[Bug c++/90966] New: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16155

2019-06-22 Thread frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90966 Bug ID: 90966 Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16155 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/89782] Can do an internal READ of a character array when it is a parameter, but not a scalar character parameter

2019-06-22 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89782 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jun 22 19:58:47 2019 New Revision: 272594 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272594&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-22 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/89782 * io.c (

[Bug tree-optimization/19347] Invariant load not moved out of loop

2019-06-22 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19347 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Reconfirmed. Note we do vectorize the loop now but we add a runtime check > for the aliasing (and not move the invariant out either). So wait if the vectorizat

[Bug c++/90965] New: Improve diagnostic for out-of-line constructor

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90965 Bug ID: 90965 Summary: Improve diagnostic for out-of-line constructor Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

2019-06-22 Thread kkylheku at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 --- Comment #48 from Kaz Kylheku --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #47) > I see two problems with this suggestion, one minor and one major. > > First, there may well be a value > 1 on the stack for a regular > call, see comment #15. T

[Bug c++/90455] braced-init and incomplete type instantiation

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90455 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90455] braced-init and incomplete type instantiation

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90455 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed (by r272287 I suspect).

[Bug c++/58836] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of initializer list in non-type template argument

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58836 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65707] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:18577

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65707 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89480] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:22160 with the template argument force conversion

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89480 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65707] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:18577

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65707 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 16:29:06 2019 New Revision: 272589 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272589&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65707 PR c++/89480 PR c++/58836

[Bug c++/58836] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of initializer list in non-type template argument

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58836 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 16:29:06 2019 New Revision: 272589 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272589&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65707 PR c++/89480 PR c++/58836

[Bug c++/89480] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:22160 with the template argument force conversion

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89480 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 16:29:06 2019 New Revision: 272589 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272589&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65707 PR c++/89480 PR c++/58836

[Bug c++/90964] SJLJ: Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

2019-06-22 Thread ocroquette at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90964 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Croquette --- Also reported in the MinGW-w64 project: https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/800/

[Bug c++/90964] New: SJLJ: Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

2019-06-22 Thread ocroquette at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90964 Bug ID: 90964 Summary: SJLJ: Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 15:51:49 2019 New Revision: 272588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272588&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66256 * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept54.C: New test. A

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90537] Implement P1286R2, Contra CWG DR1778

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90537 Bug 90537 depends on bug 86476, which changed state. Bug 86476 Summary: Members declared later in a class appear to be unavailable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86476 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/86476] Members declared later in a class appear to be unavailable

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86476 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/90963] New: [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution test

2019-06-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90963 Bug ID: 90963 Summary: [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 --- Comment #18 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 15:14:30 2019 New Revision: 272586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272586&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context.

[Bug c++/86476] Members declared later in a class appear to be unavailable

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86476 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 15:14:30 2019 New Revision: 272586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272586&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context.

[Bug c++/90881] -Wunused-value false positive in SFINAE context

2019-06-22 Thread federico.kircheis at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90881 --- Comment #9 from Federico Kircheis --- Hi, did you consider my last comment (Comment 6)? I find it unfortunate that gcc will not warn anymore about unused variables in some circumstances. Maybe my example was not a good one, but I guess tha

[Bug c++/90881] -Wunused-value false positive in SFINAE context

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90881 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180 Bug 89180 depends on bug 90881, which changed state. Bug 90881 Summary: -Wunused-value false positive in SFINAE context https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90881 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/90881] -Wunused-value false positive in SFINAE context

2019-06-22 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90881 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 22 14:43:00 2019 New Revision: 272585 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272585&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/90881 - bogus -Wunused-value in unevaluated context.

[Bug c/90962] New: Array bound over optimization

2019-06-22 Thread patrick.pelissier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90962 Bug ID: 90962 Summary: Array bound over optimization Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assigne

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

2019-06-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 --- Comment #47 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Kaz Kylheku from comment #45) > Hi everyone. > > Pardon my ignorance of C-Fortran bridging matters, but does any of the > following make sense? > > The Fortran subroutine has no idea whether t

[Bug target/83250] _mm256_zextsi128_si256 missing for AVX2 zero extension

2019-06-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83250 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2