[Bug c++/89953] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953 --- Comment #3 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de --- Hi sorry, it took me a while to provide the preprocessed source file. I have reduced it with multidelta.

[Bug c++/89953] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953 --- Comment #2 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de --- Created attachment 46092 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46092&action=edit reduced preprocessed source file

[Bug fortran/89981] New: [8/9 Regression] gfortran -pedantic rejects code in 8.3.1 that is accepted with 8.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89981 Bug ID: 89981 Summary: [8/9 Regression] gfortran -pedantic rejects code in 8.3.1 that is accepted with 8.3.0 Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug bootstrap/89980] [9 Regression] bootstrap failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89980 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/89980] New: [9 Regression] bootstrap failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89980 Bug ID: 89980 Summary: [9 Regression] bootstrap failed Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c++/89948] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89966] [9 Regression] non-type template argument rejects sizeof operator result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89966 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89948] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 5 02:52:23 2019 New Revision: 270161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89948 - ICE with break in statement-expr. * conste

[Bug c++/86932] [8 Regression] Empty non-type template parameter pack not considered for SFINAE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86932 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:52 2019 New Revision: 270160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270160&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89966 - error with non-type auto tparm. My patch for PR 86

[Bug c++/89966] [9 Regression] non-type template argument rejects sizeof operator result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89966 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:52 2019 New Revision: 270160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270160&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89966 - error with non-type auto tparm. My patch for PR 86

[Bug c++/86986] [7/8/9 Regression] Unexpected errors for template parameter pack in a template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86986 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:18 2019 New Revision: 270159 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270159&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86986 - ICE with TTP with parameter pack. Three separate i

[Bug c++/89914] [9 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89914 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|paolo.carlin

[Bug fortran/79842] i18n: subword translation in "Can't use the same %smodule"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79842 --- Comment #3 from Roland Illig --- Any progress on this one? To me it sounds like it were quite easy to fix.

[Bug fortran/84382] add command-line options -std=gnu2003 and -std=gnu2008 for gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug ipa/89924] [missed-optimization] Function not de-virtualized within the same TU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89924 --- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > The reason why we do not devirtualize is that only information about Aint is > the type of function parameter "Only"? :-) > and we do not believe it implies the

[Bug c++/71487] sorry, unimplemented: mangling offset_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71487 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-06-26 00:00:00 |2019-4-4 CC|

[Bug c++/89878] same specializations on a zero-initialized struct object as a non-type parameter treated as distinct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89878 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89974] ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct object with pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/47488] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89833] [9 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89833 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89974] ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct object with pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019 New Revision: 270155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struc

[Bug c++/47488] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019 New Revision: 270155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a stru

[Bug c++/89833] [9 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89833 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019 New Revision: 270155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struc

[Bug c++/89878] same specializations on a zero-initialized struct object as a non-type parameter treated as distinct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89878 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019 New Revision: 270155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struc

[Bug c++/89974] ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct object with pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/89957] ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89957] ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 22:38:10 2019 New Revision: 270154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270154&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/89957 - ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a know

[Bug middle-end/89911] [9 Regression] ICE in get_attr_nonstring_decl, at calls.c:1502

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89911 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89911] [9 Regression] ICE in get_attr_nonstring_decl, at calls.c:1502

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89911 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 22:38:10 2019 New Revision: 270154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270154&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/89957 - ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a know

[Bug middle-end/89934] [8 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89934] [8 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 22:16:11 2019 New Revision: 270153 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270153&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from 9.0. PR middle-end/89934 - ICE on a call with fewer argumen

[Bug debug/55585] compile time hog at -O1 -fboundscheck -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55585 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89934] [8 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9 Regression] ICE on a |[8 Regression] ICE on a

[Bug middle-end/89934] [9 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Apr 4 21:59:49 2019 New Revision: 270152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270152&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/89934 - ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declar

[Bug libstdc++/89979] subtract_with_carry_engine incorrect carry flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89979 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Conrads --- There is no attachment with the preprocessed code demonstrating the problem because the this code is 1.2 MB large.

