https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #104 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-25 8:46 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #103 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2019-07-25 7:27 p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #103 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-25 7:27 p.m., elowe at elowe dot com wrote:
> According to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
>
> comment 6
>
> "As far as I can tell all g++ versions available for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
r273783 makes this work on x86_64 (and other targets with relaxed alignment)
and sparc-solaris11 (and other strictly aligned targets) where the strlen call
in g() still isn't folded. The difference is this be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91264
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Another test:
constexpr void
f (int &r)
{
r = 99;
}
constexpr int
f2 ()
{
const int i = 0;
f (const_cast(i));
return i;
}
constexpr int i = f2 ();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #102 from EML ---
> Can 4.7.4 rebuild itself? It not, it's probably somewhat broken. Need to
> figure out whether it
> is good enough to build stage1 at -O0. I think the early faults at -O2/-O1
> should be looked at to see
> if th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #101 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-25 8:46 a.m., cameron.heide at betasystems dot com wrote:
> Looks like it's PHSS_34860, which is probably pretty old (it's also 11.23). In
> case they're also relevant, it's using bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91264
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Similar for e.g.
const_cast(i)++;
-cpu=power8 --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
--with-as=/home/seurer/binutils/install/bin/as
--with-ld=/home/seurer/binutils/install/bin/ld
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 10.0.0 20190725 (experimental) [trunk revision 273783] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86688
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 86688, which changed state.
Bug 86688 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow using a non-string local array
in strnlen with excessive bound
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86688
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91264
Bug ID: 91264
Summary: modifying const-qual object in constexpr context not
detected
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91260
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91263
Bug ID: 91263
Summary: unordered_map and unordered_set operator== double key
comparison causes exponential behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91258
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jul 25 19:03:00 2019
New Revision: 273812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91183
PR tree-optimization/86688
gcc/testsuite/Chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86688
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jul 25 19:03:00 2019
New Revision: 273812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91183
PR tree-optimization/86688
gcc/testsuite/Chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83928
--- Comment #1 from Stephen M. Webb ---
This appears to have been fixed as of the GCC 8.1 and later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91223
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jul 25 18:36:52 2019
New Revision: 273810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-25 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/91223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91262
Bug ID: 91262
Summary: using template type parameter after typename
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Jul 25 18:12:03 2019
New Revision: 273809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Address PR91087 - XFAIL parts of pr16855.C.
The testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91261
Bug ID: 91261
Summary: noptr-new-declarator does not accept converted
constant expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91260
Bug ID: 91260
Summary: std::unary_function and std::binary_function still
exist in C++17
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
Bug ID: 91259
Summary: Parenthesize requires clauses that contain expressions
that are not just a value of type bool
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91252
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed this patch on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01648.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65819
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jul 25 16:24:00 2019
New Revision: 273807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-25 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/65819
* dependen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91258
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
-enable-cheaders=c_global
> --enable-poison-system-directories --enable-nls --enable-__cxa_atexit
> Thread model: posix
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
> gcc version 10.0.0 20190725 (experimental) (GCC)
That's because you use --enable-checking=release. I can reproduce it on trunk
right now with a cross compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91256
--- Comment #1 from Danack at basereality dot com ---
As a bit more info - for the sake of debugging I added a sleep command in the
Imagick code just after where it tells the ImageMagick library to shut itself
down.
This seems to 'make the segfau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91258
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The gcc.dg/strlenopt-70.c failure looks like it only occurs on BE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91258
Bug ID: 91258
Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/vla-1.C and
gcc.dg/strlenopt-70.c fail starting with r273783
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Looks like trunk is quite a bit faster with 65s for some reason.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155
--- Comment #55 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Rogério de Souza Moraes from comment #53)
> Created attachment 46627 [details]
> New testcase that shows performance degradation in GCC 9.1
>
> This new testcase that shows performance degrada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
Bug ID: 91257
Summary: [7/8/9/10 Regression] Compile-time and memory-hog hog
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91256
Bug ID: 91256
Summary: openmp crash in shutdown
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
As this is symtab.c code: Honza, can you take a look at this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155
--- Comment #54 from Rogério de Souza Moraes
---
Hi everyone,
we continue to get performance degradation as we use a new compiler version to
build the source code 'testcase-v1.c" that is available in the attachment
above.
Could you please chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #100 from C. Heide ---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #99)
> (In reply to C. Heide from comment #98)
> > (In reply to The Written Word from comment #97)
> > > No issues with PCH or libsupc++ like I'm seeing?
> >
> > No, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91255
Bug ID: 91255
Summary: Can't use define_subst in target that uses
set_attr_alternative
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155
--- Comment #53 from Rogério de Souza Moraes
---
Created attachment 46627
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46627&action=edit
New testcase that shows performance degradation in GCC 9.1
This new testcase that shows performance
-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-linker-build-id --with-ppl=no
--with-cloog=no --enable-checking=release --enable-cheaders=c_global
--enable-poison-system-directories --enable-nls --enable-__cxa_atexit
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 10.0.0 20190725
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66477
YSC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yankel-webservices@scialom.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 25 10:50:47 2019
New Revision: 273795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-25 Richard Biener
PR lto/90924
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 25 10:48:26 2019
New Revision: 273794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-25 Richard Biener
PR lto/90924
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 25 10:46:54 2019
New Revision: 273793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-25 Richard Biener
PR lto/90924
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91252
--- Comment #3 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
When I used binutils version 2.32 we are getting the same result
@akhilesh-ubuntu:~/akhilesh/lto$ gcc -flto -o nornal myapp.c
@akhilesh-ubuntu:~/akhilesh/lto$ ./bin/nm -C ./nornal | grep power
004
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91254
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
For me it is "stuck" in the loop at line 170.
Note it works fine for 200 digits and also 400. Maybe you simply need to
wait longer? That is, I doubt it is GCCs fault - maybe the code is simply
slow?
You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jul 25 09:36:38 2019
New Revision: 273791
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273791&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Extend DCE to remove unnecessary new/delete-pairs (PR c++/23383).
2019-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91245
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91245
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 25 08:01:20 2019
New Revision: 273788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273788&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/91245
* gnat.dg/float_value1.adb: Only ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91245
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91252
dongkyun.s at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dongkyun.s at samsung dot
58 matches
Mail list logo
