https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88529
--- Comment #5 from Antony Polukhin ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1)
> Created attachment 45899 [details]
> Fix
Is it enough to test only for `scan-assembler-not mov`? Probably a
`scan-assembler-not xor` should be also added?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90923
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jun 19 03:02:21 2019
New Revision: 272467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-19 Jim MacArthur
Mark Eggleston
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90912
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34678
--- Comment #42 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 46502
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46502&action=edit
other hack
Another approach.
* lowering in an optimization pass is idiotic, it only works at -O2+, but it
shows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
Bug ID: 90924
Summary: lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c heap memory corruption due to
insufficient sanitization.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90912
--- Comment #3 from Witold Krecicki ---
It seems to be a bad interaction between GCC and Solaris linker, with GNU ld it
works correctly on all optimization levels - gcc -v below. Unfortunately gcc
shipped with Solaris is using Solaris linker.
``
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90743
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90922
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90922
--- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:19:12 2019
New Revision: 272455
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272455&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
xtensa: fix PR target/90922
Stack pointer adjustment code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85221
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:15:43 2019
New Revision: 272453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR85221] Set 'omp declare target', 'omp declare target link' attrib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90921
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:15:53 2019
New Revision: 272454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR90921] Fortran OpenACC 'declare' directive's module handling caus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90859
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:15:16 2019
New Revision: 272452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR90859] Document status quo for "[OMP] Mappings for VLA different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90743
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:14:24 2019
New Revision: 272447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272447&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR90743] Fortran 'allocatable' with OpenACC data/OpenMP 'target' 'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90861
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:14:14 2019
New Revision: 272446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR90861] Document status quo for OpenACC 'declare' not cleaning up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90868
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:14:04 2019
New Revision: 272445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR90868] Document status quo for duplicate OpenACC 'declare' direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90862
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Jun 18 22:13:54 2019
New Revision: 272444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR90862] OpenACC 'declare' ICE when nested inside another construct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90923
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84698
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84698
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 18 21:50:51 2019
New Revision: 272443
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272443&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84698
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept42.C: New test.
Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90923
Bug ID: 90923
Summary: hash_map destroys elements without constructing them
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84698
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83689
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87838
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90922
Bug ID: 90922
Summary: Bad prologue generated for call0 ABI functions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63578
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71548
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 18 20:55:46 2019
New Revision: 272438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71548
* g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic177.C: New test.
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90862
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57527
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90921
Bug ID: 90921
Summary: Fortran OpenACC 'declare' directive's module handling
causes duplicate data clauses
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
When fixing the bug, let's please make sure that the dups are fixed also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85221
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90577
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58836
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61341
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90577
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Tue Jun 18 20:21:47 2019
New Revision: 272437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-18 Harald Anlauf
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Tue Jun 18 20:21:47 2019
New Revision: 272437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-18 Harald Anlauf
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90883
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77554
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90912
--- Comment #2 from Witold Krecicki ---
I was able to reproduce it on fresh build of gcc 9.1.0:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/gcc/9/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/gcc/9/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-solaris2.11/9.1.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79628
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80667
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84822
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Still ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90919
Marshall Clow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mclow.lists at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86478
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89480
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90170
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
Bug ID: 90920
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ABI incompatibility in std::rotate
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65707
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90887
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90919
Bug ID: 90919
Summary: vector::iterator is constructible from a pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87907
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87907
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 06:20:06PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> This patch
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87907
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90918
Bug ID: 90918
Summary: -Wreturn-local-addr in __splitstack_find in
libgcc/generic-morestack.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90916
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90916
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90905
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
> With str being a local (non-reference) variable this should be diagnosed
> because of the str.D.28972._M_local_buf(12):
>
> # _47 = PHI <_59(9), &str.D.28972._M_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90901
--- Comment #3 from Rajpal Singh ---
I did try with g++ 9.1.0 and I still see similar/same issue.
% g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 9.1.0
% readelf -w
readelf: Error: Unknown macro opcode 52 seen
readelf: Error: Unknown macro opcode 12 seen
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90901
--- Comment #2 from Rajpal Singh ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You may want to check GCC 9.1 which received some fixes for -gsplit-dwarf
> which is otherwise in a sorry and unmaintained state...
Thanks Richard for your sugge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90915
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90914
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |debug
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90917
--- Comment #1 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
char f(void) {
char* s = ... ;
if (strcmp(global_s, s) == 0) return global_s[0];
return '-';
}
-->
char f2(void) {
char* s = ... ;
if (strcmp(global_s, s) == 0) return s[0];
return '-';
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90905
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
With str being a local (non-reference) variable this should be diagnosed
because of the str.D.28972._M_local_buf(12):
# _47 = PHI <_59(9), &str.D.28972._M_local_buf(12), _59(8)>
str ={v} {CLOBBER};
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90917
Bug ID: 90917
Summary: Propagate constants into loads if dominated by
str(n)cmp/memcmp
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90907
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90916
Bug ID: 90916
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in retrieve_specialization, at
cp/pt.c:1258
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90915
Bug ID: 90915
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at
c-family/c-attribs.c:4221
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
--- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz ---
A modified variant :
$ cat z2.cc
template
void foo (int n)
{
int a[n];
[a]{};
}
void bar ()
{
foo (2);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90914
Bug ID: 90914
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in
schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:27153
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90841
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Other variants may also involve :
__atomic_store_n
__atomic_exchange
__atomic_exchange_n
__atomic_compare_exchange
Compiles smoothly with fixed size :
$ cat z3.c
int a[2];
void f()
{ __atomic_l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60223
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90905
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
struct A { char*p; char c[13]; };
void f(A&a,bool b){
a.p=b?a.c:(char*)__builtin_malloc(13);
__builtin_memcpy(a.p, "hello world!", 12);
a.p[12]=0;
}
gives
if (b_4(D) != 0)
goto ; [67.00%]
else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
I think the below tweak of r271490 should be fine, it considers the bases only
when the fn isn't pure virtual:
Index: call.c
===
--- call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Somehow we end up with
(gdb) p debug_tree (maskt)
unit-size
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x76c52b28 precision:1 min max >
visited
def_stmt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Reproduced with -Ofast -march=znver1 -mveclibabi=svml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46500
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46500&action=edit
optimized dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #74 from Damien Merenne ---
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention it is building with -j1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
$ (gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x18cc0d0 "/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/optabs.c",
line=7341, function=0x18cc738 "maybe_gen_insn") at
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:1614
#1 0x00d16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90887
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #9)
> cp_parser_jump_statement (for RID_RETURN) [...]
The tree is already different for cp_parser_identifier (called via <-
cp_parser_class_name <- cp_parser_type_nam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #73 from Jens-S. Vöckler ---
I agree with Damien Merenne: I recently tried to build gcc 8 on High Sierra on
an APFS in various ways, and it failed every time. I used my old work-around of
creating an HFS+ partition-in-a-file to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86521
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86521
--- Comment #12 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Is this resolved for GCC 8.4 now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[8/9/10 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90913
Bug ID: 90913
Summary: [10 Regress] ICE in maybe_gen_insn, at optabs.c:7341
since r272239
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90911
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #72 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Damien Merenne from comment #71)
> enable-execute-stack.c:25:10: fatal error: sys/mman.h: No such file or
> directory
That's a completely different error. That header is not part of GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Damien Merenne changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dam at cosinux dot org
--- Comment #71
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