[Bug libstdc++/89979] New: subtract_with_carry_engine incorrect carry flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89979 Bug ID: 89979 Summary: subtract_with_carry_engine incorrect carry flag Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/89582] Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 --- Comment #10 from Nikolay Bogoychev --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > > Ok, let me first focus on the functional part of the patch. > > If I'm correct feature_list in get_builtin_code_for_

[Bug fortran/84382] add command-line options -std=gnu2003 and -std=gnu2008 for gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from janus

[Bug fortran/41650] [Cleanup] Use gfc_expr_attr in resolve_allocate_expr/resolve_deallocate_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41650 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/89399] [7/8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'set', 'clobber' or 'clobber_high', have 'parallel' in combine_reaching_defs, at ree.c:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89399 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE: RTL |[7/8 Regression] ICE: RTL

[Bug target/89399] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'set', 'clobber' or 'clobber_high', have 'parallel' in combine_reaching_defs, at ree.c:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89399 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Apr 4 20:52:16 2019 New Revision: 270151 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270151&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/89399 * ree.c (combine_set_extension):

[Bug fortran/89904] [9 regression] ICE in gfortran starting with r270045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904 --- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #20) > Patch here: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg3.html Patch applied to trunk so far. Unfortunately, I had the wrong PR in the ChangeLog (P

[Bug c++/89978] New: Extraneous template keyword not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89978 Bug ID: 89978 Summary: Extraneous template keyword not rejected Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug d/89004] mtype.c:2329:33: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Werror=sign-compare]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89004 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Thu Apr 4 20:38:33 2019 New Revision: 270150 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270150&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-04 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89004

[Bug target/89967] Inefficient code generation for vld2q_lane_u8 under aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89967 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/87366] [7/8/9 Regression] SFINAE trait as template parameter causes incorrect application of trait to other areas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87366 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/89877] [ARC] miscompilation due to missing cc clobber in longlong.h: add_ssaaaa()/sub_ddmmss()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89877 Vineet Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/89905] gcc generates wrong debug information at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89905 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > Ok, let me first focus on the functional part of the patch. > If I'm correct feature_list in get_builtin_code_for_version function should > be basically aligned with isa

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|89936 | --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---

[Bug web/89964] Remove the "First, you must pick a product on which to enter a bug:" page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89964 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- I suggested splitting the bugzillas into 2 in bug 29304 comment 4 but Andrew seemed to think it was ok to keep them together

[Bug c/89968] attribute packed fails to reduce char vector member alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89968 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- One problem is the order of the attributes applying here. vector_size applies after all the others as that is the order in the program.

[Bug c++/89966] [9 Regression] non-type template argument rejects sizeof operator result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89966 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/89964] Remove the "First, you must pick a product on which to enter a bug:" page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89964 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89937] For example code, which is valid as either C or C++, optimization seems much better for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89937 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c++/89948] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/89977] New: missing -Wstringop-overflow with an out-of-bounds int128_t range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89977 Bug ID: 89977 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow with an out-of-bounds int128_t range Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/89975] Compile-time hog w/ large values of --param uninlined-function-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89975 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The param is there to limit compile time after all.

[Bug target/89955] riscv.h improperly defines STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89955 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #39 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Erik Schnetter from comment #38) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #36) > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35) > > > The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. S

[Bug middle-end/89970] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dispatch_function_versions, at config/i386/i386.c:32347

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89970 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/89970] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dispatch_function_versions, at config/i386/i386.c:32347

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89970 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Hits assert in i386.c, dispatch_function_versions: /* At least one more version other than the default. */ num_versions = fndecls->length (); gcc_assert (num_versions >= 2); But... this just asserts on

[Bug rtl-optimization/89528] Wrong debug info generated at -Og [gcc-trunk]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 46089 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46089&action=edit candidate patch Here's what I'm testing

[Bug c++/89976] New: missing uninitialized warning: laundering via passing object through a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976 Bug ID: 89976 Summary: missing uninitialized warning: laundering via passing object through a function Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: d

[Bug middle-end/89975] New: Compile-time hog w/ large values of --param uninlined-function-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89975 Bug ID: 89975 Summary: Compile-time hog w/ large values of --param uninlined-function-insns Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time

[Bug c++/89923] printf format check and char8_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89923 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- But the precedent with wchar_t is that the type of the format string determines the type of the %s arguments. I'm not sure if that's a good precedent, but it's what we have today.

[Bug c++/89923] printf format check and char8_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89923 --- Comment #2 from Tom Honermann --- I think my preferred fix to this is to introduce new length modifiers for the "%s" conversion specifier for all of char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t.

[Bug c++/89974] New: ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct object with pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974 Bug ID: 89974 Summary: ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct object with pointer to member function Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/89973] [9 Regression] ICE in check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member, at c-family/c-warn.c:2769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89973 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #38 from Erik Schnetter --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #36) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35) > > The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all > > the files mentioned before have to

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #37 from Erik Schnetter --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35) > The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all > the files mentioned before have to be modified, asan_mac.cc, > sanitizer_mac.cc, >

[Bug fortran/55591] strict-aliasing & Fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Testing the updated patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/options.c 2019-03-11 15:11:11.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/options.c 2019-04-04 18:55:50.0 +0200 @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ gfc_init_o

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #36 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35) > The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all > the files mentioned before have to be modified, asan_mac.cc, > sanitizer_mac.cc, > san

[Bug fortran/87919] Incorrect fortran handling of -fno-* options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87919 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- What is the status of this PR? Is it FIXED or not?

