: 91275 Summary: __builtin_crypto_vpmsumd gives different results -O[123] vs -O0 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91264] modifying const-qual object in constexpr context not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91264 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/91268] [10 Regression] adaint.c:38: warning: "_REENTRANT" redefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91268 --- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Another new issue: In file included from ../../gcc/gcc/ada/adadecode.c:35: ../../gcc/gcc/ada/adadecode.c: In function 'void __gnat_decode(const char*, char *, int)': ../../gcc/gcc/ada/adadecode.

[Bug c++/85137] [concepts] ICE with undeclared concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|paolo.carlini at

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #112 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Hi Cameron, We have to fix bootstrap compiler so we have a working g++ with one only (.weak) support. I think the offset in the branch relocation possibly comes from the fact that on ia64-hpu

[Bug target/91274] New: vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Bug ID: 91274 Summary: vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug lto/91273] New: [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273 Bug ID: 91273 Summary: [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:995 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug lto/91273] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/91272] New: [SVE] Use fully-masked loops for CLASTB reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91272 Bug ID: 91272 Summary: [SVE] Use fully-masked loops for CLASTB reductions Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/91166] [SVE] Unfolded ZIPs of constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91166 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/88833] [SVE] Redundant moves for WHILELO-based loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88833 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/88838] [SVE] Use 32-bit WHILELO in LP64 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88838 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/88837] [SVE] Poor vector construction code in VL-specific mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88837 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug middle-end/91242] ICE on aarch64 SVE tests - gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_[146].c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91242 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug c++/91271] class template specialization on std::array failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91271 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- std::array uses size_t, not int, as second parameter. I didn't check what the standard says about this.

[Bug c++/91271] New: class template specialization on std::array failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91271 Bug ID: 91271 Summary: class template specialization on std::array failed Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/91270] ice during GIMPLE pass: dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91270 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from Marc

[Bug c++/91270] New: ice during GIMPLE pass: dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91270 Bug ID: 91270 Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: dce Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee