https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81058
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46210|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46208|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90181
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually it is not as bad if you use preprocessor tricks.
Like this code from glibc for aarch64:
# undef INTERNAL_SYSCALL_RAW
# define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_RAW(name, err, nr, args...) \
({ long _sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90181
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875
--- Comment #6 from Nikita Kniazev ---
> Those pragmas are all extensions, so the standard doesn't cover them.
There was a Clang bug report recently with a pretty much same code I had posted
previously and Clang developers said that it is ill-fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90196
--- Comment #1 from Максим Прохоренко ---
Start
prog.cc:6:19: warning: unused variable 'std_unused_bitset' [-Wunused-variable]
std::bitset<20> std_unused_bitset;
^
prog.cc:9:10: warning: unused variable 'unused_double' [-Wunus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90196
Bug ID: 90196
Summary: std:: types unused without warnings but simple type
not affected
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(As Alexander said in comment 1... I need to learn how to read some day).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The same splitter is what causes the bb of the asm to be marked as
always falling through, which is why that non-fallthrough label is
eventually deleted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It emits an insn instead if a jump_insn in the asm, during split1, in
(define_split
[(match_operand 0 "tls_address_pattern")]
"TARGET_TLS_DIRECT_SEG_REFS"
[(match_dup 0)]
"operands[0] = ix86_rew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> It actually ICEs if you have checking enabled.
Didn't for me with:
GNU C17 (GCC) version 9.0.1 20190401 (experimental) [master revision
449a19898aa:0239598e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90130
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> The gdc.test/runnable/test12.d test FAILs on Solaris 11/SPARC with Robin's
> big-endian
> patches applied:
>
> FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/test12.d -finline-functions -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
--- Comment #3 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Reconfirmed with today trunk (r270470).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88775
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89293
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89293
--- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sat Apr 20 17:14:50 2019
New Revision: 270470
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270470&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libphobos: core.atomic should have fallback when there's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90166
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90167
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90195
--- Comment #2 from pat at rack911labs dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Use a TMPDIR env if you want to prevent other users from getting access to
> files.
>
> This is a minor security hole really because it allows a pers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90195
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Use a TMPDIR env if you want to prevent other users from getting access to
files.
This is a minor security hole really because it allows a person with already
have access to do bad things. If you trust an u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu Desnoyers
---
By the way, it can also be reproduced by replacing the "jmp" instruction within
the inline asm by a ".long":
# 1 "test-asm-goto-data.c"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 31 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90195
Bug ID: 90195
Summary: GCC: Insecure Tmp Write(s) / Arbitrary Data Injection
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
Bug ID: 90194
Summary: ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:5244
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90150
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 70752, which changed state.
Bug 70752 Summary: Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||menospaamthereaper@hotmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90169
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Dom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32605
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jed Brown from comment #5)
> The missed optimization even exists for code such as this, which should
> compile to a simple load on LE architectures.
That is because GCC decided to only optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81058
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> Created attachment 46210 [details]
> Patch for testing
>
> Darwin doesn't support non-pic for user-space programs, so these tests fail
> (and the codeine is sufficie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
35 matches
Mail list logo
