$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 10.0.0 20190602 (experimental) [trunk revision 271843] (GCC)
$ gdb -v
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.11.1-0ubuntu1~16.5) 7.11.1
#Correct output#
$ gcc-trunk -g abc.c outer.c
$ gdb -x cmds -batch a.out
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40049d: file abc.c, line 10.
Breakpoint 1, main () at abc.c:10
10
int, char
const*, omp_clause_code, omp_clause_code)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20190602/work/gcc-10-20190602/gcc/tree.c:10042
0x5cbd64 omp_clause_range_check(tree_node*, omp_clause_code, omp_clause_code,
char const*, int, char const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24729
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32503
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed. I had done tree-level expansion of powi into add/mul sequences at
> one time. But this had been rejected for some reason I cannot remember
> right n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89750
--- Comment #3 from liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jun 3 02:20:33 2019
New Revision: 271853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-05-06 H.J. Lu
Hongtao Liu
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86444
--- Comment #2 from liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jun 3 02:20:33 2019
New Revision: 271853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-05-06 H.J. Lu
Hongtao Liu
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90714
Bug ID: 90714
Summary: ia64: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52731
Jason Duerstock changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason.duerstock at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90653
Alexander von Gluck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
So, I played around with this a little. By putting in
-flto and -ffat-lto-binaries into CFLAGS, FFLAGS and LDFLAGS
into the Makefile in the libgfortran build directory, it is
possible to build an LTO-enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
Bug ID: 90713
Summary: [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal
compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90712
Bug ID: 90712
Summary: [10 regression] gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/subs_adds_sp.c
fails with ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
--- Comment #35 from Orr Shalom Dvory ---
Hi, thanks for your respond. can someone mark this bug as need to be improved?
Does anyone agree/disagree with my new proposed method?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
--- Comment #2 from sagebar at web dot de ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1)
> We focus most of our effort on avoiding false positives with -O2
> optimization levels. As you lower the optimization level (-Og) you will
> almost certa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
One thing we would also have to tackle is GFC_LOGICAL arguments.
C only has one bool type, which is (for gcc) equivalent to
logical(kind=1). We might just get by with
typedef enum { _zero=1, _one=1 } GFC_L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711
--- Comment #1 from David Hunt ---
Self-contained :
---
namespace test {
void EXISTS(int);
}
template
struct stub_void {
typedef void type;
};
template
using stub_void_t = typename stub_void::type;
#if !defined(SUPPRESS)
template
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711
Bug ID: 90711
Summary: Failing SFINAE from unrelated struct
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
Bug ID: 90710
Summary: Bogus Wmaybe-uninitialized caused by __builtin_expect
when compiled with -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
--- Comment #50 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jun 2 15:18:22 2019
New Revision: 271844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/90539
* trans-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
22 matches
Mail list logo
