[Bug tree-optimization/90270] [8/9/10 Regression] Do not select best induction variable optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90270] [8/9/10 Regression] Do not select best induction variable optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90270] [8/9/10 Regression] Do not select best induction variable optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/90270] New: Do not select best induction variable optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90270 Bug ID: 90270 Summary: Do not select best induction variable optimization Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/90267] [7.3 regression] wrong code generated wth -O2 as missing data dependence base on memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90267 --- Comment #3 from vfdff --- but it doesn't warning anything, even with -Wstrict-aliasing -Wall. Accord to http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_74caf0ce010173up.html, We expect an warning similar the following infomation. warning: dereferencing typ

[Bug c++/90173] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in strip_declarator_types)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90173 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Apr 27 21:56:17 2019 New Revision: 270626 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270626&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/90173 * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction66.C: Use dg-do

[Bug middle-end/90216] Stack Pointer decrementing even when not loading extra data to stack.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90216 --- Comment #2 from stevexiong98 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Confirmed, part of the problem is union is forced to memory early on but > then optimized out but the object still exist in memory even though it

[Bug objc++/49070] [7/8/9/10 regression] ObjC++ compiler fails to compile ObjC method invocations without keyword arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49070 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/50422] -Wswitch warns about unhandled cases in nested switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50422 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/55096] Wconversion-nul does not work in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55096 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/90269] loop distribution defeated by clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90269 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- --- tree-loop-distribution.c(revision 270624) +++ tree-loop-distribution.c(working copy) @@ -3033,20 +3033,23 @@ find_seed_stmts_for_distribution (struct the loop. */ if (!stmt_h

[Bug tree-optimization/90269] New: loop distribution defeated by clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90269 Bug ID: 90269 Summary: loop distribution defeated by clobbers Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/90036] [8/9/10 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/87106] Group move and destruction of the source, where possible, for speed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106 --- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Sat Apr 27 14:09:20 2019 New Revision: 270624 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270624&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Use __restrict for __relocate_object_a 2019-04-27 Marc Glisse

[Bug target/89261] ix86_data_alignment has wrong argument type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89261 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89261] ix86_data_alignment has wrong argument type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89261 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sat Apr 27 13:38:19 2019 New Revision: 270623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270623&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/89261 * config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_

[Bug c++/89953] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953 Hannes Hauswedell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org --- Comment

[Bug c/90036] [8/9/10 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- I see smth may be similar starts at r265648 / PR87041 265647 NO warnings 265648 warnings 270581 warnings $ cat x.cpp #include #include extern void extf(char*); extern unsigned U1; extern unsigned

[Bug libobjc/90268] compile failure for gcc9, missing libtool in that directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libobjc/90268] compile failure for gcc9, missing libtool in that directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90268 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Are you building in the src directory? That is normally not tested.

[Bug libobjc/90268] compile failure for gcc9, missing libtool in that directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|objc|libobjc --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk