[Bug middle-end/90354] [7.3 regression] Skip the not first insn when traversing the insn node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90354 --- Comment #4 from vfdff --- Another issue, it is not suiteable for some target supported more than 2 insns issued together ? But the following code already exist very long without problem. /* ??? Hopefully multiple delay slots are not annul

[Bug objc/90707] GNU Objective C (C++) does not support nullability syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug objc/68943] GCC should support nullable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68943 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug objc/90709] [meta-bug] GNU Objective C (C++) cannot consume current headers on Darwin platforms.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #2 f

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc/90709] [meta-bug] GNU Objective C (C++) cannot consume current headers on Darwin platforms.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||meta-bug Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug objc/90709] New: [meta-bug] GNU Objective C (C++) cannot consume current headers on Darwin platforms.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709 Bug ID: 90709 Summary: [meta-bug] GNU Objective C (C++) cannot consume current headers on Darwin platforms. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug objc/90708] GNU Objective C (C++) does not support lightweight generics.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90708 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target|

[Bug objc/90708] New: GNU Objective C (C++) does not support lightweight generics.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90708 Bug ID: 90708 Summary: GNU Objective C (C++) does not support lightweight generics. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug objc/90707] GNU Objective C (C++) does not support nullability syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target||*-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug objc/90707] New: GNU Objective C (C++) does not support nullability syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707 Bug ID: 90707 Summary: GNU Objective C (C++) does not support nullability syntax. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/90706] New: Useless code generated for stack / register operations on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706 Bug ID: 90706 Summary: Useless code generated for stack / register operations on AVR Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/90705] New: Suboptimal register allocation on ARM when compiling for size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90705 Bug ID: 90705 Summary: Suboptimal register allocation on ARM when compiling for size Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/90704] New: filesystem::path overloads for file streams are not conforming

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90704 Bug ID: 90704 Summary: filesystem::path overloads for file streams are not conforming Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/90703] New: A virtuous bug: `=delete` accepted on second declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90703 Bug ID: 90703 Summary: A virtuous bug: `=delete` accepted on second declaration Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/63891] [7/8/9 regression] Failure of darwin-weakimport-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9/10 regression] |[7/8/9 regression] Failure

[Bug testsuite/27221] g++.dg/ext/alignof2.C fails on powerpc-darwin (and powerpc-aix)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sat Jun 1 19:59:30 2019 New Revision: 271839 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271839&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Darwin, x86, testsuite - adjust tests for Darwin PR90698. We don't have sup

[Bug libstdc++/90702] New: FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/proj.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90702 Bug ID: 90702 Summary: FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/proj.cc execution test Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: l

[Bug translation/90701] GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- -nostdlib controls which libraries to link against, you can still link against a set of C library. While -ffreestanding controls if you are compiling freestanding C (which is part of the C standard).

[Bug translation/90701] GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783 --- Comment #5 from tfx --- CVE-2018-20673 has been assigned to this bug.

[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug translation/90701] GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701 jynelson at email dot sc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Jun 1 17:27:20 2019 New Revision: 271838 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271838&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/90694 - incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a po

[Bug translation/90701] GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug translation/90701] GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701 --- Comment #1 from jynelson at email dot sc.edu --- See also the corrosponding Clang bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42099

[Bug translation/90701] New: GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701 Bug ID: 90701 Summary: GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with -nostdlib Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug rtl-optimization/88751] Performance regression reload vs lra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88751 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #4) > (In reply to Babneet Singh from comment #3) > > Hi Andreas and Richard: What's the status for this issue? Which approach > > will be used to resolve this iss

[Bug middle-end/90676] default GIMPLE dumps lack information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90676 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/90578] Wrong code with LSHIFT and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Can you please explain what you expect? As usual, the impossible;-) More seriously: (1) the test suite should not invoke undefined behavior, i.e., the test gfortran.dg/lrshift_1.f90 should be fixe

[Bug c/90680] Misleading fixit warning with pointers to pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90680 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/90700] Wrong constraints for tuple(allocator_arg_t, const A&, const tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90700 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/90700] New: Wrong constraints for tuple(allocator_arg_t, const A&, const tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90700 Bug ID: 90700 Summary: Wrong constraints for tuple(allocator_arg_t, const A&, const tuple&) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-val

[Bug c++/85254] boost::is_final does not work for template types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85254 --- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Sat Jun 1 10:57:12 2019 New Revision: 271835 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271835&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/85254 gcc/cp PR c++/85254 * class.c (fixup_type_variant

[Bug c++/68901] UBSan triggers false -Wpadded warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68901 --- Comment #10 from Trass3r --- Yeah short on time. (plus the testsuite can't be run properly in WSL due to stack overflows: https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/633) Feel free to pick up the patch. Any comments on ARTIFICIAL not being used

[Bug tree-optimization/79716] memset followed by overwrite not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79716 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. The issue is that DSE does not track variable-size stores like > this > and thus stmt_kills_ref_p (temp, ref) returns false for memcpy and the ref > fo

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline masked minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/89864] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #98 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sat Jun 1 07:41:06 2019 New Revision: 271834 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271834&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Darwin - backport fix for PR bootstrap/89864 2019-06-01 Iain Sandoe