[Bug c++/89973] New: [9 Regression] ICE in check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member, at c-family/c-warn.c:2769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89973 Bug ID: 89973 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member, at c-family/c-warn.c:2769 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UN

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #35 from Jürgen Reuter --- The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all the files mentioned before have to be modified, asan_mac.cc, sanitizer_mac.cc, sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc, darwin-driver.c

[Bug fortran/89844] CFI_setpointer produces wrong descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89844 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This PR seems also fixed by revision r270037. Is a new test needed? If yes, would it help if I do the packaging?

[Bug c/89972] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89972 Bug ID: 89972 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4229 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/89969] [OPENACC] private clause does not work with fortran automatic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89969 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/89937] For example code, which is valid as either C or C++, optimization seems much better for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89937 --- Comment #6 from Walt Karas --- Yes, very sorry, I didn't realize inline was so different in C, and I also didn't read the generated machine code carefully enough. It does seem extremely surprising that, for C, the body of an inline function

[Bug c/89971] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE: unspellable token PADDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971 Bug ID: 89971 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: unspellable token PADDING Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/89970] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in dispatch_function_versions, at config/i386/i386.c:32347

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89970 Bug ID: 89970 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in dispatch_function_versions, at config/i386/i386.c:32347 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug fortran/84382] add command-line options -std=gnu2003 and -std=gnu2008 for gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/89893] Segmentation fault always occurs when node app is generated by gcc-8-branch@268745

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89893 --- Comment #21 from 康 珊 --- All of the experiments were did in according to the build steps I just gave to you.

[Bug c++/65608] [meta-bug] friend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608 Bug 65608 depends on bug 65619, which changed state. Bug 65619 Summary: friend declaration with template template parameter not recognized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/65619] friend declaration with template template parameter not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/65619] friend declaration with template template parameter not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Apr 4 15:49:30 2019 New Revision: 270146 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270146&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-04 Paolo Carlini PR c++/65619 * g++

[Bug gcov-profile/89961] When "--intermediate-format" is used "--preserve-paths"/"--hash-filenames" is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961 --- Comment #3 from Cristian Morales Vega --- I have just took a look inside one of the intermediate format .gcov files and didn't see any "current_working_directory". There is a full path "file" variable though. Not sure if that's what you mean

[Bug rtl-optimization/89528] Wrong debug info generated at -Og [gcc-trunk]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug debug/89530] Wrong debug informations for C array generated at -Og [gcc-trunk]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89530 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva --- We'd need to add VTA notes to addressable objects, that currently only get older var-tracking treatment. It's usually enough, because, being addressable, they can't really change locations, and, because o

[Bug fortran/89969] New: [OPENACC] private clause does not work with fortran automatic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89969 Bug ID: 89969 Summary: [OPENACC] private clause does not work with fortran automatic array Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/65608] [meta-bug] friend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608 Bug 65608 depends on bug 61327, which changed state. Bug 61327 Summary: Problem with friend template object https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61327 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/61327] Problem with friend template object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61327 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61327] Problem with friend template object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61327 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Apr 4 15:38:05 2019 New Revision: 270145 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270145&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-04 Paolo Carlini PR c++/61327 * g++

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #34 from Erik Schnetter --- Here is an updated version of the patch that fixincludes both and , and does not need to touch any sources files in GCC any more: Index: fixincludes/inclhack.def =

[Bug debug/89529] Wrong debug info generated at -Og [gcc-trunk]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89529 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- Yeah, consumer issue, GDB can't deal with location views yet, so it can't tell apart the views just before the return from that at the return proper. It's actually a textbook situation of the kind that led

[Bug c/89968] attribute packed fails to reduce char vector member alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89968 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI, diagnostic See Also|

[Bug c/89968] New: attribute packed fails to reduce char vector member alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89968 Bug ID: 89968 Summary: attribute packed fails to reduce char vector member alignment Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug gcov-profile/89961] When "--intermediate-format" is used "--preserve-paths"/"--hash-filenames" is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Note that the intermediate format provides 'current_working_directory' value that should be easily used to distinguish among same files in different folders? Does it work for you?

  1   2   >